Guyana to hold key election ahead of first oil
Guyana will hold parliamentary elections on 2 March 2020, around the time that ExxonMobil plans to launch offshore oil production that promises to transform the economy of the tiny South American country.
The ruling People's National Congress (PNC) party that has overseen the advent of oil development faces a close challenge from the main opposition People's Progressive Party (PPP), which has pledged to toughen oil contract terms.
Both parties claim to be centrist and pro-business, but the PPP says the terms of Guyana's production-sharing agreements (PSAs) are "too generous" and should have given the country of 780,000 people "a fairer share."
Election observers in Guyana are predicting a tight race, based on traditional voting patterns.
In the outgoing 65-seat assembly, the PNC lost its one-seat majority in a December 2018 confidence vote when one government member voted with the opposition.
Since ExxonMobil started making substantial offshore discoveries in 2015, President David Granger´s administration has signed PSAs with other oil companies, including Chevron, France´s Total, Spain´s Repsol, Italy's Eni, the UK's Tullow and Germany's Dea.
ExxonMobil recently announced a 14th discovery on the deepwater Stabroek, boosting its estimated recoverable resource of more than 6bn bl of oil equivalent (boe), the company said.
ExxonMobil and its partners, US independent Hess and Chinese state-owned CNOOC unit Nexen, plan to start production of the new light crude stream Liza around March 2020 at a rate of 120,000 b/d, ramping up to 750,000 b/d by 2025, a level rivaling that of neighboring Venezuela and outpacing fellow Opec country Ecuador.
Liza has a gravity of 32.1°API and 0.51pc sulfur. ExxonMobil has told Argus that discussions on where preliminary test cargoes will be refined are ongoing.
The PPP says it is "uncomfortable" with the terms of the PSA with ExxonMobil but would not change them as the company is far advanced with its production plans "and any interruption of the schedule to deliver first oil would be damaging to the national economy."
But contracts that were signed with other oil companies after the deal with ExxonMobil will not be upheld by a PPP government "because they were poorly negotiated," the party said.
"We have made it clear that we intend to review every contract that was signed after ExxonMobil's," PPP leader and the country's former president Bharrat Jagdeo said in July.
The PPP's position on the oil sector "is sending negative messages to foreign investors and this could harm the development of the sector," the president's office tells Argus.
"The contract terms were agreed in good faith, and should be respected."
None of the oil companies has responded to a request for a comment on the parties' positions going into the election.
An April 2018 review of the country´s PSA model by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded it was "relatively favorable to investors by international standards."
The government reacted in November 2018 by suspending upstream licensing until 2020 to update future contract terms, the energy department said.
The revised PSAs will be more attractive to oil companies and will increase the country's returns, it said. But current contracts will not be affected.
The PNC and the PPP are united on one threat to offshore exploration in Guyana - a 19th century territorial claim by Venezuela on Guyana's resource-rich Essequibo province, where Stabroek is located.
The dispute has prevented the countries from demarcating their maritime boundary.
Related news posts
Uganda aims for net zero energy sector by 2062
Uganda aims for net zero energy sector by 2062
Kampala, 18 April (Argus) — Uganda has brought forward its target for net zero carbon emissions from its energy sector by three years, to 2062, energy ministry permanent secretary Irene Batebe told an oil and gas conference in Kampala. This new deadline is still lagging some way behind a 2050 "net zero operations" target pledged by 40 oil and gas firms , including African state-owned ones such as Libya's NOC and Sudan's Nilepet, at the UN Cop 28 climate summit. Signatories to the Cop 28 charter also pledged "near-zero upstream methane emissions" by 2030. Uganda's CO2 emissions from fuel combustion were 5.7mn t in 2021, according to most recent IEA data, but this will probably increase with the development of a 230,000 b/d crude project in its western Lake Albert region. The crude project had been scheduled to begin production in late 2025 — although the head of TotalEnergies' Ugandan operations recently said the company may miss this long-standing target. Batebe said the Ugandan government has plans to increase hydroelectricity capacity to around 52GW by 2050, to increase use of solar wind and nuclear power, and has a budget of $8bn by 2030 to finance these. The IEA estimates hydroelectricity accounts for around 90pc of Uganda's generating capacity. But this installed capacity is only around 1.5GW currently. The country's nuclear ambitions remain at the planning stage, and biomass — wood and charcoal — dominates energy consumption. "We want to phase out use of coal, but… countries that produced oil and gas should get out first and we shall follow," she said. "We cannot afford to remain poor. We shall produce our oil and gas responsibly, use LPG from the [planned] refinery and then connect more than the current 57pc of our population to electricity with affordability to use it for cooking and other uses other than lighting then meet our emissions targets." Batebe said the world's longest heated crude export pipeline, which will connect its oil fields with to the port of Tanga on Tanzania's Indian Ocean coast, will be insulated to "three layers" to limit emissions. TotalEnergies' Ugandan general manager Philippe Groueix said the two Lake Albert projects, Tilenga and Kingfisher, are designed to produce crude at 13kg of CO2/bl, far below the world average of 33 kg/bl. TotalEnergies is developing the 190,000 b/d Tilenga field and and Chinese state-controlled CNOOC the 40,000 b/d Kingfisher. By Mercy Matsiko Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US reimposes Venezuela oil sanctions
US reimposes Venezuela oil sanctions
Washington, 17 April (Argus) — The US administration today reimposed sanctions targeting Venezuela's oil exports and energy sector investments and set a deadline of 31 May for most foreign companies to wind down business with state-owned PdV. The US decision rescinds a sanctions waiver issued last October, which allowed Venezuela to sell oil freely to any buyer and to invite foreign investment in the country's energy sector. The waiver, which was due to expire on 18 April, was tied to Caracas' agreement to hold a competitive presidential election and to allow opposition politicians to contest it. Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro's government reneged on that deal by refusing to register leading opposition candidate Maria Corina Machado or an alternative candidate designated by her, a senior US official said. The US considered the potential effects on global energy markets and other factors in its decision, but "fundamentally, the decision was based on the actions and non-actions of the Venezuelan authorities," the official said. The separate waivers granted to Chevron and to oil field service companies Halliburton, SLB, Baker Hughes and Weatherford will remain in place. Chevron will be allowed to continue lifting oil from its joint venture with PdV, solely for imports into the US. US-bound Venezuelan crude volumes averaged 133,000 b/d last year. Chevron said its Venezuela output was 150,000 b/d at the end of 2023. Argus estimated Venezuela's crude output at 850,000 b/d in March, up by 150,000 b/d on the year. PdV said it will seek to change terms of its nine active joint ventures , starting with Spain's Repsol, in an effort to boost production. The reimposition of sanctions will primarily affect Venezuelan exports to India and China. India has emerged as a major new destination for Venezuelan crude since the US lifted sanctions in October, importing 152,000 b/d in March. There are two more Venezuelan cargoes heading to India and are expected to arrive before the 31 May deadline. The VLCC Caspar left the Jose terminal on 14 March and was expected to arrive at a yet-unknown west coast Indian port on 26 April. The Suezmax Tinos left Venezuela on 18 March and was due at Sikka on 30 April. By contrast, Chinese imports of Venezuelan Merey, often labeled as Malaysian diluted bitumen, have been lower since October. Independent refiners in Shandong, which benefited from wide discounts on the sanctioned Venezuelan crude, cut back imports to just a fraction of pre-relief levels. By contrast, state-controlled PetroChina was able to resume imports. The Merey discount to Brent already widened in anticipation of a possible reimposition of US sanctions. Reprieve expected for European companies Separate US authorizations previously issued to Repsol and to Italy's Eni to allow oil-for-debt deals with PdV and to enable a Shell project to import natural gas from Venezuela's Dragon field to Trinidad and Tobago are expected to remain in place. The US sanctions enforcers as a rule do not disclose the terms of private sanctions licenses, and the European companies were not immediately available to comment. The US would still consider future requests for sanctions waivers for specific energy projects, another senior official said. Repsol imported 23,000 b/d of Venezuelan crude into Spain last year and 29,000 b/d so far this year, according to Vortexa data. The last cargo to arrive was on 15 April. Hope springs eternal The US administration says it will consider lifting the sanctions again if Maduro's government allows opposition candidates to participate in the July presidential election. The US action today "should not be viewed as a final decision that we no longer believe Venezuela can hold competitive and inclusive elections," a third senior official said. "We will continue to engage with all stakeholders, including Maduro representatives, the democratic opposition, civil society and the international community to support the Venezuelan people's efforts to ensure a better future for Venezuela." By Haik Gugarats and Kuganiga Kuganeswaran Chinese imports of Venezuelan crude Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US House advances Ukraine, Israel aid bills
US House advances Ukraine, Israel aid bills
Washington, 17 April (Argus) — The Republican-controlled US House of Representatives is preparing to advance a bill to extend military and economic aid to Ukraine, as Kyiv has complained about critical shortages of ammunition on the battlefield and has resorted to aerial attacks against refineries in Russia. The House is also advancing a separate bill to extend military aid to Israel and to pay for the rising cost of US operations in the Middle East, including the cost of providing maritime protection from the Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. Yet another bill would extend military aid to Taiwan and other US partners and allies in the Indo-Pacific region. The US Senate in February approved a bill providing around $60bn in military aid for Ukraine, $14bn for Israel, and $9bn in humanitarian aid to Gaza and other global crisis spots. House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) has, in effect, deconstructed the Senate bill into individual components in an effort to facilitate their passage in a chamber where his party has a two seat majority and the Republican lawmakers allied with former president Donald Trump oppose aid to Ukraine. In an effort to secure the Republican caucus' assent to the three foreign aid bills, Johnson is also planning to advance a separate bill including a hodgepodge of his party's policy priorities, such as a ban on social media network TikTok and sanctions against Iran. Yet another bill would advance draconian restrictions on immigration and strengthen the security of the US-Mexico border. None of the bills released today would require President Joe Biden to reconsider his pause on the issuance of new LNG export licenses. Johnson's legislative proposal has immediately drawn opposition from some members of his party, two of which said they would move to oust him as speaker. Johnson assumed his position after his predecessor Kevin McCarthy was ousted in October following a compromise government funding deal with House Democrats. "Every true conservative America First patriot in the House should vote against the rule for this borrowed foreign aid bill with no border security!" congressman Bob Good (R-Virginia) said via X social network. The foreign aid bills will have to have the backing of the Democratic caucus and a sufficient number of Republicans in order to pass. Biden said he supports the three foreign aid bills proposed by Johnson. "The House must pass the package this week and the Senate should quickly follow," Biden said. The majority-Democratic Senate leaders likewise have signaled willingness to consider separate aid bills so long as those do not significantly differ from the version passed by the Senate. The only major differences in the House version of the Ukraine aid bill is a requirement that the US provide no more than 50pc of the total economic assistance extended to Ukraine by western countries, as well as a requirement for Ukraine to repay the $9.5bn in direct economic support under the bill. Congress since February 2022 has allocated $114bn in aid to Ukraine, including $66bn for military supplies. The EU in the same period has allocated $150bn to Ukraine, mostly in economic support. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
June deadline set for Citgo auction bids
June deadline set for Citgo auction bids
Houston, 17 April (Argus) — Bidders for Citgo's US refining assets have until 11 June to submit offers for the company's 805,000 b/d of refining capacity and associated assets, with a tentative sale hearing set for 15 July. Documents filed Tuesday in the US District Court for the District of Delaware set 11 June as the deadline for interested parties to submit final binding bids after non-binding bids were received 22 January. The court began the auction process for Citgo's parent PdV Holding (PdVH) in October, part of the process of satisfying debts owed by Venezuelan-state owned oil company PdV. The court will file a notice of a successful bid "as soon as reasonably practicable" following the 11 June deadline and selection of a successful bidder. No date has been set for the filing of objections to the sale or replies to the objections before the tentative 15 July hearing. The legal wrangling over Citgo is unlikely to conclude even if the Delaware court successfully executes the sale as 27 businesses have filed claims against Citgo amounting to more than $21bn. The scale of Citgo's operations in the US are also a challenge to any potential buyer. Few companies look ready to buy the company's three refineries, three lubricants plants and retail and midstream assets. The assets have been valued by various analysts anywhere between $6.5bn and $40bn, with a lofty valuation potentially deterring bidders. But the auction process itself has been the main cause for concern. Independent refiner PBF Energy's chief executive Matthew Lucey previously called the auction a "quagmire" , considering its ties to a complex geopolitical situation in Venezuela, saying he did not expect the sale to go anywhere in the near term. Marathon Petroleum expressed similar disdain. "We're not interested in the auction process," Marathon chief executive Michael Hennigan said on an earnings call in October . By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more