Viewpoint: Opec cuts, new ships to weigh on VLCC market

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 12/28/18

Mideast Gulf very large crude carrier (VLCC) freight rates are likely to retreat in 2019, as Opec production cuts and sustained high delivery levels of new-build tankers erode recent strength.

Rates on the key eastbound routes have been particularly strong in the fourth quarter. The Mideast Gulf-east Asia VLCC assessment averaged $14.71/t, compared with just $8.76/t over the same period in 2017. The rate averaged $15.45/t in November, the most for any month since December 2015, and the December average is on pace to be $15.26/t.

Rates benefited from the US' reimposition of sanctions on Iran, which encouraged Asia-Pacific refiners to source alternatives from other Mideast Gulf nations. That in turn caused regional producers — particularly, but not only, Saudi Arabia — to raise production. This all fuelled demand for tankers to load spot cargoes in the Mideast Gulf.

But sensitivity to gasoline prices tempered the US' desire to reduce Iranian exports to zero, and Washington granted eight countries six-month waivers on purchases of Iranian crude.

The additional demand for VLCCs is likely to fade in January, with a knock-on effect on freight rates. Opec and its non-Opec allies have agreed to cut production by a combined 1.2mn b/d in the first six months of 2019, from an October baseline, with the bulk of those cuts concentrated in the Mideast Gulf and especially in Saudi Arabia.

Opec and its partners will meet again in April to determine strategy for the second half of next year, so the longer term outlook for tanker demand is unclear.

Nor is it clear if and to what extent all eight countries will exercise their waivers — although it is likely that some will not. How much Iranian crude China and India will continue to take after the end of the six months remains is also an unknown.

India has already put in place insurance and banking mechanisms — such as recognising Iranian insurers and paying in rupees — to maintain Iranian crude imports and the use of Iranian tankers. Aside from serving India and China, the sizeable Iranian tanker fleet — at 42 VLCCs the second largest state-owned VLCC fleet in the world — is unlikely to resume voyages to other countries any time soon.

Following official US guidance, marine liability insurance providers have advised countries with waivers to employ only Iranian ships, or to use domestically-registered ships with government-backed insurance. Concerns about the potential for breaching US secondary sanctions on insurance provision might dissuade some importers from exercising their waiver rights.

Burgeoning US Gulf crude exports helped buoy VLCC freight rates this past year, and these flows are likely to grow in 2019 as export infrastructure expands. A typical voyage from the Mideast Gulf to north China takes around 21 days and the journey from the US Gulf can take more than 50 days, so the impact on tonne-mile demand for tankers is significant. While there is still a risk of renewed tariff tension between the US and China, that would not bar US crude from other markets in east Asia.

Crude from the US will more than offset falling production and exports from two other key Atlantic basin exporters Angola and Venezuela. Exports from the former are still a significant influence on VLCC freight rates, since much of it goes to China and a journey from Cabinda to Qingdao occupies a tanker for almost 34 days.

Scheduled Angolan loadings in January will match August's multi-year low of 1.33mn b/d.

By contrast, much Venezuelan crude makes short voyages to the US Gulf — longer-distance shipments are typically to cover debt. Nigerian crude exports are more of a factor for the Suezmax tanker sector.

On the supply side of the VLCC market, the tonnage glut is likely to persist after years of rapid new-build deliveries and a full order book for 2019. Around 10 VLCCs are still due for delivery in 2018, most of which now look destined to roll over into 2019. That will add to the just under 70 new-build VLCCs scheduled to hit the water next year, enough to accommodate 134mn bl of crude.

The net gain will be lower, because of scrapping. The pace of demolitions quickened in 2018, but there will be muted scrapping rates in early 2019 as owner earnings improved greatly in the fourth quarter.

Around 25 VLCCs are aged 20 years or more and are likely scrapping candidates, with perhaps another 14 to reach that milestone in 2019. That means strong net fleet growth is still likely in 2019, maintaining the supply-side pressure on freight rates.

The pace of scrapping could accelerate in the longer term as, by some estimates, around 20pc of the VLCC fleet could be 15 years or more in 2019.

The approach of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) 2020 sulphur limits might constrain VLCC tonnage in 2019. Exhaust scrubber uptake is higher among VLCCs than among other classes of tanker because of relative installation costs and potential bunker fuel cost savings. So more VLCCs could making dry dock visits later in 2019 for retrofitting, temporarily removing some tonnage from the market.

Retrofitting may take place on up to 100 VLCCs, most likely before the end of 2019 or in early 2020. There is unlikely to be sufficient dry dock capacity for shipowners to make significant new orders ahead of the IMO sulphur limit coming into force.

Demand to use VLCCs as floating storage has been very limited in recent years, but could again be a significant factor affecting tonnage availability. Aside from NITC vessels, VLCC floating storage demand remains highly dependent upon whether the crude forward curve is sufficiently in contango.

The Bab el-Mandeb strait remains a source of risk while the conflict in Yemen drags on. Any disruption to tanker traffic through that or any other chokepoint, particularly the straits of Hormuz, could have a significant and rapid effect on VLCC freight rates.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/06/24

ExxonMobil files for arbitration over Guyana: Update

ExxonMobil files for arbitration over Guyana: Update

Adds Chevron response. New York, 6 March (Argus) — ExxonMobil has filed for international arbitrators to resolve a disagreement over a stake in offshore Guyana oil production rights, a move that could derail Chevron's $53bn takeover of US producer Hess. The dispute revolves around Hess' 30pc stake in the giant offshore Guyana Stabroek block, which is a prime driver behind Chevron's proposed acquisition of the US independent producer. Chevron maintains that ExxonMobil's pre-emption provision does not apply here because of the structure of its merger with Hess and the language in the contract. "We fully intend on ensuring that we preserve those pre-emption rights," ExxonMobil's senior vice president Neil Chapman said at Morgan Stanley's Energy & Power Conference in New York today. The arbitration case will be heard at the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris. The process could take 5-6 months, according to Chapman. Terms of the joint operating agreement in question, which was co-authored by ExxonMobil, were based on an industry standard, Chapman said. A number of observers said it was a surprise the issue was not clarified before Chevron made its bid for Hess. "Most observers in this industry would understand our reputation for rigor, attention to detail in contract language," Chapman said. "What that means is we're extremely confident in our position that preemption rights exist in this contract." In response today, Chevron said it remains "fully committed to the transaction, and are confident in our position." The Chevron-Hess transaction was an attempt to "circumvent" the agreement when ExxonMobil had taken "tremendous" exploration and financial risks in Guyana in the early days, Chapman said. "We as a participant, have the rights to match a reasonable allocation of the value of the Hess transaction associated with their position in the Stabroek block," Chapman said. If the Chevron-Hess deal does not go ahead, Chapman hinted at the possibility that ExxonMobil could end up acquiring the stake at some point in the future. "If that transaction does not proceed, there is potential value down the road for ExxonMobil," he said. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

US SEC adopts weaker climate disclosure rule


03/06/24
News
03/06/24

US SEC adopts weaker climate disclosure rule

Washington, 6 March (Argus) — Far fewer companies will be required to begin disclosing climate-related information under a rule the US Securities and Exchange (SEC) finalized today, in a retreat from more ambitious climate reporting requirements proposed in 2022. Publicly traded companies will still have to disclose to investors if they have "material" climate-related risks, under the final rule adopted today, in addition to whether they have processes to manage those risks. But in a major change from the proposal, the SEC will only require companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions data if they would be material to investors, with no reporting at all of "scope 3" emissions that arise from a company's supply chain. The rollback of the rule marks a victory for oil companies, manufacturers and business groups that said the proposed rule — which the agency initially estimated could cost more than $6bn/yr — was too burdensome and was unlikely to offer useful information to investors. Critics were particularly opposed to SEC's initial push for some disclosure of scope 3 emissions, which they said would create a dragnet forcing companies to collect emissions data across their supply chains, even from private and small companies that might consider that data confidential. The final rule also aligns closer with the status quo. Many large companies, including major oil companies, already voluntarily disclose their direct "scope 1" and "scope 2" greenhouse gas emissions to their investors through annual reports, in addition to other information related to any material climate-related risks they face. But SEC chairman Gary Gensler said the rule, approved in a 3-2 vote, will offer investors more "consistent, comparable and decision-useful information" on a company's greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks. Investors will end up having far more useful information as a result of the rule, he said, replacing an existing voluntary structure under which companies decided on their own what climate information to tell investors. Despite the rule's rollbacks, state-level Republicans are preparing to challenge the rule in court, based partly on complaints that the SEC has veered away from its investor protection mandate and instead is trying to set climate policy. West Virginia attorney general Patrick Morrisey, who plans to file a lawsuit on behalf of at least nine states later today in the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, said one problem with the rule is it would be "virtually impossible" for companies to decide if their emissions are material to investors. Environmentalists also said they are considering filing a lawsuit challenging the removal of the stringent sectons of the rule, while also defending the SEC's authority to require climate disclosures for publicly traded companies. The SEC's two Republican commissioners voted in opposition. The rule marks the culmination of activist attempts to "hijack" securities laws to further climate-related goals, commissioner Mark Uyeda said. The disclosure mandate will result in a "flood of climate-related" data that will "overwhelm" investors but not necessarily offer useful information, SEC commissioner Hester Peirce said. 'Bare minimum' Environmentalists say the disclosure requirement could be useful but would be far more effective if it was finalized as proposed, concerns echoed by Gensler's fellow Democratic commissioners. The final rule is the "bare minimum" for climate-related disclosure and was "better for investors than no rule at all," SEC commissioner Caroline Crenshaw said in explaining her decision to support the new climate rule. Under the rule, companies with at least $700mn in outstanding shares will have to disclose material climate-related risks in fiscal year 2025. Those companies will also have to begin disclosing material "scope 1" and "scope 2" greenhouse gas emissions — which come from direct operations and buying electricity — in fiscal year 2026, but with reporting deferred until their second quarterly report to offer time to gather data. The climate risk disclosures will take effect a year later for companies with at least $75mn of outstanding shares, and those companies do not have to begin disclosing material greenhouse gas data until fiscal year 2028. Any smaller publicly held companies will have to report climate-related risks in fiscal year 2027, with no disclosures required at all of greenhouse gas data. The SEC had initially proposed requiring greenhouse gas reporting for all public companies, with no materiality requirement. The SEC retained requirements for companies to report more information if they have plans to reach climate-related targets and goals. If a company is using carbon offsets or renewable energy credits as a "material component" of its climate goals, it will have to start disclosing any relevant costs and losses. In another part of the rule, the SEC will require companies to disclose in financial statements any costs, charges and losses in excess of a 1pc threshold that arise as a result of severe weather, droughts, wildfires, sea-level rise or other natural conditions. The rule's importance has somewhat diminished in the years since the SEC first proposed the mandate. California last year enacted a law to require public and private companies with business in the state and at least $1bn/yr in revenue to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions, including scope 3 emissions, starting as soon as 2026. The SEC rule will not preempt state disclosures, agency staff said. The SEC initially aimed to finalize the rule by the end of 2022. But the agency repeatedly delayed that timeline amid a shifting legal environment, including the US Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in a separate climate lawsuit that embraced the "major questions doctrine" that raised doubts over novel regulatory initiatives. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Houthi strike kills mariners on bulk carrier


03/06/24
News
03/06/24

Houthi strike kills mariners on bulk carrier

Washington, 6 March (Argus) — A direct attack on a bulk carrier in the Gulf of Aden today killed members of the ship's crew, marking the first fatalities from attacks on commercial shipping by Yemen's Houthi militants. The bulk carrier True Confidence suffered a hit and the crew abandoned the ship following the attack, the UK Maritime Trade Organization said. Ships describing themselves as the "Yemeni Navy," a designation used by the Houthi militant group's naval arm, approached the True Confidence , which was moving toward the Red Sea, and forced the bulk carrier to alter course, UK maritime security firm Ambrey said. A Houthi spokesperson said that the bulk carrier was targeted because it was a US-owned vessel. The True Confidence is Barbados-flagged and Liberia-owned, the White House said. "It was not a US ship, contrary to what the Houthis claimed," it said. The US State Department said the fatalities were the first among commercial ship crews since since Houthis started to attack ships transiting near Yemen in November. "That was, sadly, inevitable," the State Department said. "The Houthis have continued to launch the reckless attacks with no regard for the well being of innocent civilians who are transiting through the Red Sea. And now, they have, unfortunately and tragically, killed innocent civilians." The attacks by the Houthi militants have prompted many vessel operators to take the longer and more expensive route around the Cape of Good Hope, driving up freight rates. No LNG carriers have transited the Suez Canal this month either, following attacks on shipping by the Houthis in recent months. The US strategy of conducting air strikes against targets in Yemen, patrolling the Red Sea and trying to choke off supply of Iranian materiel to the Houthis has so far not succeeded in stopping the attacks. A senior US defense official told a Senate panel last week that the Pentagon has no definite end in sight for its campaign of air and missiles strikes against Houthi militants in Yemen, implying that the threat to Red Sea shipping lanes could remain acute for months to come. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Second WTI cargo heading for Nigeria's Dangote refinery


03/05/24
News
03/05/24

Second WTI cargo heading for Nigeria's Dangote refinery

London, 5 March (Argus) — A cargo of US WTI is on its way to Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery for discharge in March, the second tanker to carry the grade to the west African country's new mega-refinery. The Suezmax Otis loaded a cargo of WTI Midland from the Enterprise Houston terminal in Texas on 18 February, for discharge at Dangote on 13 March, according to Kpler data. Trading firm Vitol chartered the tanker, according to shipping reports and tracking data. A source in the west African crude market told Argus Dangote could be trying different crudes to see which work best and are the most competitive in the market, and sellers would want to strike competitive deals in the hopes of future business with the refinery. Dangote's first WTI crude cargo was on the very large crude carrier (VLCC) Gem No.1 , which has arrived at the port of Lekki with a 2mn bl cargo of WTI . The move by Dangote to purchase crude on the international market may prove frustrating for Nigeria's state-owned NNPC, with whom the plant has a supply agreement. Rather than simply adding a point of additional demand for Nigerian crude, Dangote's opening could effectively increase competition for domestic grades at the Nigerian coast. NNPC may now need to factor in the cost of WTI on a delivered Nigeria basis when setting its monthly formula prices. By Sanjana Shivdas Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

SEC set to vote on climate disclosure rule


03/04/24
News
03/04/24

SEC set to vote on climate disclosure rule

Washington, 4 March (Argus) — The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scheduled to vote Wednesday on whether to adopt rules that would require publicly listed companies to disclose more information about their carbon emissions and climate goals. The disclosure requirements have been among the most contested climate rules taken up under President Joe Biden, given the wide-ranging application of the regulations and a price tag the SEC estimated could be more than $6bn/yr. But the SEC, in the upcoming vote this week, is broadly expected to relax the final rule to lower the cost and reduce the risks of being blocked in court. The SEC first proposed the climate disclosure rule nearly two years ago, with a goal to finalize the rule by the end of 2022. But the agency repeatedly delayed that regulatory timeline amid staunch pushback by business groups and a shifting legal environment, including the US Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in a separate climate case that embraced the "major questions doctrine" to raise doubts over novel regulatory initiatives. The initial proposal would have required large companies with at least $700mn of outstanding shares to start reporting scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions that come directly from operations or from their energy use within about a year of the final rule, with smaller companies having more time to report. The rule would offer more flexibility for scope 3 indirect emissions from a company's value chain, with reporting only required if a company found that information would be "material" to investors. SEC chairman Gary Gensler has said the rules will help standardize the disclosure of climate-related data that many companies are already reporting to investors. The proposal would require public companies to provide more specific information to investors, if they have goals to reduce emissions or plans to reduce climate-related risks. Oil industry groups have warned the SEC that its rule could run afoul of freedom of speech protections in the US Constitution and drive up energy costs for consumers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.