Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

TotalEnergies rows back on Uganda oil project timeline

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 17/04/24

The head of TotalEnergies' Ugandan operations said the company may miss its long-standing target to start crude production from the country's 230,000 b/d Lake Albert project by the end of next year.

"I want to answer this question that everyone is asking, will first oil flow in 2025? I am not sure end of 2025 will be the timeline," TotalEnergies' general manager in Uganda Philippe Groueix told an oil and gas conference in Kampala today.

The timing will depend on the agility of stakeholders to co-operate to resolve outstanding issues, Groueix said.

The Lake Albert project has been controversial since its inception. It involves building the world's longest heated crude export pipeline to connect the TotalEnergies-operated 190,000 b/d Tilenga and Chinese CNOOC-operated 40,000 b/d Kingfisher oil fields in Uganda's Lake Albert basin to the port of Tanga on Tanzania's Indian Ocean coast.

The project partners have faced a barrage of legal challenges in the last few years from environmental groups and non-governmental organisations who claim the pipeline poses a risk to the environment and the livelihoods of local populations. Meanwhile, international banks have come under pressure to distance themselves from the project and in 2022, the European Parliament passed a resolution calling on TotalEnergies to delay work on the pipeline by a year in order to study the feasibility of an alternative route.

Despite the above-ground challenges, TotalEnergies, CNOOC and the Ugandan government have stuck rigidly to a 2025 start-up. More recently, TotalEnergies tweaked its estimate to the "end of 2025", with chief executive Patrick Pouyanne telling investors in February that the project would be around 60pc complete by the end of this year. Groueix's comments today mark the first time the company has flagged a potential delay, although he did not offer a new timeline.

"First oil will depend on our agility to work together, although we are all aiming to produce as soon as possible," Groueix said, adding that four rigs are drilling at the oil fields, three at Tilenga and the other at Kingfisher.

"It is Uganda's right to exploit her natural resources and we shall produce this oil in the most responsible way possible to decarbonize," he said. "Our projects will not flare gas, but we shall produce LPG from this gas and this will reduce the use of charcoal and firewood by a big percentage, thereby saving trees and improving climate. So the activists should know that we are part of the agenda to promote the environment."

Uganda's energy minister Ruth Nankabirwa gave a sanguine response to news of a possible delay, comparing Uganda's oil and gas projects to a woman in labour. "The child can come before the set timeline or shortly after, but the signs are showing that the child is kicking," she said.

Nankabirwa said she will head to Beijing early next month to meet Chinese president Xi Jinping to discuss financing for the $5bn crude pipeline. Chinese export credit agency Sinosure is in talks to provide up to $3bn for the pipeline and is due to make a decision on this in June.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
13/06/25

Israel strikes Iran, US claims non-involvement: Update

Israel strikes Iran, US claims non-involvement: Update

Washington, 12 June (Argus) — Israel carried out air and missile strikes against Iran in the early hours of Friday local time, setting the stage for a major escalation in the world's largest oil producing region. Israel said it struck military targets and infrastructure associated with Iran's nuclear programme across the country. It claimed the attack was carried out in self-defense, as "Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon." Iranian state media reported a first wave of strikes over the capital city, Tehran, at around 03:20 local time (23:50 GMT). Images and videos published by the state broadcaster showed residential towers that had been struck in the attack, causing numerous casualties. There were reports soon after of fire and smoke at the general command headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) in the east of the capital, and strikes elsewhere in the country, among them key sites like the Shahid Ahmadi Roshan nuclear site in Natanz, around 200km south of the capital. Iran's civil aviation authority announced within two hours of the initial strikes that all flights had been grounded at all of the country's airports, and that the airspace over Iran will be closed "until further notice." Following the strikes on the IRGC headquarters, Iranian state media was quick to dismiss reports suggesting casualties among the country's top military officers. But news has emerged on the death of key individuals, including the IRGC's commander-in-chief Hossein Salami and Iran's army chief, Mohammad Bagheri. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Israel should "expect a severe punishment" in the face of the early morning strikes which "struck residential centers." "Several commanders and scientists were martyred in the enemy's attacks," Khamenei said. "Their successors and colleagues will immediately resume their duties… with this crime, [Israel] has prepared a bitter and painful fate for itself, which it will definitely see." Iran's foreign ministry said that Iran "has the legal and legitimate right to respond" to the Israeli attacks "in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter," and called on the president of the UN Security Council "to take immediate action" to confront Israel's aggression "as soon as possible." Article 51 states that "nothing in the present charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a member of the UN, until the security council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security." 'Not involved' The US said it was not involved in the Israeli strikes and advised Tehran not to retaliate against US personnel in the Middle East. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," secretary of state Marco Rubio said, adding that the Trump administration has "taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners." Iran's defense minister Aziz Nasirzadeh just this week warned that Iran could and would target US bases in the region if conflict was "imposed on us." The US administration appeared to have at least advance warning of the imminent attack and on Wednesday ordered non-essential US personnel in Iraq and Israel to evacuate immediately. Less than a day before the Israeli attack, Trump told reporters at the White House that he advised Israel against striking Iran as it may jeopardize his diplomacy with Tehran. US and Iranian diplomats were scheduled to meet on Sunday for another round of talks on a new deal to curb Tehran's nuclear program. As long as the US and Iran are negotiating, "I don't want [Israel] going in because, I mean, that would blow it," Trump said. "Might help it actually but it also could blow it." Crude oil futures surged in early Asian trading following news of the attacks. The front-month August Ice Brent contract rose by as much as 13pc to a high of $78.50/bl in early trading. July WTI futures on Nymex traded as high as $77.62/bl. By Haik Gugarats and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Israel strikes Iran, US claims non-involvement


13/06/25
News
13/06/25

Israel strikes Iran, US claims non-involvement

Washington, 12 June (Argus) — Israel carried out air and missile strikes against Iran in the early hours of Friday local time, setting the stage for a major escalation in the world's largest oil producing region. Israel said it struck military targets and infrastructure associated with Iran's nuclear program across the country. It claimed the attack was carried out in self-defense, as "Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon." The US said it was not involved in the Israeli strikes and advised Tehran not to retaliate against US personnel in the Middle East. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," secretary of state Marco Rubio said, adding that the Trump administration has "taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners." The US administration appeared to have at least advance warning of the imminent attack and on Wednesday ordered non-essential US personnel in Iraq and Israel to evacuate immediately. Less than a day before the Israeli attack, Trump told reporters at the White House that he advised Israel against striking Iran as it may jeopardize his diplomacy with Tehran. US and Iranian diplomats were scheduled to meet on Sunday for another round of talks on a new deal to curb Tehran's nuclear program. As long as the US and Iran are negotiating, "I don't want [Israel] going in because, I mean, that would blow it," Trump said. "Might help it actually but it also could blow it." Iran's state news agency Irna reported explosions in and near Tehran. WTI Nymex futures were up 8pc to $73.14/bl as of 9:30pm ET on Thursday, in after-hours trading. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Trump discusses possible Israel attack on Iran


12/06/25
News
12/06/25

Trump discusses possible Israel attack on Iran

Washington, 12 June (Argus) — US president Donald Trump today suggested that Israel is preparing a military strike against Iran, but added that he opposed such action as it could jeopardize his diplomatic efforts with Tehran. An Israeli attack on Iran may not be imminent "... but it looks like it's something that could very well happen," Trump told reporters today. Casual discussion of military conflict that would destabilize the Middle East is the latest twist in Trump's outreach to Tehran to strike a nuclear agreement outwardly very similar to one he terminated in 2018. The Trump administration in the past two days ordered non-essential US civilian and military personnel to evacuate from Iraq and Israel. The US in the past temporarily drew down its diplomatic presence in Iraq — most recently in early 2024 — in response to risks posed by pro-Iran militias based in Iraq. Israel and Iran exchanged missile and drone strikes in 2024. As long as the US and Iran are negotiating, "I don't want [Israel] going in because, I mean, that would blow it," Trump said. "Might help it actually but it also could blow it." US and Iranian negotiators are scheduled to meet on Sunday for another round of talks on the future of Tehran's nuclear program and possible relief of US sanctions. The key outstanding issue separating Washington and Tehran is Iran's ability to enrich uranium and, thus, retain a theoretical path to nuclear weapons. "Look, it's very simple, not complicated," Trump said today. "Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful." A "pretty good" nuclear deal with Iran is within reach but "it's got to be better than pretty good though", Trump said today. As Trump's administration claimed progress in talks with Iran, US lawmakers critical of Iran, as well as Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have stepped up demands for a complete elimination of Tehran's nuclear program. Tehran insists it must retain the civilian component of its nuclear program. UN nuclear watchdog the IAEA declared Iran non-compliant with its non-proliferation obligations, a decision denounced by Tehran. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

UK ETS emissions fell by 11pc on the year in 2024


12/06/25
News
12/06/25

UK ETS emissions fell by 11pc on the year in 2024

Seville, 12 June (Argus) — Emissions in sectors covered by the UK emissions trading scheme (ETS) declined by 11.5pc year on year in 2024, data published by the UK ETS authority show, slowing their decline slightly from the previous year. Stationary installations covered by the UK ETS emitted 76.7mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), down by 12.9pc from 2023, the data show. But this was offset somewhat by a 2pc increase in aviation emissions to 8.99mn t CO2e. Overall UK ETS emissions now have declined for two consecutive years, having fallen by 12.5pc in 2023. Emissions under the scheme rose by 2.5pc in 2022, as a strong rebound in aviation activity following earlier Covid-19 restrictions outweighed declining stationary emissions. Stationary emissions have decreased in every year since the scheme launched in 2021. The majority of the decline in stationary emissions under the UK ETS last year took place in the power sector, where emissions dropped by 18.2pc to 30.6mn t CO2e. The country's last coal-fired plant, Ratcliffe-on-Soar, closed in September last year. And the share of gas-fired output in the generation mix dipped as wind, solar and biomass production and electricity imports edged higher. Industrial emissions also declined, by 8.9pc to 46.1mn t CO2e. The iron and steel sector posted the largest relative drop of 30pc to 6.54mn t CO2e. Emissions from crude extraction fell by 6.4pc to 6.0mn t CO2e, while emissions from gas extraction, manufacture and distribution activities decreased by 8.9pc to 5.3mn t CO2e. The chemicals sector emitted 2.28mn t CO2e, down by 5.2pc on the year. A total of 43 installations were marked as having surrendered fewer carbon allowances than their cumulative emissions since the launch of the UK ETS, as of 1 May. A further two installations failed to report their emissions by the deadline. "Appropriate enforcement action" will be taken against operators that fail to surrender the required allowances, the UK ETS authority said. Overall greenhouse gas emissions across the UK economy dropped by a smaller 4pc last year, data published by the government in March show. This decline also was driven principally by lower gas and coal use in the power and industry sectors, with smaller declines in transport and agriculture, not covered by the UK ETS, and an increase in buildings emissions, also out of the scheme's scope. Emissions under the EU ETS in 2024 dipped by a projected 4.5pc from a year earlier, based on preliminary data published by the European Commission in April. The UK and EU last month announced that they will "work towards" linking the two systems together. By Victoria Hatherick UK ETS emissions mn t CO2e Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Malaysia’s oil, gas projects to emit 4bn t GHG: CREA


12/06/25
News
12/06/25

Malaysia’s oil, gas projects to emit 4bn t GHG: CREA

Singapore, 12 June (Argus) — Malaysia's continued extraction and use of its oil and gas resources could emit around 4bn t of greenhouse gases (GHGs), according to a report by the Helsinki-based Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). Malaysia holds about 9.84bn bl of oil equivalent (boe) in committed fossil fuel reserves, of which 82pc is gas, stated the report, which was written in collaboration with environmental think-tank RimbaWatch. This figure only includes projects with proven reserves that are covered by a production commitment such as production sharing contracts. These committed reserves would also emit an estimated 4.15bn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), which is equivalent to 13 years of Malaysia's annual emissions. The emissions will also consist of 10.9mn t of methane, which is a much more potent GHG than CO2. Malaysia's remaining commercially recoverable reserves are estimated at over 17bn boe over more than 400 fields, with gas comprising about 75pc of this. Malaysia launched its national energy transition roadmap (NETR) in 2023, detailing initiatives to achieve its 2050 net zero carbon emissions target, such as renewable energy development, hydrogen and carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS). The country aims to reduce its economy-wide carbon emissions by 45pc in 2030 compared with 2005 levels, under its nationally determined contribution — climate plan — to meet the goal of the Paris Agreement. But at the same time, the country is seeking to maximise its fossil fuel production to ensure energy security. State-owned Petronas raised its total oil and gas production in 2024 to 2.4mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d), up by 1pc on the year. Of this, oil production fell by 4.4pc on the year to 813,000 boe/d, while gas output rose by 3.6pc to 1.64mn boe/d. More than 80pc of Malaysia's power was generated from fossil fuels in 2024. The NETR plans to increase the share of gas in total primary energy supply by 16pc from 2023 to 57pc in 2050, with gas viewed as a transition fuel for decarbonisation. But "referring to gas as sustainable, and claiming that Malaysia can achieve net-zero emissions through growing gas, are oxymorons," stated the report. Petronas' Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions totalled 46.04mn t of CO2e across its Malaysian operations in 2024, surpassing its target of 49.5mn t of CO2e for the year. In comparison, the firm recorded 45.6mn t of Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions in 2023. But the firm's net zero pathway excludes its Scope 3 emissions, which make up about 80pc of a fossil fuel entity's emissions, according to the report. Additionally, its CCUS plans are aimed at enabling sour gas extraction, hence exacerbating fossil fuel production and emissions. Malaysia should instead set a sectoral carbon budget for the domestic energy sector in line with its net zero goals, taking into account both production and consumption, and cement this budget in the country's upcoming Climate Change bill, stated the report. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more