US pipeline companies scale back expansions

  • Market: Crude oil, Oil products
  • 19/05/20

US midstream companies have reduced planned crude pipeline capacity expansions by more than 1.4mn b/d through deferrals or scale-backs in the wake of the collapse in oil prices and efforts to contain the Covid-19 pandemic.

Though at least four planned crude pipelines have been deferred or downscaled, other major projects are still in the works, including a 1mn-1.5mn b/d crude and condensate pipeline from the Permian basin to the US Gulf coast.

The US has seen a large midstream build in recent years, pushed by record production and growing demand for exporting US crude. But the collapse in oil prices and the plummet in demand related to the pandemic has put the brakes on the midstream frenzy.

Enterprise Products Partners, a key player in US crude exports, deferred its 450,000 b/d Midland-to-Echo 4 crude pipeline, as part of a $1.1bn drop in capital expenditures in 2020. The line was pushed back about six months and is now expected to start in the second half of 2021, the company said last week. The project is an expansion of Enterprise's system from the Permian to the Houston area.

Enterprise is also building a portion of an ExxonMobil-led 1mn-1.5mn b/d crude and condensate pipeline system. That joint venture (JV) project, known as Wink-to-Webster, involves seven companies, including Plains All American Pipeline and Marathon's midstream segment MPLX. The system will move crude from Wink and Midland in the Permian to multiple locations near Houston, including Webster and Baytown, with connectivity to Texas City and Beaumont. ExxonMobil has a 560,000 b/d refinery in Baytown and a 362,000 b/d refinery in Beaumont.

The most resilient

That Wink-to-Webster project is on schedule to be in service in the first half of 2021, anchored by long term contracts.

Two of the largest refiners in the Gulf coast will buy oil from the Wink-to-Webster line, Plains chief executive Willie Chiang said earlier this month on an earnings call. The project is "a good example of capital efficiency" and "probably the most resilient pipe out there," he said.

Another large midstream company, Energy Transfer, has downscaled the planned Ted Collins pipeline which will connect a terminal in the Houston Ship Channel to Nederland, Texas.

The Ted Collins line will now have a capacity of 275,000 b/d and will use some existing infrastructure to lower costs. The scaled-down project should enter service in the fourth quarter of 2021. The previous plan was for a new-build project with 500,000 b/d of capacity.

US refiner Phillips 66 paused two large crude projects — the Red Oak and Liberty pipelines — and will make a decision on whether to continue them later. Both were previously scheduled to start service in early 2021.

Red Oak, a JV with Plains, would transport crude from the Permian and Cushing, Oklahoma, to Texas ports. That project included leasing capacity on Plains' existing Sunrise pipeline system as well as new builds.

The Liberty pipeline, a JV with Bridger, would have moved 350,000 b/d of Rockies and Bakken production to Corpus Christi. Phillips 66 also postponed a final investment decision on the Ace pipeline project that would connect supply in St James, Louisiana, to refineries in the region.

Other large US pipeline projects remain on schedule even as companies slash spending after the collapse in crude prices which started in early March but hit a new low point on 20 April, when the Nymex WTI front month contract settled in negative territory.

Energy Transfer is moving forward on a plan to expand capacity of its 570,000 b/d Bakken crude pipeline system from North Dakota to the US Gulf coast. The company anticipates expanding the system to "somewhere in the range" of 750,000 b/d but the capacity could go higher depending on discussions with shippers, the company said on an 11 May earnings call.

Energy Transfer said previously that the expansion could nearly double capacity on the line to about 1.1mn b/d. Some of the incremental capacity should be available in the second quarter of 2021. The expansion project only involves adding pump stations, which is a fraction of the cost of building new lines.

The Bakken system includes the Dakota Access pipeline from the Bakken fields in North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois, and the connecting Energy Transfer Crude Oil pipeline to the US Gulf coast.

Three partners are moving forward with a plan to reverse the 1.2mn b/d Capline crude pipeline to move south from Patoka to St James. Marathon, BP and Plains plan to offer light crude shipping in mid-2021 and heavy crude service in 2022.

Plains is also moving forward with a planned expansion of the 200,000 b/d Diamond crude pipeline from Cushing to Memphis, Tennessee, and a 45-mile (72km) pipeline extension to connect it to Capline.

In addition, two large crude projects that cross the US-Canada border are still in the works but facing regulatory and legal delays.

TC Energy's 830,000 b/d Keystone XL pipeline from western Canada to the US midcontinent was dealt another blow last month when a US federal court vacated a key water crossing permit known as Nationwide Permit 12, sending it back to the US Army Corps of Engineers.

"The long-term potential delay with any of these kinds of very omnibus-type filings or motions to vacate a permit that broad could have up to a year delay on the ultimate project," said TC Energy senior vice president of liquids pipelines Bevin Wirzba on 1 May. But the company has been "mitigating those types of impacts," he said.

TC Energy is looking at alternatives in the event the permit is not reinstated, including pursuing different individual permits for some pipeline sections and avoiding certain routes.

Another Canadian company, Enbridge, is moving forward with a project to replace its Line 3 crude pipeline system from Alberta to Wisconsin. Line 3 has been running at 390,000 b/d in recent years, and will be restored to its original capacity of 760,000 b/d.

Minnesota regulators in February approved a revised environmental review for the Line 3 project, but more permits are needed before Enbridge can start US construction. The project is at risk of exceeding its $6.4bn (C$9bn) budget depending on the final in-service date, Enbridge said.

By Eunice Bridges

US pipeline status update
StatusProjectPartnersCapacity '000 b/dOriginDestination
DeferredRed Oak P66/Plains400CushingUS Gulf coast
LibertyP66/Bridger350Rockies/BakkenCushing, OK
Midland-to-Echo 4Enterprise 450MidlandHouston
Scaled backTed CollinsEnergy Transferto 275 from 500HoustonNederland, TX
On trackWink to WebsterExxon/Plains/others1,000-1,500Wink, TexasHouston
Midland-to-Echo 3*Enterprise450MidlandHouston
Dakota Access expansionEnergy Transfer1100BakkenUS Gulf coast
Diamond expansionPlains/Valero400CushingMemphis, TN
Capline reversal Marathon/Plains/BP1200Pakota, ILSt James, LA
Keystone XLTC Energy830Hardisty, AlbertaSteele City, NB
Line 3Enbridge760AlbertaWisconsin
*part of Wink to Webster

New crude pipelines

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Baltimore probe includes potential contaminated fuel

Baltimore probe includes potential contaminated fuel

New York, 28 March (Argus) — Federal authorities are examining whether the containership that crashed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, was burning contaminated marine fuel at the time of the incident. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said it will collect a sample of the fuel on board the 116,851-dwt container vessel Dali as part of its investigation into why the ship lost power and hit the bridge support early on 26 March, taking down the span. "That sample will be taken, and we will analyze the quality, any sort of contaminants, we will look at viscosity," NTSB chair Jennifer Homendy said this week. "That will be part of our investigation." Shipboard power is generally generated by turbines connected to the same engines driving propulsion. There are a number of issues related to fuel that could have led to a loss of power on the ship, according to Wajdi Abdmessih, chief executive at Seahawk Services, a marine fuel testing company based in New Jersey. The fuel on the ship could have been contaminated, as was the case last year when contaminated very low-sulphur fuel oil was found on a number of ships fueld through a Houston, Texas, bunkering operation, or it could have been a compatibility issue with the vessel's engine, where the fuel was not optimized for the equipment. "If the vessel switches between different types of fuels, compatibility and stability issues could occur, which may cause a problem with the engine," Abdmessih said. "Unstable fuel could cause increased sludging and high sediment, which could clog the filter and cause fuel starvation and engine downturns." Singapore-based Synergy Marine Group, which manages Dali , said it is taking part of this investigation but declined to comment possible causes of the accident, including possible fuel contamination. The pilots on board the vessel lost control because of a loss of propulsion, according to the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA), which is assisting in the investigation because Dali was sailing under the Singapore flag. An issue with the ship's propulsion and auxiliary machinery was discovered during its June 2023 inspection in San Antonio, Chile , according to Equasis, a vessel information database. The problem involved the vessel's gauges and thermometers, according to the data. Its most recent inspection was in September 2023, but there are no indications of issues from the inspection. The vessel's next inspection was due in June 2024, the MPA said. By Luis Gronda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

London, 28 March (Argus) — The "best bet" to achieving global energy security is through mitigation funding and multilateral cooperation, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI). WRI highlighted that governments are funding more domestic renewable energy projects but have increased oil and gas production in the name of "energy security" at home in the years following the Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The recent rebrand of energy transition funding to energy security funding has allowed some developed nations to justify domestic oil and gas licences and drag their feet on multilateral financial commitments. This is causing "real worry" among climate-vulnerable developing nations, WRI chief executive Ani Dasgupta said. He said that although the initial "shock" to the world's energy markets after the invasion of Ukraine "quickly went away", it has triggered "real worry among poorer countries that when push comes to shove, it won't be an even game, or have a fair outcome." Developing countries have long complained about the lack of access to climate funding. Richer nations have only recently met the $100bn/yr target in climate finance to developing countries agreed in 2009, while discussions on setting a new climate finance goal for 2025 at Cop 29 in Baku in November could prove difficult. President of the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) Denis Sassou-Nguesso said last year that the $100bn/yr in climate financing to developing countries promised by rich countries "never reached us", adding that the annual UN Cop climate conferences have become little more than a talking shop. "Just after the invasion of Ukraine, every country started to think about energy security," Dasgupta said. "In theory, good things could have happened, countries could have concluded that their best bet to getting energy security is by going renewable". But it was not the case in key consumer countries or regions, Dasgupta pointed out. China bought the majority of Russian gas following the EU's withdrawal, he said, and has since upped production at coal-fired power stations despite an "extraordinary" acceleration towards renewables set for 2023-28, according to Paris-based energy watchdog IEA . In Europe, the UK and Norway continue to award new oil and gas licences . "In the US, the fossil fuel lobby argues that the best route to energy security is to invest more in fossil fuels". But the best route is to invest in more renewables, he said. "Even if the US produces a large amount of oil and gas, it is still a traded commodity, and so you have to pay a price for it that is set globally." The US special presidential co-ordinator for energy security Amos Hochstein has also suggested in September that a widening climate finance gap could ultimately threaten global security. "We have seen the percentage of dollars spent on the energy transition outside the OECD, in developing and middle income countries actually go down instead of up…" By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

ACT to partner with LR, Wartsila, and UECC on CNSL


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

ACT to partner with LR, Wartsila, and UECC on CNSL

London, 28 March (Argus) — Dutch supplier ACT Group is collaborating with classification society Lloyd's Register, Finnish engine manufacturer Wartsila, and Norwegian shipping firm United European Car Carriers (UECC) on the development and evaluation of cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL) as a biofuel in marine biodiesel blends. ACT confirmed the launch of a CNSL-based biofuel called "FSI.100", which has gone through extensive engine testing with various blend combinations. The CNSL-based biofuel has now received approval from engine manufactures to be blended as a 30pc component with marine gasoil (MGO) to form a marine biodiesel blend for the purpose of further sea trials. ACT confirmed that the FSI.100 product will benefit from lower acidity, and there is potential for the product to be compatible for blending with fuel oil. CNSL is an advanced biodiesel feedstock, making it a more appealing and price competitive option to buyers compared with other biodiesel feedstocks. The development follows a report by Lloyd's Register fuel oil bunkering analysis and advisory service (FOBAS) that pointed to a correlation between engine fuel pump and injector-related damage in vessels and the presence of "unestablished" CNSL in the utilised marine fuels. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, is more likely to increase regional gasoline prices than diesel due to additional freight costs and certain route restrictions. Suppliers in the region have so far signaled that the effect on broader markets will be minimal, but regional prices will likely rise, especially as peak summer demand season begins with Memorial Day weekend in late May. The bridge closure could pose more problems for gasoline supply than diesel, since gasoline cannot be transported through the Fort McHenry (I-95) and Baltimore Harbor (I-895) tunnels — the two other major roads that cross the Patapsco River at Baltimore — while there are no restrictions on diesel, according to the Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA). Fuel wholesaler Global Partners said yesterday that it would like to see hours of service waivers for trucking in the region to minimize fuel supply disruption to customers, but the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is yet to issue one. Elevated retail prices are likely to be limited to the immediate Baltimore area but could spill over into neighboring markets should trucking markets remain tight due to rerouting, market sources told Argus . Fuel markets in eastern Maryland can be supplied by PBF's 171,000 b/d Delaware City, Delaware, refinery and two further plants in Pennsylvania — Monroe Energy's 190,000 b/d Trainer refinery and PBF's 160,000 b/d Paulsboro refinery. To the north, United Refining runs a 65,000 b/d plant in Warren, Pennsylvania, and along the Atlantic coast Phillips 66 operates the 259,000 b/d Bayway refinery in Linden, New Jersey. PBF, Monroe and United did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the bridge collapse is affecting refinery operations. Phillips 66 declined to comment on commercial activities. Still, the five nearby refineries — representing all the Atlantic coast's 850,000 b/d of crude processing capacity — are unlikely to see their operations curtailed by limits in shipping products to Maryland. With no refinery in the state of Maryland, most fuels are delivered to Baltimore by Gulf coast refiners on the Colonial Pipeline. Global Partners, which operates a terminal just west of the collapsed bridge, said yesterday it is primarily supplied by the pipeline and expects product flows to continue. Several terminals in the Baltimore Harbor and the nearby Port Salisbury can also receive small vessels and barges of road fuels from Delaware and Pennsylvania, according to the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). The Port of Baltimore — which remains closed since the collapse — took delivery of 24,000 b/d of gasoline and under 2,000 b/d of distillates from barges and small vessels in 2019, about three percent of the Atlantic coast's refining capacity. "A closure of the Port of Baltimore while the Colonial Pipeline is open would not significantly disrupt fuel supply," the MEA wrote in a 2022 analysis of liquid fuels supply in the state. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase

Washington, 27 March (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration has exceeded a price ceiling that has guided when the US government would buy crude to refill the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the latest crude purchase hitting a price of $81.32/bl. The US Department of Energy (DOE) six months ago adopted a new strategy for replenishing the SPR, with a plan to use consistent monthly purchases to replace some of the 180mn bl of crude that Biden sold from the reserve in 2022 after the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. For months, DOE has said it would continue to buy crude so long as it was a "good deal for taxpayers," which the agency defined as a purchase price not to exceed $79/bl. But the agency's latest crude purchase, for nearly 2.8mn bl of sour crude for delivery in September, came at a cost of $225.6mn, an average price of $81.34/bl, according to data DOE recently published on its website. The crude contracts went to Macquarie Commodities Trading, Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals and Total's Atlantic Trading & Marketing. DOE, asked for comment about why it purchased crude in excess of its price target, said there would "likely be news coming later today." Before this week, the administration had largely adhered to its $79/bl price target to buy 24.7mn bl of crude for delivery to the SPR from January through August, with the exception of a $79.10/bl purchase for January delivery. DOE reiterated the price ceiling on 14 March, when it announced a new solicitation to buy crude, and last year had called off multiple crude solicitations when prices came in too high. DOE has previously increased its price ceiling based on shifts in the oil market. DOE in 2022 had initially targeted a purchase price of $67-$72/bl, resulting in the purchase of 6.3mn bl of crude last summer at an average price of $72.67/bl. But after rising prices put that target out of reach, DOE raised its price ceiling to $79/bl. The SPR held 363mn bl of crude as of 22 March, according to federal data. By the end of this year, as a result of crude purchases, the reserve is expected to "be back to essentially where we would have been had we not sold during the invasion of Ukraine," US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm said on 20 March, after accounting for the cancellation of 140mn bl of congressional mandated crude sales that were scheduled through 2031. With the latest crude purchase, DOE will have signed contracts to buy 32.4mn bl of crude at an average price of nearly $77/bl, of which more than 19mn bl has yet to be delivered to the SPR. Another 20mn bl of crude that oil companies and traders borrowed from the SPR in 2022 is set to be returned by year-end, which would push inventories in the reserve to above 400mn bl. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more