Record carbon prices fail to stifle German coal margins

  • Market: Coal
  • 09/07/21

Record carbon prices in Europe are failing to price coal out of Germany's base-load merit order this winter, as a shortage of natural gas means there is limited scope for utilities to switch to cleaner alternatives at short notice.

The supply of EU emissions trading system (ETS) allowances, natural gas and coal have all tightened in Europe this year, creating a intense positive feedback loop in the power sector.

Rising carbon prices, all things being equal, provide an incentive to burn gas instead of coal for power, but a shortage of gas this year has supported gas prices at levels that fully offset the positive impact of rising carbon prices on gas' competitiveness against coal. This has created upward pressure for power prices, which have increased to cover the rising carbon costs that cannot be mitigated or lessened by coal-to-gas switching, supporting margins for coal-fired power plants this winter and boosting the demand outlook for power-sector coal burn.

The potential for firm and so relatively more carbon-intensive coal-fired power generation this winter is in turn creating additional support for carbon prices, closing the loop of an upward cycle that has characterised European generation fuels markets this year.

Carbon prices

Carbon prices exist to correct a market failure — they allocate a financial cost to a negative externality that was previously unaccounted for — in this case, the environmental cost of emitting CO2 from generating electricity.

But setting a financial cost that is equal to the environmental cost of the externality is difficult. Rather than setting this price directly itself, the EU indirectly sets the price through a cap-and-trade market-based system, with the supply of emissions allowances (EUAs) gradually reduced over time.

This reduction in EUA supply — and the likelihood of further reductions in the future as part of the bloc's "Fit for 55" plan to cut emissions by at least 55pc by 2030 from 1990 levels — has supported carbon prices this year, with allowances exceeding €60/t of CO2 equivalent for the first time at the end of August.

At current prices, the cost of carbon accounts for around €50/MWh, or 51pc of the marginal generation cost of a 42pc efficient coal-fired power plant in Germany. In early 2018, the carbon component was around €27/MWh, or 20pc of the marginal generation cost (see chart).

Wholesale power prices are a function of the generation costs for the marginal power plants needed to meet electricity demand, which are usually coal or gas-fired plants, and so power prices have risen this year in tandem with firming carbon and fuel costs.

This means carbon is increasingly being priced into the wholesale electricity market, going some way towards correcting the market failure that uncosted emissions represent. The previously unaccounted environmental cost of carbon is now being at least partly covered through a financial cost incurred by generators.

While the main goal of carbon prices is to ensure that the negative externality of emissions bears a financial cost, the mechanism can have other consequences that may be desirable or undesirable.

An implicit goal of carbon pricing is to encourage a shift towards cleaner sources of generation, since it is assumed that market participants will act to reduce the negative externality that they are responsible for in order to avoid the financial cost it now incurs.

In this sense, high carbon prices are a signal to accelerate investment in carbon-free generation capacity such as a solar and wind — although this may take some time to bear fruit — and to switch from more carbon-intensive fuels such as coal and lignite to cleaner fuels such as gas. Fuel switching like this could be more immediate if there is already spare gas-fired capacity to use and natural gas supply to consume, as there was in Europe last year.

The existence of a carbon price, and any strength in the carbon market, serves to lift the fuel-switching price for natural gas, which is the theoretical gas price at which generation costs for coal and gas-fired plants of specific efficiencies would be at parity. When the real market price for gas is above or below this level, the fuel is, respectively, uncompetitive or competitive with coal for power generation, based on prevailing coal and carbon prices at the time.

Since coal-fired generation is more carbon-intensive than gas-fired generation, the carbon price always represents a positive component of the fuel-switching price for natural gas. Rising carbon prices lift fuel-switching prices for natural gas and — assuming that gas and coal prices remain unchanged — make gas-fired generation relatively more competitive than coal.

In early 2018, the carbon component of the fuel-switching price of gas for a 55pc efficient gas-fired plant competing with a 42pc coal-fired unit was around €2/MWh, or 12pc of the total. This rose to €8.20/MWh, or 44pc, by the start of this year, and so far this month is €14.90/MWh, or 36pc, of the fuel-switching price (see chart).

Coal prices — the second component of the price for switching to gas — are also trading at more than a decade-high, resulting in an unprecedented fuel-switching price for gas of more than €41/MWh so far this month. But despite such a high fuel-switching price, the actual price of gas is even higher still, at around €51/MWh.

This is because of a shortage of gas in Europe, driven by unusually low inventories and relatively weak pipeline gas and LNG imports, which has significantly reduced availability for the power sector and kept prices supported at a level that makes it uncompetitive with coal.

German gas-fired generation fell by 5.9GW in August from a year earlier to 2.4GW, while coal-fired generation climbed by 690MW to 3.3GW. Coal-fired generation has averaged 7.2GW so far in September.

If rising carbon costs fail to trigger a shift towards less-emissions intensive generation, the carbon cost that is borne by the final consumer will be greater than it otherwise would be. This shows up another potential consequence of carbon pricing, namely that higher carbon costs could, when passed through to the consumer in higher prices, cut overall power demand.

To the extent that this may drive more efficient power demand — consumers insulating their homes for example — the consequence may be considered desirable. But if surging carbon prices make electricity prohibitively expensive for households and businesses and cut demand altogether, their impact may be significantly less palatable, since lower power demand could dent household living standards and economic output more generally.

The current situation marked by supply tightness across the carbon, gas and coal markets is creating a tension between two separate priorities — effectively pricing the environmental cost of unabated carbon emissions and ensuring affordable energy to support the wider economy.

What does this mean for coal?

Surging coal and carbon prices this year have failed to damage implied margins for winter coal-fired generation, which have continued to rise. The fourth-quarter 2021 and first-quarter 2022 clean dark spreads for 42pc efficient coal-fired base-load generation in Germany reached highs of €17.80/MWh and €25.60/MWh, respectively, last week.

The front fourth-quarter clean dark spread has not been higher at any point for at least the past six years (see chart).

The increasing profitability of coal-fired generation this winter suggests that the fuel remains an important backstop in the European power sector that may still be called upon when cleaner alternatives such as gas are not available, no matter what the carbon price.

But forward margins beyond the winter remain under pressure, with summer clean dark spreads for 42pc efficient coal-fired plants negative and spreads for even the highest efficiency coal-fired units negative for calendar 2024 and beyond because of the recent surge in carbon prices. This is a signal to retire existing capacity, meaning less coal-fired power is likely to be available in the future in the event of similar supply crunches, creating the potential for further power price volatility, depending on the speed at which renewable capacity is scaled up.

Some 8.4GW of German coal-fired capacity has already been awarded in phase-out tenders, 4.8GW of which had a 1 July deadline to stop burning coal, with a further 1.5GW to stop from 8 December. Availability is currently scheduled to climb from around 12GW in October to a peak of 14.7GW over November-February this winter.

German daily generation from coal peaked at 13.7GW last winter and averaged 6.6GW over November-February.

4Q 42% clean dark spreads €/MWh

42% efficient coal-fired costs €/MWh

42% coal vs 55% gas coal-switching price €/MWh

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
02/21/24

Japan sees potential for increased summer power demand

Japan sees potential for increased summer power demand

Tokyo, 21 February (Argus) — Reduced nuclear availability and firm electricity demand in Japan is lifting the potential for increased consumption of thermal power generation fuels this summer. The Japan Meteorological Agency forecasts a 50-70pc probability of temperatures during June-August 2024 rising above the 30-year average in all parts of Japan. Average temperatures in Japan's major cities, such as Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya, during June-August 2023 were higher than the long-term average. This implies that the country is likely to face similar summer temperatures as last year. Nuclear power output is projected to fall and boost the country's thermal power demand during summer. The operating capacity of nuclear power plants could fall to an average of 7,562MW during June-August from average actual operating capacity of 9,563MW in the same period in 2023, according to Argus calculations based on data from Japan's Agency for Natural Resources and Energy and notices on the Japan Electric Power Exchange website. Hotter weather across the country in 2023 failed to lift thermal fuel demand, with power demand in Japan's 10 service areas averaging 104.3GW for June-August, down by 1.2pc from the same period a year earlier, according to nationwide transmission system operator the Organisation for Cross-regional Co-ordination of Transmission Operators. The rainy season normally boosts electricity demand but sunlight hours were unusually longer in 2023 compared with 2022 that capped power use in June and July, as it boosted solar power generation to 4,645GWh in from 4,320GWh in the same period in 2022. Continued energy saving efforts also helped to cut electricity use. Japan's LNG consumption for power generation totalled 9.8mn t during June-August 2023, according to the trade and industry ministry. Coal use totalled 26.5mn t, while oil consumption — including fuel oil, diesel and crude — was 57,651 b/d. LPG use was 6,014t. By Nanami Oki and Reina Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read More
News

More rainfall cuts Coronado's Australian coal outlook


02/20/24
News
02/20/24

More rainfall cuts Coronado's Australian coal outlook

Sydney, 20 February (Argus) — US-Australian coal producer Coronado Coal is factoring in new Australian wet weather patterns in its unambitious saleable coal guidance of 16.4mn-17.2mn t for 2024. Wetter than expected weather in Queensland in 2023 and port delays contributed to Coronado selling 15.8mn t of coal in 2023 , missing its revised guidance of 16.2mn-16.4mn t . Coronado is investing to expand metallurgical coal sales from Australia and the US, yet the 2024 guidance compares with the original 2023 target of 16.8mn-17.2mn t set in February 2023 . This is partly to allow growth plans to push production across Australia and the US to 20.5mn t/yr over the next couple of years. But it also reflects the firm allowing for extra disruption from heavy rainfall at its Curragh operation in Queensland, rather than using a straight 10-year average, as has been standard. After a very wet 2020-22, associated with the La Nina weather pattern, 2023 was meant to be a drier year dominated by an El Nino trend that usually brings drier than average weather to the east coast of Australia. But the coal mining regions in Queensland have had a wet 2023, with particularly heavy rainfall from November 2023 into 2024. This is forcing mining firms to reconsider their production and sales expectations from mines in Queensland. Australian coking coal exports for 2023 were 151.28mn t , which is the least shipped since 2012, down from 160.53mn t in 2022 and a peak of 186.83mn t in 2016, according to Australian Bureau of Statistics data supplied by GTT. This was despite firmer prices in 2023, particularly for high-grade metallurgical coal sold from Queensland, that should have driven producers to increase supplies. Demand for Australian coking coal will continue to grow driven by India but supplies remain constrained, according to Coronado chief financial officer Gerhard Ziems. Coronado reported a profit of $156.1mn in 2023, down from $771.7mn in 2022, but maintained a modest dividend payout as it looks to deploy capital to grow its capacity to supply the metallurgical coal business. It has internal growth plans, including expanding the Curragh metallurgical and thermal coal mine in Queensland to 13.5mn t/yr in 2025 and its US coal mines to 7mn t in 2025. The Argus premium hard coking coal price averaged $295.86/t in 2023, down from $365.60/t in 2022 but up from $223.16/t in 2021 and $124.26/t in 2020. By Jo Clarke Australian metallurgical coal prices ($/t) Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

JETP needs to be scaled up to be effective: Report


02/16/24
News
02/16/24

JETP needs to be scaled up to be effective: Report

Singapore, 16 February (Argus) — The Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) — intended to help emerging economies' energy transition efforts — need to be scaled up to achieve their full potential, according to a research report. The JETPs have been "long on promise, but so far short on implementation," according to the Scaling the JETP model report by US research firm the Rockefeller Foundation and US-based environmental advocacy group the Environmental Defense Fund. The JETP is a financing mechanism led by the International Partners Group (IPG) — formed from various donor countries — and the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, a coalition of major financial institutions. The first three JETP deals in South Africa, Indonesia and Vietnam were based on enabling a just transition from coal to clean power, while the latest deal in Senegal focused on accelerating access to clean energy through deploying renewables. But the deals only cover a small portion of total investment needed to achieve net zero power sector emissions, and there has not been enough "new and additional" concessionary capital after the initial "fanfare" when partnerships are announced. There has been insufficient access to technical, planning and modelling capacities within countries, and also a lack of clarity regarding the roles of involved multilateral development banks (MDBs). The report suggests four pathways to address and overcome barriers to scale, as well as allow the model to reach its full potential. The first is the development of nationally-owned "country platforms", which are institutional venues that would allow for more structured dialogue between government officials, technical partners and financers. Such a platform would be able to oversee the development of a "nationally appropriate investment plan," states the report. There are countries that have expressed interest in support packages but currently have no access to them, such as Kenya, Thailand, Mexico and Kazakhstan, according to the report. The second pathway suggests that these countries could come together and announce their interest in such JETP-like deals. This would send a signal to potential support partners and illustrate that there is enough demand to require a reformation of the international financial system, and the countries could collectively set out more "coherent and credible investment plans," states the report. The third pathway sees more involvement from MDBs, especially if the aforementioned country platforms are successful, as the leadership of these banks will be necessary. The MDBs bring "relevant capabilities in technical sectoral expertise, country-led engagement, government relationship management, [and the] ability to navigate diverse financing partners." The MDBs could help to co-ordinate between providers of capital and help to design investment plans. Lastly, the IPG needs to expand and increase the donor pool so that there is more concessionary capital, the lack of which is the biggest constraint that deals are currently facing. JETP packages would also be more successful if consolidated offers were made by the group, instead of each IPG member making a discrete offer. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australian coal plant blast cause 'complex': CS Energy


02/14/24
News
02/14/24

Australian coal plant blast cause 'complex': CS Energy

Sydney, 14 February (Argus) — An explosion at the 1,586MW Callide coal-fired power plant in Australia's Queensland state in May 2021 was the result of the simultaneous failure of key electrical equipment and system back-ups in a "complex series of events that could not have been anticipated", Queensland state-controlled utility CS Energy said. A technical report on the causes of the incident released on 13 February has determined that the trigger was a collapse of voltage in the direct current (DC) system of the 420MW Callide C4 unit, just as a new battery charger was being connected to the facility. The unit turbine tripped because of the loss of supplies but remained connected to the grid. The turbine generator continued to spin with the loss of critical systems, directly leading to its explosion, CS Energy said. The blast led to blackouts in large parts of the state , including some of its largest coal ports, and boosted gas-fired generation and electricity prices over the 2021 winter. The report is based on CS Energy's assessment of the incident including contribution from third-party experts such as consultancy Aurecon and independent investigator Sean Brady, who is yet to complete a final assessment, the utility said. CS Energy said it has modified the design of the Callide C plant, which also comprises the 466MW C3 unit, as the original design did not enable two batteries being connected to the same DC supply system. This will ensure a battery is always connected, backing critical protection circuits, the utility said. It has also made several other modifications to prevent a similar event from happening again. The utility operates the Callide C joint venture on behalf of IG Power, formerly known as InterGen Australia. The C4 unit is scheduled to return partially on 30 June 2024, pushed back from previous schedules , while the C3 unit is expected to reconnect to the grid partially on 29 February, reaching full capacity on 31 March. The C3 unit went back on line already in winter 2021 but suffered a structural failure of the cooling plant in October 2022 . CS Energy also operates and fully owns the 700MW Callide B plant, which is currently operational. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia’s Loy Yang A coal-fired plant back on line


02/14/24
News
02/14/24

Australia’s Loy Yang A coal-fired plant back on line

Sydney, 14 February (Argus) — Australian utility AGL Energy's 2,210MW Loy Yang A brown coal-fired power station is resuming operations after it tripped on 13 February, as wild storms lashed Victoria state and about half a million customers lost power. Loy Yang A's No.2 and No.3 generation units are now on line, with the remaining two units to be progressively returned to service during the next 24 hours, AGL said on 14 February. Approximately 220,000 homes and businesses are still without power in Victoria because of damage to power lines, down from a peak of 530,000 , the Australian Energy Market Operator said. The outage was the first major loss of network transmission capacity during the 2023-24 Australian summer, which has been cooler and wetter than expected, reducing the risk of power shortfalls predicted last year. AGL reported an A$399mn ($258mn) profit for July-December 2023, up from the A$87mn recorded for the same period a year earlier. The firm increased its commitment to renewable power and storage projects by 500MW to up to 5.8GW ahead of planned coal-fired power plant closures and under pressure from shareholders to transition away from fossil fuels. AGL, Australia's largest greenhouse gas emitter, is pushing ahead with plans to decarbonise its operations under pressure from key shareholder climate activist and technology billionaire Mike Cannon-Brookes. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.