Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Q&A: Clarity on regulations is key: PETCORE's Ciotti

  • Market: Petrochemicals
  • 24/01/25

After a solid but slightly underwhelming second half of 2024, this year brings a range of possibilities for the European rPET market. For the first time, there is an obligation for EU member states to reach a 25pc recycled content threshold for PET beverage bottles placed on their market, which should support demand. But cheap virgin PET prices increase the incentive for non-compliance, and European recyclers have called for more clarity over issues including how targets will be enforced and how imported recyclates and chemically recycled material will be allowed to count towards them, to stimulate investment. Argus spoke to PETCORE Europe president Antonello Ciotti this week to understand his views on these topics and the outlook for 2025.

What are your expectations for PET recycling in 2025, and how recyclers can deal with challenges such as rising fixed costs and energy prices, as well as cheap virgin prices, in the current market environment?

Unfortunately, my expectations are not high. We face two basic challenges. Firstly, we face a structural issue because collection costs in Europe are far higher than outside Europe — some 10 times higher compared with countries such as Egypt, Morocco and China. European recyclers cannot close this gap simply by higher technical standards and innovation — they need protection to compete on a level playing field.

Secondly, we are grappling with a lack of clarity. The EU institutions are not clear on what will happen if players don't add at least 25pc recycled content to PET beverage bottles that they sell into the EU market [in line with the country-by-country targets laid out since 1 January in the EU Single Use Plastic (SUP) directive]. There does not appear to be any penalty for those who do not comply with the rules, so naturally the incentive to comply is not high.

As the cost of rPET is higher than vPET, we need to fight any potential greenwashing as hard as we can, to ensure brands that are paying the prices to comply are not at a cost disadvantage and thus losing market share, margin and profitability.

How much of an impact do you expect imports to have on the European rPET market in the coming years, taking into account expectations for how the push for stricter certification on imports will develop?

The current situation is clear — imported rPET is cheaper than European rPET. Stricter certification will certainly have an impact in the medium term, but it's not here yet. The current situation is that European rPET manufacturers face extra costs compared with imports, which cannot be compensated. Some brands could look to address the recycled content requirements set out by the SUP directive by seeking to buy lots of recyclates from outside Europe. In the future, with proper certification implemented, this could change the landscape significantly.

How much is the uncertainty and potential inconsistency in enforcement of the recycled content regulations in the SUP directive likely to affect its impact on rPET demand in 2025?

For the time being, uncertainty will affect the directive's impact a great deal. It is not clear what counts as recycled content and if depolymerisation is included. The EU Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety was requesting that recycled content should include only PET from European collections, but so far there is a lack of clarity on whether to interpret the definition of "placed on the market" as the EU market or the global market, which is adding to the confusion.*

The SUP directive, passed in 2019, is not clear enough and to confuse matters further, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) passed in 2024 is not aligned with the SUP. The SUP is a directive, so it is for EU member states, and they must transpose it into their own laws by January 2025 and implement it. The PPWR is a regulation, aimed at companies that must reach specific targets by 2030.

However, with the current market situation of rPET being more costly than virgin PET, companies are understandably hesitant to increase the recycled content to or above 25pc as the target is a country average. It only really makes sense for the large brands that are driven by customer demand. Consumers are keen to see recycled content in packaging, but of course they do not expect to pay more for their products as a result. There is currently a clear disconnect between the wishes of the consumer and the realities of the industry.

Several European PET depolymerisation projects have faced challenges in recent months. How quickly do you expect to see commercial-scale depolymerisation making a meaningful contribution to PET recycling in Europe?

I don't see depolymerisation making a meaningful contribution until we get greater clarity over regulation. This is something that we will be taking up urgently with the European Commission, including with the commission speakers at our annual PETCORE Europe conference in Brussels on 4-5 February.

Clearly the technology needs to be proven and to be cost-effective. But even if this was the case, companies may have cancelled and postponed projects due to legislative uncertainty. They cannot be expected to move ahead with huge investments if it is not clear whether the definition of what is accountable in recycled content has been clarified. The endless discussion on the mass balance technology is a typical example of what we need to clarify.†

PETCORE Europe continues to push the commission to clarify all the cloudy points that are still pending, to allow correct implementation of the SUP directive. This is the thrust of the discussions that will be taking place at our conference.

The environment in which we operate is changing and Europe's PET industry has realised that it has lost its former global competitiveness. The challenge, and our role as the association representing the complete PET value chain in Europe, is to work to set in place conditions needed for the industry to regain its position and its competitive advantage by innovation and investments in new technologies.

*The most recent EU implementing decision relating to the SUP directive defines post-consumer plastic waste as generated from waste "placed on the market" without further clarification. A draft update in February 2024 expanded on the definition to "generated from plastic products that have been supplied for distribution, consumption or use on the market of a Member State or of a third country in the course of a commercial activity", but this was not adopted at the time.

†The as-yet-unadopted February 2024 implementing decision laid down a "fuel-use exempt" methodology for calculating chemically recycled content in respect of the SUP directive targets. This led to an objection from the European Parliament's environment committee, although this was rejected in a vote by the parliament. Discussions are ongoing with a new draft implementing decision due early this year.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
11/02/25

Trump bans federal use of paper drinking straws

Trump bans federal use of paper drinking straws

Houston, 11 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump has signed an executive order to ban the procurement of paper drinking straws by the US government and to take steps toward enacting a similar ban nationwide. An "irrational" campaign against plastic straws had forced Americans to use "nonfunctional" paper straws that are more expensive and may pose a risk to human health, Trump said in the order signed Monday. Health risks include the leaching of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from paper straws into drinks, the White House said. The order signed on Monday bans the purchase of paper straws for use in federal buildings and requires within 45 days the development of a " National Strategy to End the Use of Paper Straws". Former president Joe Biden had directed the federal government to end the use of single-use plastic in food applications by 2027. The Plastics Industry Association praised the executive order. "Plastic is the best material for nearly everything it is used for, while being sustainable," Plastics Industry Association chief executive Matt Seaholm said. "Straws are just the beginning — 'Back to Plastic' is a movement we should all get behind." Plastic straws are typically made from polypropylene. Environmental group Greenpeace USA accused Trump of signing the order as a distraction from his administration's moves to prevent federal institutions from protecting Americans from microplastics and "dangerous chemicals". By Zach Kluver Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

LyondellBasell mulls Dutch PO/SM plant reorganisation


11/02/25
News
11/02/25

LyondellBasell mulls Dutch PO/SM plant reorganisation

London, 11 February (Argus) — Chemicals firm LyondellBasell is in negotiations with workers at its Maasvlakte propylene oxide (PO) and styrene monomer (SM) production facility in the Netherlands about "a reorganisation at the plant", Dutch workers' union FNV told Argus . The union is negotiating with the company on compensation for workers whose jobs may be affected and assistance with transitioning to new roles. Members will vote on the proposed plan by the end of February. "At this stage, no definitive decisions have been made," LyondellBassell said today. The firm "continuously evaluates business conditions, our portfolio and a wide range of options for managing our assets," it said. The Maasvlakte PO/SM plant is a 50-50 joint venture between LyondellBasell and Germany's Covestro. "Covestro regularly reviews its portfolio in the light of business conditions. This includes discussions with our joint venture partner regarding the Maasvlakte site," Covestro said. LyondellBasell and Covestro both declined to comment on whether they are discussing a possible sale of the Maasvlakte facility. LyondellBasell launched a strategic review of its European assets last May. The review is ongoing, the firm said last month. The Maasvlakte plant is one of six ‘non-core' European assets, the company said in August last year. The facility has 315,000 t/yr of PO capacity and 640,000 t/yr of SM capacity. It began operations in 2003 and employs approximately 160 people. The plant has been idled since December last year 2024. It has been intermittently idled several times in recent years, reflecting a structural surplus in Europe's PO and SM production capacity. The negotiations with workers indicate LyondellBasell is considering longer-term changes to operations at the site. Europe's petrochemicals sector remains squeezed by high energy costs, a higher overall cost base compared to other production regions and stagnant regional downstream demand. LyondellBassell also has 220,000 t/yr of PO and tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) production capacity in France and 260,000 t/yr of PO and TBA capacity in the Netherlands. It also has a total of 649,000 t/yr of PO and SM capacity in the US that it operates jointly with Covestro, as well as over 1mn t/yr of its own PO and TBA capacity in the US including a 470,000 t/yr plant in Channelview, Texas, which started up in early 2023 . Production margins for PO/TBA facilities, which supply TBA for MTBE production, are generally much more favourable than for PO/SM plants. And lower US energy costs help to make US PO output more cost-efficient than in European production. US exports of PO to Europe have increased sharply since 2023, reaching 7,800 t/month in 2024, according to US customs data, up from just 760 t/month in 2020 (see graph). By Laura Tovey-Fall US PO exports '000 t Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

BP puts Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany up for sale


06/02/25
News
06/02/25

BP puts Gelsenkirchen refinery in Germany up for sale

Hamburg, 6 February (Argus) — BP said today it will begin seeking buyers for its Ruhr Oel business, which includes the 257,800 b/d Gelsenkirchen refinery and an associated petrochemicals plant in western Germany. The UK company hopes to reach a sales agreement in 2025, although the exact timing will depend on approval of local competition authorities, it said. The sale should have no affect on short-term supply of oil products in western Germany as the refinery will keep up normal production in the interim, the company said in a press release. BP had said it planned to downsize Gelsenkirchen , shutting four unitsand reducing its crude capacity by a third. The shutdown of the affected units is scheduled for the end of the 2025 and will go ahead, BP told Argus . Potential buyers are not yet known. BP is the latest in a series of companies looking to sell or reduce their refinery shares in Germany. Shell is still searching for a buyer for its 37.5pc stake in the PCK consortium's 226,000 b/d Schwedt refinery, in eastern Germany, after a sale to UK energy firm Prax fell through in late December. Shell was also in discussions to sell its 32.25pc stake in the Miro's consortium's 310,000 b/d Karlsruhe refinery to czech company MERO CR in 2024, which did not result in a sales agreement. Shell is further on track to shut down the Wesseling plant at its 334,000 b/d Rhineland refinery complex. Russian state-controlled Rosneft intends to sell its German subsidiaries, Rosneft Deutschland and RN Refining & Marketing, which are held under the trusteeship of the Federal Network Agency. These assets include a controlling stake in the PCK joint venture, a 24pc share in the Miro's consortium and a 28.6pc share in the Bayernoil joint venture, operator of the 207,000 b/d Neustadt-Vohburg refinery in Bavaria. ExxonMobil announced its intention to sell its 25pc stake in the Karlsruhe refinery to Austria's Alcmene, a subsidiary of Estonia's Liwathon, in 2023. The sale fell through in July 2024 after a German court upheld a ruling banning the company from selling its stakes in the Miro consortium following an injunction filed by Shell. BP also operates the 95,000 b/d Lingen refinery in western Germany. This is unaffected by the sale plan for Gelsenkirchen. By Natalie Müller Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US Mexico-Canada tariffs to disrupt polymers markets


31/01/25
News
31/01/25

US Mexico-Canada tariffs to disrupt polymers markets

Houston, 31 January (Argus) — Planned US tariffs on Canadian and Mexican imports will disrupt years of free flowing polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) trade between the three countries, market sources say, which could lead to higher prices and less spot market trading. US President Donald Trump repeated on Thursday plans to impose 25pc tariffs on all Canadian and Mexican imports as soon as 1 February. The US and Canadian petrochemical markets in particular operate like one market, with buyers purchasing resin from producers on both sides of the border. Canadian producers are embedded in US buyers' supply strategies, but if Canadian resin is suddenly 25pc more expensive, buyers may need to reconsider other alternatives within the US. Canadian producers may feel obliged to swallow the costs to keep market share, while others may back away from spot trading in the US market, where margins for generic prime, offgrade and widespec material are already lower. "It's about to get pretty crazy," said one US polymer distributor, active in both the US and Canada markets. Canadian producer footprint significant There is approximately 4.6mn t/yr of PE capacity in Canada operated by three major producers, Nova Chemicals, Dow and ExxonMobil, representing around 16.3pc of total US/Canada capacity. Dow is in the planning stage of a $6.5mn net zero CO2 emissions project planned in Alberta, Canada, that will include an additional 2mn t/yr of PE capacity. Heartland Polymers, the only PP producer in Canada, has 525,000 t/yr of PP capacity, representing approximately 4.9pc of total US/Canada PP capacity. Canadian producers are still figuring out how to respond, not wanting to lose market share to US competitors. In a 23 January statement to customers, Nova Chemicals attempted to reassure its US customers. "We understand the importance of remaining competitively priced to retain your business," the communication said. "As stated previously, Nova chemicals is the importer of record, and will be responsible for paying the tariff." Buyers have taken that statement to mean that Nova will not pass the cost of the tariff on to US customers, but other market participants said that is less clear. A Nova spokesman said only that "US customers will not need to manage the customs process associated with their order from Nova" but did not comment on whether the cost would be passed along to buyers. A spokesman from Heartland Polymers declined to comment, saying they do not comment on "political matters." Dow and ExxonMobil did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Sources said the tariffs could fundamentally shift the way the markets operate. "Tariffs will change the way they do business," said one buyer active in both the US and Canadian markets, speaking of Canadian PE and PP producers. One trader said it believes that even if Canadian producers remain competitive for contract business, they are unlikely to participate in the spot market in the US, which typically has lower margins. "If they don't have to sell it in the US, they won't do it," the trader said. Canadian customers could also feel the impact if Canada responds with its own tariffs, sources said. "Canadian customers might feel out of harms way, but if the US tariffs them, they will tariff the US," said one PP distributor. "I think both sides are going to be looking for a solution." Mexico flow largely one-way The situation in Mexico is slightly different, with most resin flowing one way — from the US into Mexico — where local production is not enough to meet Mexican demand. Sources there said the big impact will come when or if Mexico responds with retaliatory tariffs on US resin. "A tariff is going to be like a gunshot in the leg for the Mexican economy," said one Mexican polymer producer. The initial concern for most customers in the three countries is existing contracts with resin producers, but later there will be concerns about demand, with the potential for manufacturing to shift back to the US from Canada and Mexico. "Some people are thinking some production may come back to the US with tariffs, so you could see a slight demand boost," said one US-based PE distributor. For now, Canadian producers are believed to have shipped large quantities of resin over the border to the US in recent weeks, believing that if it is already across the border it is not subject to any new tariff. Sources said they are hopeful those volumes will buy them some time until the governments in both countries can come to an agreement. By Michelle Klump Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US PVC producers weigh cutbacks on lower margins


30/01/25
News
30/01/25

US PVC producers weigh cutbacks on lower margins

Houston, 30 January (Argus) — US polyvinyl chloride (PVC) producers are weighing operation cutbacks in February after grappling with deteriorating sales margins underpinned by elevated feedstock costs and stagnant end-product values. PVC producer profitability eroded in January as prices for key feedstock ethylene leapt to four-month highs by mid-January, various sources said. Ethylene is a main component in ethylene dichloride (EDC) manufacturing, which is then cracked into vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) before being converted into PVC. Some domestic PVC production is fully integrated and feature ethylene crackers, but many producers still purchase spot or contract ethylene and remain exposed to price fluctuations in the spot market. Spot US ethylene prices to-date in January have averaged 18pc higher than in December and 66pc higher than in January 2024, according to Argus data. Meanwhile, PVC spot values in Houston appreciated at a much slower rate between December and January, climbing by 1pc. Elevated ethylene spot prices are expected to persist in the near-term, maintaining pressure on PVC margins, due to planned maintenance and recovery from unplanned shutdowns in mid-January stemming from sub-freezing temperatures that gripped the US Gulf coast. The expectation for ethylene values to persist at current levels is anticipated to result in PVC production cutbacks, according to several exporters. Some producers, though, remain incentivized to maintain operating rates after bringing online expanded capacity last year. Formosa and Shintech collectively brought more than 500,000 metric tonne (t)/year of new PVC capacity on line during the second half of 2024. The ramp up in added capacity coincided with increasing trade barriers into key offshore destinations, which is expected to keep more volumes within the US while consumer demand outlooks this year remain cautiously optimistic . US buyers are unsure if domestic demand will be strong enough in 2025 to absorb additional volume, placing a ceiling on upward price direction. Exporters are even less optimistic operating in a global market increasingly defined by anti-dumping duties and plentiful Chinese supply. Domestic contract negotiations have highlighted the contrast between higher operating costs and a well-supplied PVC market. Producers cited higher operating costs to argue against lower contract negotiations in January, especially after prices fell in October and November. Several producers announced increases for February volumes, with some rising as high as 5¢/lb. But buyers said current demand does not support increases and instead view price hikes as to recapture lost margin. While producers sought price stability for January monthly contracts, they are also competing to lock in volume commitments through 2025 with aggressive annual contract discussions. Producers are trying to establish a price floor domestically by limiting price erosion among already-low-priced customers, but the additional capacity has made steeper price concessions difficult to avoid in other instances. One evolving upstream market variable is a firmer US Gulf coast spot export caustic soda market, which could encourage producers to maintain current rates and delay any cuts. Integrated PVC producers also manufacture chlorine and caustic soda through chlor-alkali units. Caustic soda is a co-product of chlorine — the latter a key feedstock in EDC production — and price swings in chlorine or caustic soda values can influence production decisions for PVC manufacturers. Caustic soda export prices from the US Gulf coast this week rose by $10/dry metric tonne (dmt) from the prior week and remains 8pc higher than the same week last year, according to Argus data. Tightened spot supply availability is a tailwind for spot values in the near-term, but values remain 24pc lower than peak levels in September when caustic soda prices last offset tighter PVC margins. By Aaron May and Connor Hyde Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more