Japan to fund seven projects to advance CCS strategy
Japan's state-owned energy agency Jogmec has selected seven potential carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects for its financial support, aiming to accelerate the development and utilisation of the technology to drive the country's decarbonisation.
The cross-industry winners of the seven projects, comprising five domestic and two overseas projects, are to begin test drilling from the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year and confirm how much the projects will be able to store carbon dioxide (CO2). They are likely to make a final investment decision in 2026-27. Japan is aiming to start commercial CCS business from 2030-31 with its current CCS roadmap.
The seven projects, which aim to expand hub and cluster businesses and cut costs, are projected to store a combined 13mn t/yr of CO2. The projects include those that can store 1.5mn t/yr of CO2 in north Japan's Hokkaido's Tomakomai, 2mn t/yr in the Sea of Japan side of Tohoku, 1.5mn t/yr in Higashi-Niigata, 1mn t/yr in the Metropolitan area and 3mn t/yr in the Kyusyu region, along with 2mn t/yr offshore Malaysia and 2mn t/yr in an unspecified area of Australasia.
This is the government's first financial support for CCS. It is still unclear how much Jogmec will finance each project, depending on future negotiations with the winning consortiums. The trade and industry ministry (Meti) has allocated around ¥3.5bn ($25mn) in its 2023-24 initial budget to support advanced CCS projects through Jogmec.
Japan plans to achieve CO2 storage capacity of 6mn-12mn t/yr by 2030 so that the country can start its CCS business from 2030. Tokyo aims to store 120mn-240mn t/yr of CO2 by 2050, after adding the 6mn-12mn t/yr of capacity over 20 years from 2030. Meti has estimated the country could store around 70pc of 240mn t/yr of CO2 in 2050 through the domestic projects, if it could develop 20-25 areas, including the selected five domestic areas.
Japan would need to deploy CCS and carbon capture, utilisation and storage technology to offset CO2 emissions that cannot be removed in sectors such as power, refinery, steel, chemical, cement and paper production sites. Japan aims to cut its greenhouse gas emissions to 760mn t by 2030-31, down from 1.2mn t in 2019-20.
Jogmec last year expanded its funding coverage to CCS projects, as well as hydrogen and ammonia, to help reduce domestic firms' risk exposure.
| Japan CCS projects selected by Jogmec | ||
| Consortium | CO2 storage capacity (mn t) | |
| Tomakomai | Japex, Hokkaido Electric Power, Idemitsu | 1.5 |
| Tokyo metropolitan | Inpex, Nippon Steel, Kanto Natural Gas Development | 1.0 |
| Sea of Japan, Tohoku | Itochu, Nippon Steel, Taiheiyo Cement, Inpex, MHI, Taisei | 2.0 |
| Higashi Niigata | Japex, Tohoku Electric Power, Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Hokuetsu, NRI | 1.5 |
| Kyushu | Eneos, JX, J-Power | 3.0 |
| Offshore Malaysia | Mitsui | 2.0 |
| Australasia | Mitsubishi, Nippon Steel, ExxonMobil Asia Pacific | 2.0 |
| Source: Jogmec |
Related news posts
US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22
US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22
Washington, 14 May (Argus) — A federal appeals court has affirmed biofuel blending requirements for 2020-22 under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), rejecting lawsuits from refineries and renewable fuel producers challenging the standards. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acted within its authority in the rule when it revised the biofuel blending targets to account for small refinery exemptions it expected it would award in the future, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said today in a 2-1 ruling. The court rejected a complaint by refineries that argued EPA could only revise the annual biofuel blending targets based on exemptions it had already approved in the past. "The statute does not confine EPA to the Refiner Petitioners' preferred method of accounting for small refinery exemptions," DC Circuit judge Cornelia Pillard wrote on behalf of the majority. "EPA's choice to account for them both retrospectively and prospectively is not arbitrary or capricious." The ruling leaves intact a 2022 rule that required renewable fuel blending to increase to 20.63bn USG by 2022, up from 17.13bn USG in 2020. For the first time under the RFS, the rule used a new formula that tried to avoid a recurrent issue under which EPA failed to account for upcoming requests from small refineries for exemptions from the RFS. EPA has subsequently decided to start denying all small refinery exemptions, under a new argument that small refiners do not face a disproportionate hardship from complying with the RFS. But if the courts throw out that finding in a pending lawsuit , the formula at issue in today's court ruling could take on a greater relevance for how EPA accounts for small refinery exemptions when setting biofuel blending targets. The DC Circuit rejected a separate lawsuit by cellulosic ethanol producers that said EPA should have required increased blending of cellulosic ethanol, based in part on the availability of carryover compliance credits. The court found EPA had adequate authority to waive volumetric targets set by the US Congress in 2007 based on its finding there were inadequate domestic supplies of the fuel, which is produced from plant fibers. Judge Gregory Katsas, who dissented from the ruling, said he believed the biofuel blending requirements for 2022 were set "arbitrarily high." Katsas cited EPA's finding that those standards would impose an estimated $5.7bn in additional costs for fuel but only deliver $160mn in energy security benefits. Katsas also faulted EPA for increasing the biofuel blending targets by 250mn USG in 2022 to "cancel out a legal error" from biofuel blending targets in 2016. Katsas said there was no authority to transfer volume requirements from one year to another. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan’s Idemitsu invests in US e-methanol producer HIF
Japan’s Idemitsu invests in US e-methanol producer HIF
Osaka, 13 May (Argus) — Japanese refiner Idemitsu is investing in US synthetic fuel (e-fuel) producer HIF Global to develop a supply chain of e-methanol, as part of a strategy to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Idemitsu said on 13 May that it has agreed to spend $114mn to secure an undisclosed stake in HIF after the US firm issued new shares. HIF is expected to produce around 4mn t/yr of e-methanol equivalent by 2030 at its production sites in Australia, North America and South America. E-methanol is typically made from green hydrogen and carbon dioxide (CO2). This is used as an alternative bunker fuel and as a feedstock for synthetic fuels, including gasoline, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and diesel, as well as synthetic chemicals. Idemitsu is focusing on e-methanol, along with blue ammonia and SAF, as its investment targets to achieve net zero by 2050. The company aims to set up 500,000 t/yr of e-methanol supplies in domestic and overseas markets in 2035 by using its existing oil supply and sales networks. The target includes unspecified volumes from HIF, possible production in the Middle East and domestic output, Idemitsu said. The deal follows Idemitsu's initial agreement with HIF in March 2023 to work on production and promotion of e-fuels, along with a decision to buy e-methanol from HIF and jointly study the possible development of the fuel. Idemitsu also agreed an initial deal with HIF and Japanese shipping firm Mitsui OSK Line to explore opportunities to develop an e-fuel and e-methanol supply chain between Japan and where HIF's e-fuel and e-methanol production plants are located, including CO2 transportation from Japan to HIF's production sites. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Spanish ceramics sector worried about H2 supply, cost
Spanish ceramics sector worried about H2 supply, cost
London, 10 May (Argus) — Supply limitations and high prices of renewable hydrogen will pose a challenge to the Spanish ceramics sector's decarbonisation goals, according to an industry association. Companies in the sector are mulling the use of renewable hydrogen in their operations, "but it is a real challenge because of the volume that we need and the cost", the general secretary of Spain's association of ceramic tile and flooring manufacturers (ASCER), Alberto Echavarria, told Argus . The industry currently consumes around 15TWh/yr of natural gas, accounting for nearly 10pc of Spain's industrial gas demand. This would equate to around 380,000 t/yr of hydrogen, based on the higher heating value of 39.39kWh/kg. And it would not be far off the 500,000 t/yr of conventional hydrogen made from natural gas with unabated emissions that Spanish industry as a whole consumes currently. Making 380,000 t/yr could require some 4GW of electrolyser capacity for the ceramics industry alone, equivalent to over one-third of Spain's 2030 target of 11GW . In any event, existing technology can support no more than 10pc hydrogen blending in the kilns, Echavarria said. ASCER is in talks with kiln manufacturers developing hydrogen-ready ovens, but these are in a testing phase and are not expected to be available at industrial scale in the near future. Alternatives for decarbonisation are thin on the ground. Electrifying operations is not a viable option, Echavarria said. While some parts of the ceramic production process can run on electricity, the industry ovens, known as kilns, fire at temperatures reaching 1,200°C, which are much too high for electricity. And the kilns represent 50-60pc of the sector's energy consumption, according to Echavarria. Another alternative would be to use biomethane or e-methane, at least until hydrogen-fired kilns reach industrial scale. This approach would require minor modifications in facilities and would allow them to continue using the current infrastructure and distribution system. But biomethane is also only available in small volumes, and making e-methane requires electrolytic hydrogen, raising the same issues over supply availability and costs as direct hydrogen use. Net emissions could also be reduced by implementing carbon capture technology but this would be even less cost-competitive, Echavarria said. It would require mechanisms to concentrate CO2 molecules at a focal point, which is an expensive undertaking, he said. Piping hot Future hydrogen use for ceramics production would depend on connections to a hydrogen pipeline system. Spain's ceramics industry, which is the largest in Europe, is mainly concentrated in Castellon, where more than 150 facilities are based. It is not practical to "have 150 electrolysers" and produce locally, Echavarria said, not least because the plants would need round-the-clock hydrogen supply to maintain the high temperatures. ASCER has been collaborating with Spanish gas system operator Enagas on plans for the development of the Spanish hydrogen backbone to ensure access for its companies, he said. Firms have also looked into sourcing hydrogen via trucks, according to Echavarria. But this would require storage facilities, raising costs and safety concerns. By Pamela Machado Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Norway urged to follow EU laws to ensure H2 exports
Norway urged to follow EU laws to ensure H2 exports
London, 10 May (Argus) — Norway has extremely favourable conditions for renewable and low-carbon hydrogen production and harbours ambitions of becoming a major exporter to the EU. But the country's hesitation to adopt EU laws could hamper the sector's development, an industry body has warned. The country has ample potential for renewables including hydroelectricity, natural gas reserves and offshore CO2 storage opportunities . Nearly 60 hydrogen projects are planned with potential production capacity by 2030 reaching 6.6GW from electrolysis and the equivalent of 5.4GW from gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS), according to data from industry body Norsk Hydrogenforum (NHF) — although it remains to be seen how many projects will be built by then. The potential for CCS-enabled hydrogen could even exceed current plans, and a proposed Norway-Germany hydrogen pipeline could eventually carry 4mn t/yr, according to a feasibility study last year, although infrastructure would be shared with other North Sea production sites. But Oslo must implement certain EU rules to maintain free trade access to the single market for Norwegian companies as it is not a member of the bloc. Almost 500 EU legal acts are waiting to be incorporated into Norway's European Economic Area (EEA) agreement with Brussels, including 65 related to energy, according to NHF secretary general Ingeborg Telnes Wilhelmsen. Norway's obligation to EU energy rules has become a political debate in the country, pitting arguments about sovereignty against single market access and leaving the hydrogen sector in limbo. "The hydrogen industry in Norway is highly international, and about two thirds of the turnover is export related," NHF has said. "Sharing the same regulatory framework as the rest of Europe is therefore important to ensure a level playing field for Norwegian companies". NHF has urged Oslo to speed up implementation of the EU's revised renewable energy directive (RED III). RED III targets for 42pc of hydrogen used in industry to be renewable by 2030 are "very demanding", but achievable, according to the association. If Norway's renewable renewable hydrogen output gets anywhere near NHF's projections, the country should comfortably meet the target and still have spare supply for exports and other domestic offtaker sectors, such as transport. Norway consumes around 225,000 t/yr of fossil fuel-gas hydrogen, meaning the target would translate to just under 95,000 t/yr, NHF has said. Certification worries Norwegian hydrogen producers could face difficulties certifying their renewable hydrogen to EU standards unless the country adopts the bloc's legal texts, NHF has warned. Compliance with Brussels' definition of renewable hydrogen should be relatively easy, because renewable power exceeds 90pc in four out of five of Norway's electricity bidding zones, thanks to the high penetration of hydropower. Producers would be free from rules on additionality, temporal and geographical correlation and would not need power purchase agreements . But the delegated act has not yet been incorporated into the EEA agreement and this complicated matters for Norwegian participants in the recent European hydrogen bank pilot auction, NHF said. The EU could theoretically even exclude Norwegian companies from the scheme going forward, if legal texts are not adopted, NHF has warned. That said, multiple Norwegian projects submitted eligible bids including developer Fuella which was among seven companies that won subsidies in the pilot . Funding schemes: you win some you lose some Access to the hydrogen bank looks particularly vital for Norwegian projects now that plans for a domestic contracts-for-difference (CfD) mechanism for renewable hydrogen have stalled. The coalition government discussed a CfD scheme with other political parties during budget negotiations last year, but they could not agree on funding, Telnes Wilhelmsen said, although she noted that there still might be a way back. "We lost the first battle about CfDs but it doesn't mean we give up," she said. Norwegian electrolysis projects can benefit from government-subsidised power prices, which has a "huge impact," one Norwegian hydrogen developer told Argus . Norway recently increased the budget for its so-called "CO2 compensation scheme," which trims power prices for its energy-intensive companies, to 7bn krone/yr ($646mn) and scrapped the price floor. The scheme aims to ensure that prices for clean Norwegian power are not unfairly driven higher by Brussels' emissions trading scheme (ETS), as Norway's electricity market is linked to the EU's. Oslo has also announced several broader support schemes for clean energy including NKr5bn for high-risk loans and grants for green industry, NKr1.5bn to reduce emissions in energy-intensive industry, and NKr285mn for zero-emission trucks. But the relevance of these for the hydrogen sector is "still unclear," Telnes Wilhelmsen said. By Aidan Lea Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more