Global oil firms look to build Indian strategic reserve

Market: Condensate, Crude oil
04/08/23

Several major global oil and commodity trading firms have expressed interest in building India's new Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), the government told the lower house of parliament on 3 August.

BP, Shell, Chinese state-controlled PetroChina, trading firms Trafigura and Vitol, Glencore and others indicated interest in building the 6.5mn t (47.6mn bl) phase two of India's SPR project during two roadshows held by the Indian government, minister of state for petroleum and natural gas Rameswar Teli told the Lok Sabha on 3 August.

Teli did not provide details of the roadshows, but the government had launched roadshows in October 2018 to attract investors, according to a press release.

Delhi had in 2021 given approval for a 4mn t facility in Chandikhol in Odisha state and a 2.5mn t reserve in Padur in Karnataka, as part of phase two of the reserves, to be constructed under public-private partnership. The country already has three storage facilities from the first phase with a combined capacity of 5.33mn t. The completion of phase two will take India's total SPR capacity to 11.83mn t.

The country imported 4.67mn b/d of crude during the April 2022-March 2023 fiscal year, according to data from the oil ministry, so a storage capacity of 11.83mn t is equivalent to over 18 days of cover.

The holder of the concession must transfer the SPR, along with single mooring point, onshore and offshore pipeline, to the government at the end of 60 years of concession period, an official press release said. But it did not provide further details.

The government also said it has the right to take first crude from the SPR in case of shortages. The country withdrew 5mn bl of crude oil from its strategic reserve in 2021 to supply state-controlled refiners as part of globally co-ordinated action against sharp increases in crude oil prices.

The Indian government has earmarked 50bn rupees ($604mn) in its budget for the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year to rebuild the country's SPR. The amount set aside by the government for the refilling of India's SPR is multiple times the cumulative allocations made in previous budgets, and is more than twice the combined investment of about Rs19bn made by India in the past decade.

The government set up the Indian Strategic Petroleum Reserve (ISPRL) in 2005 to maintain India's strategic reserves of crude oil, and liberalised its oil policy in 2021, under which the ISPRL was allowed to commercialise 50pc of its reserves, of which 20pc could be used for trading and the remaining for leasing out capacity.

By Pranav Joshi

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News

20/05/25

Shell CEO defends 'resilient investment strategy'

London, 20 May (Argus) — Shell chief executive Wael Sawan defended the company's "resilient investment strategy" at its annual shareholder meeting today, as directors faced a barrage of questions from climate-focused investors. A resolution calling for more details on Shell's LNG strategy gained over 20pc support, a level consistent with climate-related votes in previous years . But absent this year were the disruptive climate protests that have marked past meetings. This was partly due to Shell's choice of venue, London's Heathrow Airport, which has a five-year High Court injunction banning environmental protests on site. Still, climate-conscious shareholders dominated the discussion. One questioned how Shell could justify expanding oil and gas operations when the IEA's net zero emissions by 2050 scenario suggests no new oil and gas projects are needed. Shell's chairman Andrew Mackenzie responded that the IEA's scenario is just one of many and includes conditional commitments made by governments that may not materialise. "We see a phase of continuing growth, particularly in the use of gas and especially in LNG, that we think is appropriate to invest in," he said. Sawan pointed out that most of the net present value from Shell's oil and gas projects will be realised before 2040, "and so this is a very resilient investment strategy that we are offering our shareholders". He also highlighted that Shell has $20bn of capital invested in low-carbon alternatives such as biofuels, hydrogen and electric vehicle charging. "It is in our interest... to see that market grow," he said. A key focus was Resolution 22, filed by the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR), which called on Shell to explain how its LNG strategy aligns with its climate goals. "We believe that shareholders still don't have the information that they need to properly assess the risks associated with this strategy," said the ACCR's Sarah Brewin. The scale of Shell's uncontracted LNG out to 2050 exposes the company and its shareholders to "significant risk should prices fall and demand soften", she said. The company's LNG outlook "is highly optimistic and increasingly out of step with global trends", she added. Shell's board opposed the resolution, arguing that its strategy is based on a range of scenarios — including one exploring the impact of AI on energy demand. Its 2025 LNG Outlook, based on Wood Mackenzie data, forecasts a 60pc rise in global LNG demand by 2040, driven by economic growth in Asia and decarbonisation in heavy industry and transport. While the resolution did not pass, Shell said it will prepare a note within six months detailing its LNG market outlook, its LNG business strategy and how these align with its climate commitments. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more

News

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks

20/05/25

News

20/05/25

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks

Rio de Janeiro, 20 May (Argus) — Brazil is arguing that its developing country status allows it to consolidate its position as a major crude producer and is likely to lean on developed countries during much-awaited discussions on moving away from fossil fuels at the UN Cop 30 climate conference in November. Attempts to reach an ambitious outcome on mitigation — cutting greenhouse gas emissions — and actions to move away from fossil fuels were quashed at Cop 29 in Baku last year, and all eyes are on Brazil to bridge divides on this issue . Cop 30 president-designate Andre Correa do Lago has failed to address fossil fuels in his two letters outlining priorities for the summit, but members of the Cop 30 team have indicated the issue will be on the agenda. With geopolitical tensions and energy security questions redirecting government priorities away from the energy transition, the outlook is more challenging than when Cop parties agreed the global stocktake (GST) conclusion on fossil fuels and energy in 2023 . But Brazil is well-placed to take the lead. It is a respected player in climate discussions and has one of the cleanest energy mix — 49pc of its energy and 89pc of its electricity comes from renewables. Its own mitigation efforts prioritize slashing deforestation, which accounts for the lion's share of Brazil's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Non-profit World Resources Institute Brazil describes the emissions reduction target in Brazil's nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — as "reasonable to insufficient" and notes that energy emissions are expected to increase by 20pc in the decade to 2034. Its NDC avoids any concrete steps towards winding down crude. After you The government's view on fossil fuels is that Brazil's developing country status, the oil and gas industry's importance in its economy and comparatively low fossil fuel emissions justify pushing ahead with oil production. Correa do Lago said earlier that Belem was picked as a venue for Cop 30 to show that Brazil is still a developing country, adding that any decision on oil and gas should be taken by Brazil's citizens. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that oil revenue will fund the energy transition. It is a position that has earned Brazil accusations of hypocrisy from environmentalists at home and abroad, but which also places it as a possible model for other hydrocarbon-producer developing countries. Brazil's diplomatic tradition of pragmatically balancing seemingly opposing positions could serve it well here, said Gabriel Brasil, a senior analyst focused on climate at Control Risks, a consultancy. He does not see Brazil's attempt to balance climate leadership with continued oil production as hurting its standing among fellow parties or energy investors. Civil society stakeholders hope pre-Cop meetings will help bring clarity on how Brazil might broach the fossil fuel debate. Indigenous groups, which are set to be given more space at Cop, are demanding an end to fossil fuel extraction in the environmentally sensitive Foz do Amazonas offshore basin. Meanwhile, Brazilian state-owned Petrobras moved one step closer to being authorized to begin offshore drilling there . During meetings of the UN climate body — the UNFCCC — in Panama City this week, the Cop 30 presidency will present ideas for the summit "with a focus on the full implementation of the GST". But it has to wait for countries to update their NDCs to gauge what is achievable on mitigation. Only 20 have submitted new NDCs so far, with the deadline pushed back to September. Brazil's own NDC gives some clues. It welcomes the launch "of international work for the definition of schedules for transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems" and reiterates that developed countries should take the lead. And a report commissioned by Brazil's oil chamber IBP and civil society organization ICS to be given to negotiators ranks Brazil as a "mover" in the transition away from oil and gas, ahead of "adapters" like India and Nigeria but behind "front-runners" Germany and the US. The research develops the idea of a country-based transition plan, using criteria such as energy security and institutional and social resilience, as well as oil and gas relevance. By Constance Malleret 2023 Brazil emissions sources Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Libyan crude returns to Asia after one-month hiatus

20/05/25

News

20/05/25

Libyan crude returns to Asia after one-month hiatus

London, 20 May (Argus) — Libyan crude is once again heading to Asia-Pacific after exports to the region came to a complete halt in April — the first such pause since August 2020, according to Argus tracking data. The Suezmax Sea Sapphire departed Libya's Zueitina port on 15 May with around 1mn bl of light sweet crude bound for Thailand's Ko Sichang terminal, where it is expected to arrive on 26 June, according to Vortexa and Kpler. It marks the first Libyan crude cargo to load for Asia-Pacific since March, and flows to the region averaged 76,000 b/d in the first three months of this year. Despite favourable arbitrage conditions in April — the Brent-Dubai EFS more than halved on the month to 30¢/bl in March when April-loading cargoes were trading — no Libyan crude was loaded for the region last month. Buyers in Asia-Pacific appear to have opted for light sour Caspian CPC Blend instead. Shipments of the Caspian grade to Asia-Pacific hit a two-year high of 541,000 b/d in April, supported by weaker price differentials. But with eastbound arbitrage shipments now less workable, most May and June-loading CPC Blend supplies are heading to Europe, according to traders. This may have prompted Asia-Pacific refiners to turn back to Libyan grades. Thailand has been a regular buyer of Libyan crude, taking 16 cargoes in 2022 and nine in 2023, according to Argus tracking data. The Sea Sapphire is already the third Libyan cargo to load this year, matching the total for the whole of 2024. A second Suezmax cargo of Libyan crude is scheduled to depart Marsa al-Hariga on 27 May and arrive at China's Ningbo port on 24 June, although the fixture remains unconfirmed. Despite renewed interest from Asia-Pacific, Libya's overall crude exports are scheduled to fall by 9pc on the month in May to 1.13mn b/d across its 12 grades, according to provisional loading programmes. By Ellanee Kruck Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US budget bill not enough of permitting fix: CEO

19/05/25

News

19/05/25

US budget bill not enough of permitting fix: CEO

Washington, 19 May (Argus) — Republican efforts to unilaterally overhaul federal pipeline permitting through a filibuster-proof budget bill will not provide the certainty needed to make major investments in new energy infrastructure, an industry executive said today. Republicans in the US House of Representatives will vote as early as this week on a bill that would offer fast-tracked approval of new pipelines and immunity from some lawsuits, in exchange for a fee of up to $10mn. But that bill, along with attempts by the White House to expedite project approvals by executive order, fall short of what industry officials would like to see on permitting, US midstream operator Howard Energy Partners chief executive Mike Howard said. "Permit reform through an executive order or a reconciliation bill, that doesn't give me the confidence to go spend billions of dollars on new infrastructure," Howard said at a conference held by the news publisher RealClear. "You have to have an act of Congress that both sides of the aisle agree to and make real laws." Energy industry officials have good reason to be skeptical that permitting provisions in the budget bill will remain intact over the years it can take to plan, permit and build large-scale energy infrastructure. Wind and solar developers, oil companies and others making investments based on the clean energy tax credits that Democrats passed through the Inflation Reduction Act now face a risk those credits will be gutted by the Republican budget bill . A bipartisan permitting deal would probably be far harder to negotiate if Republicans succeed in using the pending budget bill to dismantle the clean energy spending in the Inflation Reduction Act, given that any agreement would need to fast-track pipelines in exchange for faster approval of electric transmission lines needed for renewables. Pipeline officials say they are continuing to push for permitting legislation, along with other fixes to expedite projects. "We spend more money on our permitting process than we spend on the steel in modern pipeline projects today, so we are a lot more focused now on the regulatory process and really getting streamlined because we think there's a tremendous amount of value in getting that resolved," US gas infrastructure company Williams chief executive Alan Armstrong said today in an interview on CNBC. Last week, US gas producer EQT's chief executive Toby Rice said there needs to be "significant reform" on permitting to offer the industry the confidence needed to start investing again in new pipelines, after a series of major projects were blocked over the last five years. "We're going to have to have more conversations with the pipeline guys," Rice said at an event held by the US Energy Association. "We've had executives that have lost billions of dollars proposing pipelines and having them blocked, canceled or opposed." By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US House panel votes down Republican megabill

16/05/25

News

16/05/25

US House panel votes down Republican megabill

Washington, 16 May (Argus) — A key committee in the US House of Representatives voted today to reject a massive budget bill backed by President Donald Trump, as far-right conservatives demanded deeper cuts to clean energy tax credits and social spending programs. The House Budget Committee failed to pass the budget reconciliation bill in a 16-21 vote, with four House Freedom Caucus members — Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), Chip Roy (R-Texas), Josh Brecheen (R-Oklahoma) and Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia) — voting no alongside Democrats. A fifth Republican voted no for procedural reasons. The failed vote will force Republicans to consider major changes to the bill before it comes up for a vote on the House floor as early as next week. Republican holdouts say the bill would fall short of their party's promises to cut the deficit, particularly because it would front-load increased spending and back-load cuts. The bill is set to add $3.3 trillion to the deficit, or $5.2 trillion if temporary provisions were permanent, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Some critics of the bill said the proposed cut of $560bn in clean energy tax credits is not enough, because the bill would retain some tax credits for new wind and solar projects. "A lot of these credits have been in existence for 30 or 40 years, and you talk about giveaways, we want to help those who really need help," Norman said ahead of his no vote. "That's the heart of this. Sadly, I'm a no until we get this ironed out." Negotiations will fall to House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), who can only lose three votes when the bill comes up for a vote by the full House. But stripping away more of the energy tax credits enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act could end up costing Johnson votes among moderates. More than a dozen Republicans on 14 May asked to pare back newly proposed restrictions on the remaining clean energy tax credits. Ahead of the failed vote, Trump had pushed Republicans to support what he calls the "Big Beautiful Bill". In a social media post, he said "Republicans MUST UNITE" in support of the bill and said the party did not need "GRANDSTANDERS". The failed vote has parallels to the struggles that Democrats had in 2021 before the implosion of their push to pass their sprawling "Build Back Better" bill, which was later revived as the Inflation Reduction Act. Republicans say they will work over the weekend on a compromise. The House Budget Committee has scheduled another hearing at 10pm on 18 May to attempt to vote again on the budget package, but any changes to the measure would occur later, through an amendment released before the bill comes up for a vote on the House floor. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more