Opec+ output down despite Russian rebound

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 05/05/23

Opec+ production fell in April as a rebound in Russian supply was not enough to offset disruptions affecting Iraqi and Nigerian output.

Russian production rose by about 130,000 b/d last month, following a 200,000 b/d fall in March, according to Argus' latest estimate. Crude supply to Russian refineries was lower in April but exports were higher, as seaborne Urals and ESPO Blend loadings, as well as Druzhba pipeline deliveries, all increased compared with March.

The April data contain little to suggest Russia is making good on its pledge to cut production by 500,000 b/d compared with February levels, although deputy prime minister Alexander Novak on 4 May insisted that the country is implementing the announced reductions.

The higher Russian supply and steady output by other non-Opec members of the coalition coincided with a 350,000 b/d fall in production from the 10 Opec members subject to targets. Output from the Opec contingent was down to 24.1mn b/d in April, the lowest since January 2022, leaving it 1.3mn b/d below target (see table). Combined Opec+ production undershot the group's collective quota by about 2.4mn b/d.

Iraq's production declined by 200,000 b/d in April after Turkey halted piped Kirkuk deliveries from the Kurdistan Regional Government's (KRG) part of northern Iraq to the Mediterranean port of Ceyhan on 25 March. The decision was triggered by an international arbitration court ruling that Turkey had breached a 1973 pipeline agreement by allowing KRG oil to be exported without Baghdad's consent in 2014-18.

A deal between the KRG and Iraq's federal government in Baghdad in early April appeared to pave the way for Kirkuk exports to resume but the two sides have since struggled to resolve a number of technical difficulties. They should reach an agreement within "one to two weeks", Iraqi oil minister Hayan Abdulghani said on 3 May, although Iraqi prime minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani later suggested a restart hinges on Turkey.

Nigeria falters

Nigeria's recent upstream recovery faltered in April and production dropped for the first time in six months. Output of the country's Forcados grade was nearly 90,000 b/d lower at 160,000 b/d as a result of reduced pipeline flows that Shell attributed to crude theft. Production of Qua Iboe, Erha, Usan and Yoho was disrupted by industrial action that prompted ExxonMobil to declare force majeure at the four grades' respective loading terminals. Qua Iboe output fell by about 20,000 b/d on the month to 130,000 b/d, while Erha production declined by nearly 50,000 b/d.

Kuwaiti production declined following problems at the country's new 615,000 b/d al-Zour refinery. Two 205,000 b/d crude units at the refinery were shut in early April because of technical issues, although one of them returned to service in the final week of the month. A rise in exports from Kuwait failed to compensate for the drop in domestic refining demand. Higher production in Saudi Arabia, driven by increased exports, and Angola, following the end of maintenance at the Dalia floating production, storage and offloading vessel, only partly offset the declines in Nigeria and Kuwait.

Venezuelan production increased in April, despite turmoil affecting the country's upstream because of investigations into oil sector theft and a series of arrests, as well as continued government interference in the industry's operations. Output was higher in the main production regions, including the Orinoco extra-heavy oil belt and the western and eastern output divisions. Chevron told investors last week that its Venezuelan production could rise by 50pc this year from about 100,000 b/d at present.

Non-Opec crude productionmn b/d
AprMarApr target± target
Russia9.739.6010.48-0.75
Oman0.840.840.84-0.00
Azerbaijan0.530.520.68-0.16
Kazakhstan1.631.631.630.01
Malaysia0.390.390.57-0.18
Bahrain0.200.200.20-0.00
Brunei0.070.070.10-0.03
Sudan0.070.070.07-0.00
South Sudan0.150.130.120.02
Total non-Opec13.5913.4414.69-1.09
*revised
Opec wellhead productionmn b/d
AprMarApr target± target
Saudi Arabia10.5010.4510.480.02
Iraq4.154.354.43-0.28
Kuwait2.602.702.68-0.08
UAE3.003.023.02-0.02
Algeria1.011.011.010.00
Nigeria1.271.471.74-0.47
Angola1.070.971.46-0.39
Congo (Brazzaville)0.250.260.31-0.06
Gabon0.200.190.180.02
Equatorial Guinea0.060.040.12-0.06
Opec 1024.1124.4625.42-1.31
Iran2.702.65nana
Libya1.151.15nana
Venezuela0.750.70nana
Total Opec 13Ϯ28.7128.96nana
*revised
ϮIran, Libya and Venezuela are exempt from production targets
Opec+ productionmn b/d
AprMarApr target± target
Opec 1024.1124.4625.42-1.31
Non-Opec 913.5913.4414.69-1.09
Total37.7037.9040.10-2.40
*revised

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
14/05/24

Opec leaves 2024-25 supply, demand forecasts unchanged

Opec leaves 2024-25 supply, demand forecasts unchanged

London, 14 May (Argus) — Opec has left its global oil supply and demand forecasts for 2024-25 unchanged. Demand is projected to rise by 2.25mn b/d to 104.46mn b/d this year and by a further 1.85mn b/d to 106.31mn b/d next year, the group said in its latest Monthly Oil Market Report (MOMR). Minor adjustments were made within the 2024 quarters, reflecting actual data received and expected short-term developments. But the overall growth figure for the full year is the same as last month , with an upwards adjustment in Chinese oil demand, mainly in the first quarter, offset by downward revisions for OECD Americas and the Middle East. Opec introduced a new section in last month's MOMR outlining a liquids supply forecast for all countries outside the wider Opec+ alliance. It expects non-Opec+ supplies to grow by 1.23mn b/d to 52.96mn b/d in 2024 and by another 1.1mn b/d to 54.06mn b/d in 2025. This is unchanged from its previous projection. This year's non-Opec+ supply growth is driven by production increases in the US, Canada and Norway. Next year is supported by a further rise in output in the US and Canada, as well as higher production in Latin America. The supply and demand projections leave the call on Opec+ crude at 43.2mn b/d this year, rising to 44mn b/d in 2025. Opec+ production was 41mn b/d in April, according to an average of secondary sources that includes Argus . By James Keates Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

TMX oil specs inappropriate: Valero, Chevron


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

TMX oil specs inappropriate: Valero, Chevron

Calgary, 13 May (Argus) — Crude quality specifications on the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline in western Canada are not narrow enough and may prevent buyers in California from taking crude shipped on the recently commissioned system, according to two US refiners. The 590,000 b/d TMX pipeline was placed into service on 1 May, a welcome addition for both producers in Alberta and refiners on the Pacific rim, but the upper limits allowed for crude on the line relating to vapor pressure and Total Acid Number (TAN) are problematic, Chevron and Valero said in letters to the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) on 10 May. The specifications, as set out by Trans Mountain's rules and regulations, were already in place for the original 300,000 b/d crude pipeline, or Line 1, which also carries refined products that require a higher vapor pressure. TMX, or Line 2, will primarily cater to heavy crude shippers. But the vapor pressure limit of 103 kPa at 37.8°C on the new line is nearly 40pc higher than tanks allow, according to Valero. "High vapor pressure crude oil simply cannot be accepted in United States internal floating roof tanks," wrote Valero. The current limits are "wholly inappropriate" and will result in crude being transported through TMX that is not suitable for the west coast market. Chevron concurred that the specifications exceed the limit for storage tanks at its own California refineries in Richmond and El Segundo. "Failure to amend the TAN specification and vapor limits for TMPL may prevent Chevron from purchasing or processing crude from [Trans Mountain] for our California refineries," the company wrote. The letters were in support of a 12 April complaint by Canadian Natural Resources (CNRL) to the CER, requesting the regulator intervene. Fellow oil sands producers Suncor, Imperial Oil, MEG Energy and ConocoPhillips also wrote in support, as did industry groups Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (EPAC) and Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA). Current rules state crudes must have a TAN of less than 1.3mg KOH/g to be considered a Low TAN Dilbit, but that is "inappropriately high," according to CNRL, and should be brought down to the same 1.1mg KOH/g threshold set by other export pipelines. Cenovus and Plains Midstream wrote that the CER did not need to intervene as this was a commercial matter. "This is effectively a commercial dispute that should be dealt with between the sophisticated commercial entities involved," said Plains. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

Potential strike threatens Vancouver port again

Calgary, 13 May (Argus) — A labour dispute at the Canadian port of Vancouver could result in another work stoppage, less than a year after a strike disrupted the flow of more than C$10bn ($7.3bn) worth of goods and commodities ranging from canola and potash to coking coal. Negotiations between the British Columbia Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Ship and Dock Foremen Local 514 union have stalled as the two sides try to renew an agreement that expired on 1 April 2023. A 21-day "cooling-off period" concluded on 10 May, giving the union the right to strike and the employers association the right to lock out the workers. A vote and 72-hour notice would first need to occur before either action is taken. The BCMEA filed a formal complaint to the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) the same day, which had to step in last year in another dispute. The BCMEA locked horns with ILWU Canada over a separate collective agreement in 2023 leading to a 13-day strike by the union in July. This disrupted the movement of C$10.7bn of goods in and out of Canada, according to the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade. Vancouver's port is the country's largest — about the same size as the next five combined — and describes itself as able to handle the most diversified range of cargo in North America. There are 29 terminals belonging to the Port of Vancouver. Terminals that service container ships endured the most significant congestion during last year's strike. Loadings for potash, sulphur, lumber, wood pellets and pulp, steel-making coal, canola, copper concentrates, zinc and lead concentrate, diesel and renewable diesel liquids and some agri-foods were also disrupted. The Trans Mountain-operated Westridge Marine Terminal responsible for crude oil exports on Canada's west coast was unaffected. A deal was eventually reached on 4 August. The strike spurred on proposed amendments to legislation in Canada that would limit the effect of job action on essential services. A bill introduced in Canada's Parliament in November would update the Canada Labour Code and CIRB Regulations accordingly. The bill has been progressing through the House of Commons, now having completed the second of three readings. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Chevron books Aframax for TMX cargo to California


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

Chevron books Aframax for TMX cargo to California

Houston, 13 May (Argus) — Chevron provisionally hired an Aframax to haul a cargo of crude from Vancouver, British Columbia, to the US west coast as the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) brings more oil to Canada's Pacific coast. Chevron put the Aframax Garibaldi Spirit on subjects for a Vancouver-US west coast voyage loading from 25 May at WS125, market participants said. That rate is equivalent to $11.16/t or $1.63/bl for heavy sour Cold Lake, according to Argus data. The US west coast historically has been the main destination for crude exported from Vancouver, with 96pc, or about 38,500 b/d, landing at ports in Washington and California in the 12 months ended 30 April, according to data from analytics firm Vortexa. Chevron purchased five cargoes from Vancouver for its 269,000 b/d refinery in El Segundo, California, during that span, most recently in February. The 590,000 b/d TMX project began commercial service on 1 May, tripling the capacity of the Trans Mountain pipeline system to 890,000 b/d. The line creates a larger link from Alberta's growing oil sands production to the west coast port of Vancouver and direct access to Pacific Rim markets, where buyers are eager for heavy sour crude . The first TMX cargo, 550,000 bl of Canadian Access Western Blend which Suncor booked on an Aframax in late April , will load between 18-24 May for June delivery in China. PetroChina and Unipec each control an Aframax near Canada's Pacific coast that would be available to load in Vancouver in the second half of May, though those ships could also be relet to deliver crude to the US west coast. The port of Vancouver's distance from many traditional Aframax trading routes may stretch the global fleet once TMX ramps up. The port cannot accommodate tankers larger than Aframaxes. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

FTC flexes muscles over US oil mergers


13/05/24
News
13/05/24

FTC flexes muscles over US oil mergers

New York, 13 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulator the Federal Trade Commission's insistence that the former chief executive of independent Pioneer Natural Resources, Scott Sheffield, be barred from ExxonMobil's board as a condition of approving their $64.5bn merger serves as a cautionary tale for other pending deals. The FTC alleged that Sheffield, a long-time industry leader who made Pioneer one of the biggest producers in the Permian, sought to collude with Opec. It cited hundreds of text messages in which he discussed pricing and output with officials from the oil cartel, as well as efforts to co-ordinate with other Texas producers. The fallout for other transactions still going through the approvals process may be limited, given the specific nature of the allegations against Sheffield, but the FTC's action shows the agency will not hesitate to demand concessions in order to wave deals through. Given heightened political sensitivities to fuel prices in an election year, that should put the industry on notice. At the very least, future reviews are likely to include requests to turn over any records — electronic or otherwise — that involve discussions with competitors or other oil-producing jurisdictions, according to former FTC chairman Bill Kovacic. "It's a reminder that conversations with your competitors about production levels and pricing levels are exceedingly unwise," Kovacic says. It was significant that the FTC did not tamper with the basic fundamentals of the Pioneer acquisition. "I suspect the former CEO is unhappy about being placed on the sidelines," he says. But it is also a "relatively inexpensive price to pay for getting this done". Under the leadership of Lina Khan, the FTC has taken a tougher line when it comes to mergers, and second requests for information have become the norm when it comes to oil deals. Chevron's planned $53bn acquisition of US independent Hess has been held up by such a request, even as a dispute over the target company's stake in a giant offshore find in Guyana has cast a cloud over the transaction. Diamondback Energy's announced $26bn takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources was also subject to a second request. Occidental Petroleum chief executive Vicki Hollub told analysts in February that "some of our teams felt like [the FTC] asked for everything" when going through the approval process for the company's $12bn purchase of CrownRock. But Occidental said this week that its teams are working "constructively" with the regulator, and that the deal is expected to close in the third quarter. Consolidation over consumers? The rapid pace of consolidation in the US oil and gas sector since late last year has led to mounting calls for increased scrutiny on antitrust grounds. "Let's not kid ourselves, these mergers aren't just about efficiency or lowering costs," US Senate Democratic majority leader Chuck Schumer wrote in a letter signed by 50 Senate and House Democrats in March. They are about "buying out the competition so the newly consolidated industry can boost profits at the expense of consumers". Given long-serving company executives' preference to stick around after selling their firms, the FTC's action in relation to Pioneer could theoretically dissuade other ‘big-name' founders from going down the same road, consultancy Rystad senior analyst Matthew Bernstein says. On the other hand, the loss of control for family-owned operators has already served as a big enough obstacle for some companies that would otherwise be seen as takeover targets. As for Sheffield, Pioneer has said the FTC's complaint reflects a "fundamental misunderstanding" of US and global oil markets and "misreads the nature and intent" of his actions. Pioneer more than doubled its daily production between 2019 and 2023, playing its part in adding to domestic energy supply, the firm said. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more