Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US rebuffs oil sector push for broad tariff exclusions

  • Market: Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 19/03/18

US oil and gas companies hoping to avoid President Donald Trump's looming 25pc steel tariff will have to separately request exemptions for each type of product they import and may wait months to get a decision.

The US Commerce Department detailed its exclusion process today, before the steel tariff and a 10pc aluminum tariff go into effect on 23 March. The exclusion rules disappointed many industry officials who wanted broad exclusions for similar products and the ability for trade organizations to seek exemptions for multiple companies.

Oil and gas companies will be able to seek tariff exemptions immediately. But an individual company will have to show the product they are importing is not adequately available in the US or is needed for national security to qualify. US steel and aluminum producers will have the option of trying to block an exemption by objecting within 30 days, and tariff exemptions will generally only last for a year.

Commerce says it expects to make decisions on product exclusion requests within 90 days. But one industry official worries the exemption process could turn into a "paperwork nightmare" as hundreds of companies go through the process of seeking exemptions for each product that has distinct dimensions and coatings. Another industry official wonders if Commerce has enough staff to process the coming "influx" of exemption requests and objections.

A product exemption granted for one company will not automatically transfer to other companies, Commerce said, unless the agency approves a broad exclusion. This creates the risk that small oil and gas companies will "bear the brunt of the increased costs" because they lack the resources to file tariff exemption paperwork, the Independent Petroleum Association of America said.

"Costs are going to go up for the US oil and natural gas industry," the group said. "We are already starting to see that happen and we are particularly concerned this tariff may cause shortages of specialty parts."

The pipeline group the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America said it was concerned there could be "delays and uncertainty" if Commerce requires each company to apply for a product-specific exclusion instead of approving a broad exclusion.

Oil and gas companies argue that the tariffs will undermine Trump's push for "energy dominance" by increasing domestic production. The industry trade group LNG Allies on 14 March had asked Commerce to provide a "full, complete and immediate exemption" by today to make sure proposed liquefaction projects in the US remain competitive. The group did not immediately respond for comment.

ExxonMobil chief executive Darren Wood, Chevron chief executive Mike Wirth and nearly a dozen other oil industry executives went to the White House to meet with Trump on 15 March, one week after the tariffs were announced. The American Petroleum Institute, which arranged the meeting, said the executives discussed trade policy as one of their top issues but declined to say if tariffs were discussed.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
20/01/25

EU Feb stock targets lower for some states: Correction

EU Feb stock targets lower for some states: Correction

Corrects figures in paragraphs six and seven and in table London, 20 January (Argus) — EU gas stock targets for 1 February 2025 are much lower for five member states eligible for derogations, with Austria seeing the greatest difference. The European Commission last week published new intermediary storage targets for 2025 that apply to all EU member states with storage capacity. But five countries — Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia and Slovakia — benefit from derogations to the targets, as their storage capacities are large relative to domestic consumption and therefore they would be "disproportionately affected by the obligation", according to the 2022 EU legislation. The derogation sets their 1 November fill target at 35pc of annual consumption over the past five years, and this figure then can be used to calculate intermediary targets. February storage targets for derogating countries can be calculated by multiplying the EU's original 1 February 2025 target by 35pc of domestic consumption over the previous five years, then dividing this figure by 90pc, the Austrian energy ministry explained to Argus . Argus used this formula to calculate the 1 February targets for all five derogating countries, assuming for ease of calculation that consumption in 2024 would be unchanged from 2023 ( see table ). By far the largest difference between the EU's target and Argus ' calculated target is in Austria, where storage capacity of nearly 102TWh far exceeded annual consumption in 2023. The EU's listed target of 64pc would correspond to 65TWh of stocks, while Argus ' calculations put the derogated February target at 22.1TWh, roughly one-third of the original target. Given that the Austrian state stills holds a 20TWh reserve, 19.46TWh of which is stored in Austria and the other 540GWh in Slovakia, the reserve alone would nearly meet the country's adjusted 1 February target and already exceed the estimated 1 May target of around 18TWh. The Netherlands also benefits from a derogation, but under different conditions than those of Austria. Clause 3 of Article 6a in the EU's 2022 storage regulations — rather than clause 2 like the other five countries — reduces the 90pc storage target by the volume of gas exported to third countries during the October-April withdrawal period in 2016-21. The Netherlands' EU-mandated 1 November 2024 target required a 74pc stockfill, but the government chose to set a more ambitious target of 90pc anyway. Similarly for 2025, the Dutch EU target is 74pc for 1 November, but the government set a higher target of 80pc, the Dutch climate ministry told Argus . This analysis excludes the Netherlands as its derogation differs quantitatively from that of the other five countries. By Brendan A'Hearn Calculated storage targets for 1 Feb 2025 Storage cap in TWh Annex target in pc Annex target in TWh 35pc of annual consumption 2020-24 in TWh (assumed) Calculated target in pc* Calculated target in TWh Diff in TWh AT 101.6 64.0 65.0 30.6 21.8 22.1 -42.9 SK 37.0 45.0 16.7 17.1 8.6 3.2 -13.5 HU 68.0 59.0 40.1 36.1 23.7 16.1 -24.0 LV 25.0 45.0 11.3 3.4 1.7 0.4 -10.8 CZ 45.2 40.0 18.1 29.6 13.2 6.0 -12.1 Total 151.1 47.8 -103.3 *calculated by multiplying the annex percentage by 35pc of annual consumption in 2020-24, then dividing by 90pc Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Canada's Trans Mountain investigating capacity increase


17/01/25
News
17/01/25

Canada's Trans Mountain investigating capacity increase

Calgary, 17 January (Argus) — The operator behind Trans Mountain's 890,000 b/d pipeline system in western Canada is looking into increasing its capacity as export congestion looms, while threatened US tariffs may prompt the country to re-examine its broader pipeline strategy. "We have started to identify and investigate opportunities that could improve the throughput efficiency of the system and increase capacity of the pipeline — ideally in the next four to five years," Trans Mountain told Argus on Friday. Federally-owned Trans Mountain would not say how much of an increase it was contemplating, but any plans would be subject to thorough regulatory reviews and approval before proceeding. The system connects producers in oil-rich Alberta to the docks at Burnaby, British Columbia, and its capacity was roughly tripled when the 590,000 b/d Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) was placed into service in May 2024. The increased system has been a popular outlet for shippers, both for selling to US West coast refiners, but also for producers looking to bypass the US altogether and target Asian countries. Trans Mountain is expected to be full by 2028, chief executive Mark Maki told a parliamentary committee in October , as are other lines which have operators like Enbridge also looking to up egress capacity. The laying of new pipe may not necessarily be a big part of these increases as both are looking at making their systems more efficient. TMX is expected to cost about C$34bn ($24bn) after enduring regulatory delays, political and environmental resistance, court orders, wildfires, floods, Covid-19 measures, and rising labor costs caused by competing pipelines since being proposed in 2013. Other proposed export pipelines like Enbridge's 525,000 b/d Northern Gateway and TC Energy's 1.1mn b/d Energy East did not get past the approval stage under a federal Liberal government. Alberta premier Danielle Smith on 16 January called on Canada to "immediately start construction on the Northern Gateway and Energy East pipelines" to decrease the country's reliance on US customers in the wake of threatened tariffs by president-elect Donald Trump. Prime minister Justin Trudeau and all Canadian premiers, except Smith, have not ruled out the use of Canada's energy — most of which comes from Alberta — in retaliation to US tariffs. Smith has been labeled by some as not being part of a unified front for Canada, but she questions where the "Team Canada" approach has been in the past, citing suffocating regulations for the energy industry and decades of transfer payments made to Quebec, Ontario and the Maritime provinces at the expense of Alberta taxpayers. There is precedent for Smith's concerns, referencing a clash between Alberta and prime minister Pierre Trudeau, Justin's father, in 1973 when a federal tax was imposed on Canadian oil exported to the US amid the Arab oil embargo. Conflict peaked again in the early 1980s when the Trudeau government introduced its National Energy Program, which included price controls on domestic oil. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

IMF upgrades global growth outlook


17/01/25
News
17/01/25

IMF upgrades global growth outlook

Washington, 17 January (Argus) — The IMF is taking a slightly more upbeat view of the prospects for the global economy, revising upward its expectations for the US economy. But IMF officials are warning about the potential for higher inflation in the US if president-elect Donald Trump follows through with his threats to impose broad tariffs on all US imports from Canada, Mexico and China. "Higher tariffs or immigration curbs will play out like negative supply shocks, reducing output and adding to price pressures," IMF head of research Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas said. In an update to its World Economic Outlook released today, the IMF projected the global economy will grow by what it called a "stable, albeit lackluster rate" of 3.3pc this year and again by 3.3pc in 2026. The IMF's new 2025 outlook is 0.1 percentage points higher than its 3.2pc forecast in its October report. The IMF expects the US economy, spurred by continued strength in domestic demand, to grow by 2.7pc this year, a 0.5 percentage point increase from its forecast in October. China's economy is projected to grow by 4.6pc this year, up by 0.1 percentage point from the IMF's October forecast. The euro area is expected to grow by 1pc. Last year, the world economy grew by an estimated 3.2pc, compared with 3.3pc in 2023, the IMF said. IMF forecasts are used by many economists, including at the Paris-based energy watchdog IEA, to model oil demand projections. Global inflation is expected to decline to 4.2pc this year and 3.5pc in 2026, with pricing pressures easing in advanced economies more quickly than in emerging and developing economies. Gourinchas noted that while it is difficult to quantify the effects of the policy changes Trump has vowed to implement, "they are likely to push inflation higher in the near term" relative to the IMF's baseline. Looser fiscal policy or deregulation would stimulate demand and increase inflation, as spending and investment rise. "A combination of surging demand and shrinking supply would likely reignite US price pressures, though the effect on economic output in the near term would be ambiguous," Gourinchas said. IMF executive director Kristalina Georgieva and other economists have warned in recent years about the rising tide of protectionist measures implemented by the advanced economies, including the US and the EU. A recent IMF forecast scenario that involves a trade war between the US, Europe and China would reduce the global and US GDP annual growth forecast by 0.5 percentage points in 2025-30, with smaller effects in the eurozone and China. That scenario did not account for a possible trade war between the US and its immediate neighbors, which also has the potential to disrupt an integrated North American energy market. By David Ivanovich and Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Houthis signal Red Sea attacks pause after Gaza truce


17/01/25
News
17/01/25

Houthis signal Red Sea attacks pause after Gaza truce

Dubai, 17 January (Argus) — The Yemen-based Houthi militant group said it will monitor implementation of a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Gaza-based Hamas, raising the possibility of a reprieve for shipping in the Red Sea, but will remain prepared for military action if the deal is breached. "Our position regarding the situation in Gaza is linked to the position of our brothers in the Palestinian [armed] factions," Houthi leader Abdul-Malik al-Houthi said in a televised speech on 16 January. "We will continue to monitor the stages of implementation of the ceasefire agreement in Gaza, and any Israeli [violation], we will be directly ready to support militarily the Palestinian people." Al-Houthi's remarks suggest a halt in his Iran-backed group's campaign against shipping passing through the mouth of the Red Sea and against Israel directly. But with no clarity if he was referring to attacks on Israel or shipping lanes, shipping firms are likely to remain cautious about returning to the Red Sea. The Houthis began attacking commercial vessels with western and Israeli affiliations in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden following an escalation of fighting between Hamas and Israel. Al-Houthi said his group have carried out 1,255 operations, including using ballistic missiles, drones and gunboats, since November 2023. But the risk of an attack in the Red Sea remains despite the ceasefire between Hamas and Israel, tanker owner Frontline said today. "We [are] all hopeful with the ceasefire, but… any ceasefire will be vulnerable with risk of [a] crew being caught if it breaks," Frontline chief executive Lars Barstad wrote on X. The possibility of an attack has compelled many ship operators to forego the Suez Canal in favor of longer voyages around the Cape of Good Hope in the last year, adding time and cost to movement of commodities. Transit of liquid and dry cargoes through the Suez Canal totaled 343mn t last year, less than half the 763mn t in 2023, according to data from Kpler. The ceasefire deal was announced late on Wednesday, 15 January, by Qatar and the US, two of the three countries that have been helping to mediate the negotiations between Israel and Hamas. Egypt is the third. Israel's security cabinet will meet today to sign off on the deal, and will send it for approval from the full government. By Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia rejects gas exploration permit near Sydney


17/01/25
News
17/01/25

Australia rejects gas exploration permit near Sydney

Sydney, 17 January (Argus) — Australia has refused further permits to two explorers for the controversial petroleum exploration permit 11 (PEP-11) in the offshore Sydney basin, citing public interest and financial stability concerns. The 4,500km² block near the NSW state cities of Sydney and Newcastle contains shale and conventional gas reserves. It was controlled by 85pc stakeholder Asset Energy, 100pc-owned by unlisted oil and gas explorer Advent Energy, and 15pc owner Australia-listed Bounty Oil and Gas. The Commonwealth-New South Wales (NSW) offshore oil joint authority refused the stakeholders' PEP-11 applications on 16 January, federal Labor industry minister Ed Husic said on 17 January. "The joint authority refused the applications for reasons of public interest, concerns about the applicants' estimate of the cost of works and their ability to raise the necessary capital to fund the proposed works," Husic added. The firms were initially refused an extension for PEP-11 in 2021, by then Coalition prime minister Scott Morrison. But Asset appealed this decision , alleging procedural unfairness. Electorates in the northern suburbs of Sydney were considered crucial in Australia's 2022 federal election, which Morrison and his Coalition ultimately lost. Gas exploration and production is politically unpopular in many parts of Australia, despite ongoing concerns about energy shortfalls. Bounty claimed PEP-11 contains potential gas resources of 4.7 trillion ft³ (133bn m³) but the region has not produced any commercial quantities to date. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more