Asian HSFO flips into contango on lack of summer demand
Singapore 180cst high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) markets have flipped into contango mainly as typical South Asian summer utility demand has failed to materialise, market participants said.
The front-forward month timespread flipped from a $0.25/t backwardation on 6 June to a contango of -$1/t on 7 June and remained there on 8 June, according to Argus' assessments. This was the first time in over three months that markets were in contango, having last been there at -$1.25/t on 14 February. The current contango is slightly deeper than the -$0.65/t average in June 2022 compared to the $0.15/t backwardation in June 2021.
Singapore 180cst HSFO margins also weakened to -$9.66/bl against Dubai crude values on 8 June, much lower than averages between -$2.67/bl to -$5.99/bl during the second quarters of 2019-2022.
180cst HSFO markets weakened because of a lack of usual demand from major buyers Pakistan and Bangladesh to meet cooling needs in summer, owing to availability of alternative fuel LNG as well as financing issues, traders said. Fuel oil demand for industrial needs in Pakistan has also fallen as a result of an economic slowdown and inflation-related issues, a source close to Pakistan's state-owned marketer PSO said. PSO has not bought fuel oil since October 2022.
Just 43,200t of HSFO is projected to arrive in Bangladesh in June so far, and zero in Pakistan and Sri Lanka, the lowest monthly arrivals on record to those countries since at least June 2020, according to data from oil analytics firm Vortexa.
Pakistan has also offered rare fuel oil cargoes from its 100,000 b/d Pak-Arab refinery (Parco) and Pakistan Refinery (PRL) since late last year, because of high domestic inventories — and some volumes have arrived in Singapore, according to Vortexa data, likely adding to weakness in markets.
Pakistan and Bangladesh are also not importing much LNG for summer as they have sufficient domestic gas supplies, market participants said. Credit issues have also deterred Pakistan from importing LNG.
LNG market participants are waiting to see if Bangladesh's state-controlled Rupantarita Prakritik Gas (RPGCL) will award its latest tenders issued this week seeking two cargoes for delivery over 10-11 July and 23-24 July. The tenders will close on 11 June.
While LNG prices have fallen significantly — with the Argus-assessed price for deliveries to India and the Middle East for first-half July being at over two-year lows of $8.385/mn Btu on 8 June — the two south Asian countries could be counting on the potential for prices to ease further before firming up their summer demand.
Related news posts
Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option
Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option
New York, 16 May (Argus) — Ship owners are ordering new vessels equipped with methanol-burning capabilities, largely in response to tightening carbon emissions regulations in Europe. But despite the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings that low-carbon methanol provides, it cannot currently compete on price with grey methanol or conventional marine fuels. Ship owners operate 33 methanol-fueled vessels today and have another 29 on order through the end of the year, according to vessel classification society DNV. All 62 vessels are oil and chemical tankers. DNV expects a total of 281 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028, of which 165 will be container ships, 19 bulk carrier and 14 car carrier vessels. Argus Consulting expects an even bigger build-out, with more than 300 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028. A methanol configured dual-fuel vessel has the option to burn conventional marine fuel or any type of methanol: grey or low-carbon. Grey methanol is made from natural gas or coal. Low-carbon methanol includes biomethanol, made of sustainable biomass, and e-methanol, produced by combining green hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. The fuel-switching capabilities of the dual-fuel vessels provide ship owners with a natural price hedge. When methanol prices are lower than conventional bunkers the ship owner can burn methanol, and vice versa. Methanol, with its zero-sulphur emissions, is advantageous in emission control areas (ECAs), such as the US and Canadian territorial waters. In ECAs, the marine fuel sulphur content is capped at 0.1pc, and ship owners can burn methanol instead of 0.1pc sulphur maximum marine gasoil (MGO). In the US Gulf coast, the grey methanol discount to MGO was $23/t MGO-equivalent average in the first half of May. The grey methanol discount averaged $162/t MGOe for all of 2023. Starting this year, ship owners travelling within, in and out of European territorial waters are required to pay for 40pc of their CO2 emissions through the EU emissions trading system. Next year, ship owners will be required to pay for 70pc of their CO2 emissions. Separately, ship owners will have to reduce their vessels' lifecycle GHG intensities, starting in 2025 with a 2pc reduction and gradually increasing to 80pc by 2050, from a 2020 baseline. The penalty for exceeding the GHG emission intensity is set by the EU at €2,400/t ($2,596/t) of very low-sulplhur fuel oil equivalent. Even though these regulations apply to EU territorial waters, they affect ship owners travelling between the US and Europe. Despite the lack of sulphur emissions, grey methanol generates CO2. With CO2 marine fuel shipping regulations tightening, ship owners have turned their sights to low-carbon methanol. But US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol was priced at $2,317/t MGOe in the first half of May, nearly triple the outright price of MGO at $785/t. Factoring in the cost of 70pc of CO2 emissions and the GHG intensity penalty, the US Gulf coast MGO would rise to about $857/t. At this MGO level, the US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol would be 2.7 times the price of MGO. By comparison, grey methanol with added CO2 emissions cost would be around $962/t, or 1.1 times the price of MGO. To mitigate the high low-carbon methanol costs, some ship owners have been eyeing long-term agreements with suppliers to lock in product availabilities and cheaper prices available on the spot market. Danish container ship owner Maersk has lead the way, entering in low-carbon methanol production agreements in the US with Proman, Orsted, Carbon Sink, and SunGaas Renewables. These are slated to come on line in 2025-27. Global upcoming low-carbon methanol projects are expected to produce 16mn t by 2027, according to industry trade association the Methanol Institute, up from two years ago when the institute was tracking projects with total capacity of 8mn t by 2027. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Europe receives straight run fuel oil from Dangote
Europe receives straight run fuel oil from Dangote
London, 15 May (Argus) — A cargo of low-sulphur straight run fuel oil (LSSR) produced at Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery has been delivered to Europe for the first time. The 90,000t cargo was loaded at Dangote's terminal in Lekki on 25 April and discharged in Rotterdam on 13 May, according to data from trade analytics firm Kpler. The cargo will likely be used as a blendstock to produce very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO), market participants said. Roughly 72pc of the fuel oil exported from Dangote has been delivered to the US since the refinery offered its first LSSR export tender in mid-February . A total of just under 620,000t has been delivered so far. Another LSSR shipment of 83,400t departed the refinery on 7 May, according to trade analytics firm Vortexa. It is scheduled to arrive in France on 22 May, but market participants say this is unlikely to be the cargo's final destination. LSSR price assessments on a fob Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) basis have stayed at a $5/bl premium to front-month Ice Brent crude futures this week, narrowing from an 18-month high of $7.50/bl in mid-April . Maintenance work that began in the first quarter affected fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units at some refineries. FCCs take LSSR and low-sulphur vacuum gasoil to increase gasoline yields. By Isabella Reimi and Bob Wigin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Chinese importers seek five LNG cargoes for Jun-Sep
Chinese importers seek five LNG cargoes for Jun-Sep
Shanghai, 15 May (Argus) — Five Chinese importers, mostly second-tier buyers, are each seeking one LNG cargo for June-September delivery, according to an official notice published by China's national pipeline operator PipeChina on 15 May. The five importers are PipeChina, Chinese independent ENN, Hong Kong-listed city gas firm China Resources Gas, Hong Kong-based Towngas and state-owned China Gas. PipeChina and ENN have indicated a target price of at most $9.50/mn Btu for their intended cargoes, both for delivery to PipeChina's 6mn t/yr Tianjin terminal. China Gas has indicated a target price of at most $9.30/mn Btu for delivery to PipeChina's 6mn t/yr Beihai termial. China Resources Gas and Towngas have both indicated a target price of at most $9/mn Btu for delivery to PipeChina's 2mn t/yr Yuedong and Tianjin terminals, respectively. This consolidated requirement came about because of a need for PipeChina to better leverage on its infrastructure advantages and, at the same time, meet the varying needs of gas importers and consumers in the country. But this requirement comes at a time when spot LNG prices are still somewhat higher than the importers' targeted prices. But the importers can choose not to buy if offers are not within their expectations. The front-half month of the ANEA, the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia, was last assessed at $10.485/mn Btu on 15 May. Chinese importers mostly perceive spot prices below $9-9.50/mn Btu for June-September deliveries to be unattainable for now because there is strong buying interest from south and southeast Asia in particular. Indian state-controlled refiner IOC most recently bought LNG for delivery between 22 May and 15 June at around $10.60/mn Btu, through a tender that closed on 14 May. Thailand's state-controlled PTT most recently bought three deliveries for 9-10 July, 16-17 July and 22-23 July through a tender that closed on 13 May , at just slightly above $10.50/mn Btu. The most recent spot transaction was Japanese utility Tohoku Electric's purchase of a 10-30 June delivery at around $10.55/mn Btu through a tender that closed on 14 May . This is at least $1/mn Btu higher than Chinese importers' indications. Summer requirements have so far been muted but concerns among buyers about potential supply disruptions remain. Malaysia's 30mn t/yr Bintulu LNG export terminal suffered a power loss on 10 May, but this issue may have been resolved as of early on 15 May, according to offtakers. Some unspecified upstream issues may still be affecting production at the Bintulu facility, resulting in Malaysia's state-owned Petronas having to ask some of its buyers for cargo deferments, according to offtakers. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Singapore’s bunker sales hit 10-month low in April
Singapore’s bunker sales hit 10-month low in April
Singapore, 15 May (Argus) — Singapore's April bunker sales fell to a 10-month low on weak very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) demand. But consumption of high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) and B24 biofuel bunkers remained firm. Singapore VLSFO bunker sales fell to at least a 15-month low of 2.25mn t in April, according to data from the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore. This came because of slower demand as more buyers turned to lower-priced HSFO. Singapore HSFO sales accounted for a 42pc share of total fuel oil sales in April, up from a 31pc share a year earlier. Disruptions in the Red Sea led to increased fuel usage by ocean-going vessels with higher rates of scrubber technology adoption, raising demand for HSFO by a greater extent than for VLSFO. Consumption of bio-blended VLSFO, or B24, climbed by 61pc on the year because buying interest gained traction, but slipped by 10pc from strong consumption in March . LNG bunker sales rose by over sixfold on the year but edged down from a record high in March . By Cassia Teo and Asill Bardh Singapore bunker sales 000t Apr-24 m-o-m ± % y-o-y ± % Jan-Apr 2024 ± % Low-sulphur fuel oil (LSFO) 2,252 -6.9 -16 10,088 -2.2 Marine fuel oil (MFO) 1,600 0.0 31 6,466 32 Low-sulphur MGO (LSMGO) 277 -11.0 -11 1,201 -3.0 Bio-blended LSFO 60 -10.0 61 186 53 Liquified natural gas (LNG) 36 -7.9 582 111 N/A MGO 9.7 88.0 -37 43 -9.2 Marine diesel oil (MDO) 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended MDO 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended marine gasoil (MGO) 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended LSMGO 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended MFO 0.0 N/A -100 0.0 -100 Ultra low sulphur fuel oil (ULSFO) 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Bio-blended ULSFO 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Methanol 0.0 N/A N/A 0.0 N/A Total 4,235 -4.7 -0.6 18,096 8.9 Source: MPA Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more