Latest market news

Record carbon prices fail to stifle German coal margins

  • Market: Coal
  • 07/09/21

Record carbon prices in Europe are failing to price coal out of Germany's base-load merit order this winter, as a shortage of natural gas means there is limited scope for utilities to switch to cleaner alternatives at short notice.

The supply of EU emissions trading system (ETS) allowances, natural gas and coal have all tightened in Europe this year, creating a intense positive feedback loop in the power sector.

Rising carbon prices, all things being equal, provide an incentive to burn gas instead of coal for power, but a shortage of gas this year has supported gas prices at levels that fully offset the positive impact of rising carbon prices on gas' competitiveness against coal. This has created upward pressure for power prices, which have increased to cover the rising carbon costs that cannot be mitigated or lessened by coal-to-gas switching, supporting margins for coal-fired power plants this winter and boosting the demand outlook for power-sector coal burn.

The potential for firm and so relatively more carbon-intensive coal-fired power generation this winter is in turn creating additional support for carbon prices, closing the loop of an upward cycle that has characterised European generation fuels markets this year.

Carbon prices

Carbon prices exist to correct a market failure — they allocate a financial cost to a negative externality that was previously unaccounted for — in this case, the environmental cost of emitting CO2 from generating electricity.

But setting a financial cost that is equal to the environmental cost of the externality is difficult. Rather than setting this price directly itself, the EU indirectly sets the price through a cap-and-trade market-based system, with the supply of emissions allowances (EUAs) gradually reduced over time.

This reduction in EUA supply — and the likelihood of further reductions in the future as part of the bloc's "Fit for 55" plan to cut emissions by at least 55pc by 2030 from 1990 levels — has supported carbon prices this year, with allowances exceeding €60/t of CO2 equivalent for the first time at the end of August.

At current prices, the cost of carbon accounts for around €50/MWh, or 51pc of the marginal generation cost of a 42pc efficient coal-fired power plant in Germany. In early 2018, the carbon component was around €27/MWh, or 20pc of the marginal generation cost (see chart).

Wholesale power prices are a function of the generation costs for the marginal power plants needed to meet electricity demand, which are usually coal or gas-fired plants, and so power prices have risen this year in tandem with firming carbon and fuel costs.

This means carbon is increasingly being priced into the wholesale electricity market, going some way towards correcting the market failure that uncosted emissions represent. The previously unaccounted environmental cost of carbon is now being at least partly covered through a financial cost incurred by generators.

While the main goal of carbon prices is to ensure that the negative externality of emissions bears a financial cost, the mechanism can have other consequences that may be desirable or undesirable.

An implicit goal of carbon pricing is to encourage a shift towards cleaner sources of generation, since it is assumed that market participants will act to reduce the negative externality that they are responsible for in order to avoid the financial cost it now incurs.

In this sense, high carbon prices are a signal to accelerate investment in carbon-free generation capacity such as a solar and wind — although this may take some time to bear fruit — and to switch from more carbon-intensive fuels such as coal and lignite to cleaner fuels such as gas. Fuel switching like this could be more immediate if there is already spare gas-fired capacity to use and natural gas supply to consume, as there was in Europe last year.

The existence of a carbon price, and any strength in the carbon market, serves to lift the fuel-switching price for natural gas, which is the theoretical gas price at which generation costs for coal and gas-fired plants of specific efficiencies would be at parity. When the real market price for gas is above or below this level, the fuel is, respectively, uncompetitive or competitive with coal for power generation, based on prevailing coal and carbon prices at the time.

Since coal-fired generation is more carbon-intensive than gas-fired generation, the carbon price always represents a positive component of the fuel-switching price for natural gas. Rising carbon prices lift fuel-switching prices for natural gas and — assuming that gas and coal prices remain unchanged — make gas-fired generation relatively more competitive than coal.

In early 2018, the carbon component of the fuel-switching price of gas for a 55pc efficient gas-fired plant competing with a 42pc coal-fired unit was around €2/MWh, or 12pc of the total. This rose to €8.20/MWh, or 44pc, by the start of this year, and so far this month is €14.90/MWh, or 36pc, of the fuel-switching price (see chart).

Coal prices — the second component of the price for switching to gas — are also trading at more than a decade-high, resulting in an unprecedented fuel-switching price for gas of more than €41/MWh so far this month. But despite such a high fuel-switching price, the actual price of gas is even higher still, at around €51/MWh.

This is because of a shortage of gas in Europe, driven by unusually low inventories and relatively weak pipeline gas and LNG imports, which has significantly reduced availability for the power sector and kept prices supported at a level that makes it uncompetitive with coal.

German gas-fired generation fell by 5.9GW in August from a year earlier to 2.4GW, while coal-fired generation climbed by 690MW to 3.3GW. Coal-fired generation has averaged 7.2GW so far in September.

If rising carbon costs fail to trigger a shift towards less-emissions intensive generation, the carbon cost that is borne by the final consumer will be greater than it otherwise would be. This shows up another potential consequence of carbon pricing, namely that higher carbon costs could, when passed through to the consumer in higher prices, cut overall power demand.

To the extent that this may drive more efficient power demand — consumers insulating their homes for example — the consequence may be considered desirable. But if surging carbon prices make electricity prohibitively expensive for households and businesses and cut demand altogether, their impact may be significantly less palatable, since lower power demand could dent household living standards and economic output more generally.

The current situation marked by supply tightness across the carbon, gas and coal markets is creating a tension between two separate priorities — effectively pricing the environmental cost of unabated carbon emissions and ensuring affordable energy to support the wider economy.

What does this mean for coal?

Surging coal and carbon prices this year have failed to damage implied margins for winter coal-fired generation, which have continued to rise. The fourth-quarter 2021 and first-quarter 2022 clean dark spreads for 42pc efficient coal-fired base-load generation in Germany reached highs of €17.80/MWh and €25.60/MWh, respectively, last week.

The front fourth-quarter clean dark spread has not been higher at any point for at least the past six years (see chart).

The increasing profitability of coal-fired generation this winter suggests that the fuel remains an important backstop in the European power sector that may still be called upon when cleaner alternatives such as gas are not available, no matter what the carbon price.

But forward margins beyond the winter remain under pressure, with summer clean dark spreads for 42pc efficient coal-fired plants negative and spreads for even the highest efficiency coal-fired units negative for calendar 2024 and beyond because of the recent surge in carbon prices. This is a signal to retire existing capacity, meaning less coal-fired power is likely to be available in the future in the event of similar supply crunches, creating the potential for further power price volatility, depending on the speed at which renewable capacity is scaled up.

Some 8.4GW of German coal-fired capacity has already been awarded in phase-out tenders, 4.8GW of which had a 1 July deadline to stop burning coal, with a further 1.5GW to stop from 8 December. Availability is currently scheduled to climb from around 12GW in October to a peak of 14.7GW over November-February this winter.

German daily generation from coal peaked at 13.7GW last winter and averaged 6.6GW over November-February.

4Q 42% clean dark spreads €/MWh

42% efficient coal-fired costs €/MWh

42% coal vs 55% gas coal-switching price €/MWh

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
25/07/24

South Africa adopts climate change law

South Africa adopts climate change law

Cape Town, 25 July (Argus) — South Africa's president Cyril Ramaphosa has signed into law the country's climate change bill, which sets out a national response to climate change for the first time. The new climate change act will enable the orderly reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through the implementation of sectoral emission targets towards South Africa's commitment to reach net zero by 2050. Currently, the country is the 15th largest GHG emitter in the world, according to the World Resources Institute. The law provides policy guidelines to ensure South Africa reaches its nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the Paris climate agreement by assigning individual enterprises carbon budgets and facilitating public disclosure of their progress. In its updated 2021 NDC, the country has undertaken to cut its GHG emissions to 350mn-420mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), equivalent to 19-32pc below 2010 levels, by 2030. The lower end of this range is in line with the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C global warming threshold. To meet this, South Africa will have to achieve a steep decline in coal-fired electricity generation. A carbon tax is seen as a vital component of the country's mitigation strategy, according to the president. "By internalising the cost of carbon emissions, carbon tax incentivises companies to reduce their carbon footprint and invest in cleaner technologies, and also generates revenue for climate initiatives," Ramaphosa said. South Africa's carbon tax was introduced in a phased approach in June 2019 at a rate of 120 rands/t ($7/t) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) and increased to R134/t of CO2e by the end of 2022. But tax-free allowances for energy-intensive sectors such as mining, and iron and steel, along with state-owned utility Eskom's exemption, implied an initial effective carbon tax rate as low as R6-48/t of CO2e. South Africa's National Treasury is targeting an increase to $30/t of CO2e by 2030. But the extension of phase one from the end of 2022 to the end of 2025, together with an uncertain future price trajectory and lack of clarity on future exemptions, means the effective carbon tax rate is likely to remain well below the IMF's recommended $50/t of CO2e by 2030 for emerging markets. The new climate change act seeks to align South Africa's climate change policies and strengthen co-ordination between different departments to ensure the country's transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy is not constrained by any policy contradictions. It outlines South Africa's planned mitigation and adaptation actions aimed at cutting GHG emissions over time, while reducing the risk of job losses and promoting new employment opportunities in the emerging green economy. The law also places a legal obligation on provinces and municipalities to ensure climate change risks and associated vulnerabilities are acted upon, while providing mechanisms for national government to offer additional financial support for these efforts. The new act formally establishes the Presidential Climate Commission (PCC) as a statutory body tasked with providing advice on the country's climate change response. Among other things, the PCC is developing proposals for a just transition financing mechanism, for which a platform will be launched in the next few months. Over the last three years, South Africa has seen an increase in extreme weather events often with disastrous consequences for poor communities and vulnerable groups. To address the substantial gap between available disaster funds and the cost of disaster response, the government announced in February that it would establish a climate change response fund. At the time of the announcement, Ramaphosa reiterated that South Africa would undertake its just energy transition "at a pace, scale and cost that our country can afford and in a manner that ensures energy security". Elaine Mills Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

US-Australia’s Coronado to lift coal sales


25/07/24
News
25/07/24

US-Australia’s Coronado to lift coal sales

Sydney, 25 July (Argus) — US-Australian coal producer Coronado Coal will boost coal sales during July-December despite logistical challenges, as it maintains its output guidance of 16.4mn-17.2mn t for 2024. The firm sold 7.8mn t of coal during January-June, leaving it a target of 8.6mn t for July-December to meet the bottom of its 2024 guidance . It has maintained this guidance despite warning that shipments from its Australian Curragh mine will be affected by a two-week rail disruption from the end of July . Coronado operates the Curragh mine in Queensland and two mining complexes in the US' Virginia. All produce coking and thermal coal. Coronado's revenues were supported during April-June compared with January-March by a smaller discount for pulverised injection coal (PCI) against hard coking coal prices, which saw the PCI price rise while other metallurgical coal prices were under pressure. Its sales prices will remain strong in July-September, forecasts chief executive Douglas Thompson, on restocking in India and the rail disruption in Queensland, as well as the fire at Anglo American's Grosvenor mine that will disrupt Australian exports. Thompson warned that there was some downside risk of $5-10/t to Australian PCI pricing but if this was realised it will see China restart buying from Australia. In the long term he expects more competition from Russia-origin PCI, as Russian coal producers find new routes to the seaborne market and regain market share lost because of an European embargo. The premium for premium hard coal prices over PCI coal prices has shrunk to around $30/t from $145/t over the past six months. Argus last assessed the premium hard low-volatile price at $224/t fob Australia on 24 July and the PCI low-volatile price at $193.65/t. Coronado's group sales volumes were up 8.3pc to 4.1mn t in April-June compared with January-March , reflecting higher sales from its Australian and US operations. The increase in volumes combined with reduced need to remove waste materials allowed Coronado to cut is mining costs by 27.5pc from the previous quarter to an average of $91.10/t of coal sold. The firm expects costs to fall further in July-December as it demobilises more of its mining fleet at its Curragh mine. This reflects reduced waste removal and should have no impact of coal production at Curragh, Thompson said. Production at Curragh should increase in the second half of 2024, with 100,000t of coal production deferred from June to July because of heavy rainfall. By Jo Clarke Coronado Coal (mn t) Apr-Jun '24 Jan-Mar '24 Apr-Jun '23 Jan-Jun '24 Jan-Jun '23 Sales (mn t) Australia (Curragh) 2.7 2.5 2.5 5.2 4.7 US 1.4 1.2 1.5 2.6 3.0 Total 4.1 3.7 4.0 7.8 7.6 Sales data % coking coal of total sales 81.0 78.7 76.0 79.9 75.3 Australian realised met coal price (fob) ($/t) 216.2 225.2 237.7 220.5 239.7 US realised met coal price (for) ($/t) 161.7 170.9 196.0 166.0 215.5 Source: Coronado Australian coal price comparisons ($/t) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australian coal rail line to shut for 2 weeks: Coronado


25/07/24
News
25/07/24

Australian coal rail line to shut for 2 weeks: Coronado

Sydney, 25 July (Argus) — The Blackwater rail line in Queensland, Australia will be closed for up to two weeks because of maintenance, which will restrict coal deliveries to the key port of Gladstone. The maintenance program will run from late July to early August, coal mining firm Coronado said on 25 July. This is limiting metallurgical supply from Queensland and pushing up the price of pulverised coal injection (PCI) coal relative to Australian premium low-volatile coal, it added. The two-week shutdown was planned before Coronado released its 16.4mn-17.2mn t saleable coal guidance for 2024 , which it still expects to reach despite a week-long outage on the Blackwater line in June-July following a collision . Shippers appear prepared for the reduction in shipping from the 102mn t/yr Gladstone port over the next couple of weeks, with just 12 ships queued outside the port on 25 July, down from 23 on 6 June and below-average queues of around 20. Coal is delivered to Gladstone through the 100mn t/yr capacity Blackwater rail line and the 30mn t/yr capacity Moura line, both of which are operated by Australian rail firm Aurizon. Gladstone's shipments fell by 9.5pc in June compared with a year earlier, partly because of rail constraints. Around two-thirds of Gladstone's coal shipments are metallurgical coal and a third are thermal. A fire at UK-South African mining firm Anglo American's Grosvenor mine already hit Australian metallurgical coal exports, which led the firm to cut its 2024 production guidance to 14mn-15.5mn t from 15mn-17mn t. The premium for premium hard coal prices over PCI coal prices has shrunk to around $30/t from $145/t over the past six months. Argus last assessed the premium hard low-vol price at $224/t fob Australia on 24 July, with the PCI low-vol price at $193.65/t. Aurizon and Gladstone Port were contacted for comment, but have yet to respond at the time of writing. By Jo Clarke Australian coal price comparisons ($/t) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US House passes waterways bill


23/07/24
News
23/07/24

US House passes waterways bill

Houston, 23 July (Argus) — The US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a bill on Monday authorizing the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to tackle a dozen port, inland waterway and other water infrastructure projects. The Republican-led House voted 359-13 to pass the Waterways Resources Development Act (WRDA), which authorizes the Corps to proceed with plans to upgrade the Seagirt Loop Channel near Baltimore Harbor in Maryland. The bill also will enable the Corps to move forward with 160 feasibility studies, including a $314mn resiliency study of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which connects ports along the Gulf of Mexico from St Marks, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas. Water project authorization bills typically are passed every two years and generally garner strong bipartisan support because they affect numerous congressional districts. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee unanimously passed its own version of the bill on 22 May. That bill does not include an adjustment to the cost-sharing structure for lock and dam construction and other rehabilitation projects. The Senate's version is expected to reach the floor before 2 August, before lawmakers break for their August recess. The Senate is not scheduled to reconvene until 9 September. If the Senate does not pass an identical version of the bill, lawmakers will have to meet in a conference committee to work out the differences. WRDA is "our legislative commitment to investing in and protecting our communities from flooding and droughts, restoring our environment and ecosystems and keeping our nation's competitiveness by supporting out ports and harbors", representative Grace Napolitano (D-California) said. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US House to vote on waterways bill


22/07/24
News
22/07/24

US House to vote on waterways bill

Houston, 22 July (Argus) — The US House of Representatives is expected to vote on 22 July on a waterways bill that would authorize new infrastructure projects across ports and rivers. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) is renewed typically every two years to authorize projects for the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The bipartisan bill is sponsored by representative Rick Larsen (D-Washington) and committee chairman Sam Graves (R-Missouri). The full committee markup occurred 26 June, where amendments were added, and the bill was passed to the full House . A conference committee will need to be called to resolve the different versions of the bill. The major difference between the bills is that the House bill does not include an adjustment to the cost-sharing structure for the lock and dam construction and other rehabilitation projects. The Senate Committee on Environment Public Works passed its own version of the bill on 22 May, with all members in favor of the bill. The House version of the bill approves modifications to the Seagirt Loop Channel near the Baltimore Harbor in Maryland, along with 11 other projects and 160 feasibility studies. One of these studies is a $314.25mn resiliency study of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which connects ports along the Gulf of Mexico from St Marks, Florida, to Brownsville, Texas. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more