Viewpoint: Asia fails to ramp up Paris pledges in 2020

  • Market: Emissions
  • 25/01/21

Joe Biden took executive action to rejoin the global Paris climate agreement in one of his first moves as US president, signalling a term of renewed climate leadership from the world's second-largest greenhouse gas emitter.

A co-ordinated ramp-up in action is needed if the agreement's goal of limiting global temperatures' increase to between 1.5-2°C is to be met. Without additional policies, warming is set to surpass 3°C by the end of the century despite a 7pc emissions dip because of the Covid-19 pandemic this year, according to the UNEP's 2020 emissions gap report. But Asia-Pacific nations unanimously failed to strengthen emissions reduction targets by 2020, the agreement's first rolling five-year deadline.

Major emitters India and China neglected to update climate pledges by the end of 2020, while Japan, South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand, Vietnam and Australia did submit new targets on time but did not increase ambitions, according to climate policy analyst Carbon Brief.

Signatories to the 2015 Paris agreement approved a "ratchet mechanism" that requires they each update emissions targets and policies or nationally determined contributions (NDCs) every five years to steadily raise ambition over time, after governments formally acknowledged their collective commitments from 2015 would not meet the agreement's goal.

China

China, the world's largest emitter, has yet to formally register its new NDC with the UN despite accelerating climate commitments in recent months. Beijing pledged the country would reach peak emissions before 2030 and be carbon neutral by 2060 in September, shortly followed by a long-awaited nationwide emissions trading scheme that starts from February.

But China's unofficial revised 2030 target mentioned at December's UN climate action summit sets it up for overachievement, with ambiguous language contrasting with its bold, clear-cut decarbonisation pledge. At December's summit President Xi Jinping said China aims to cut GDP emissions intensity by "more than" 65pc by 2030 from 2005 levels, up from 60-65pc in its previous NDC. Ambition appears weak given the country has already slashed emissions intensity by over 50pc from the 2005 baseline and at a rate of 20-22pc during recent five-year periods. To achieve the new target, intensity will need to drop by 16pc for each five-year period over the next decade.

But the addition of "more than" is far from negligible and leaves room to scale up efforts. While a 65pc intensity reduction will still allow absolute emissions to rise by around 15pc over the next decade, a 69pc drop will halt emissions growth. China's ministry of ecology and environment is still engrossed in hashing out its climate change strategy and should clarify its plan to 2030 and beyond after the country's parliamentary 2021 two sessions in early March.

Japan, South Korea

Japan and South Korea were among 10 major emitters — contributing over 1pc of global greenhouse gases annually — that met the 2020 deadline, although both resubmitted NDCs unchanged from 2016.

Japan aims to lower emissions by 26pc below 2013 levels by 2030, while South Korea by the same year plans to bring emissions 37pc below business-as-usual (BAU) levels. Independent climate policy tracker Climate Action Tracker (CAT) rates these targets as "highly insufficient", meaning if all governments took a similar approach, warming will reach between 3-4°C by 2100. But both nations have said they will update NDCs in 2021. Ambition in these new targets will be seen as a litmus test of their commitment to decarbonise after they announced plans to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 late last year.

Australia

Australia also left its NDC flat from 2016 and deliberately downplayed rather than ramped up ambitions. Its new submission states the country is "on track to meet and beat [its] 2030 target" of reducing emissions by 26-28pc below a 2005 baseline.

But critics point out this target warranted revisiting in 2020 as it is not yet in line with the Paris agreement goals. The government has also faced criticism for making the target weaker in absolute emissions terms by adjusting historical emissions data between 2016 and 2020 submissions. It set the 2005 baseline at 598mn t of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 2016 but later hiked this up to 611mn t CO2e on changed assumptions about land use emissions.

Unlike large northeast Asian economies, Australia has stressed that it will not revisit its target again before 2025.

Singapore

Singapore altered its 2030 NDC to an absolute emissions cap of 65mn t CO2e from its prior GDP intensity cut target of 36pc from 2005 levels. Absolute emissions targets guarantee reductions regardless of economic growth, but in this case ambitions remain similar despite the change in metric. Singapore is set to overachieve without any policy changes, with 2030 emissions already on course to peak up to 24pc below target at 48.3mn-49.7mn t CO2e in 2030.

New Zealand

New Zealand put forward an unchanged NDC rated as "insufficient" by CAT, though further edits are likely following advice from the country's independent climate change commission due in early 2021. The government has sought to position itself as a global leader in climate policy by enshrining its net-zero emissions by 2050 target into law in the 2019 Zero Carbon Act, although the exemption of methane that makes up 40pc of total emissions weakens this commitment.

Vietnam

Vietnam submitted a slightly improved NDC in 2020 but is still set to vastly outperform its new target, which uses an inaccurate emissions baseline inflated far above its real BAU trajectory. Annual emissions are heading for 448mn-496mn t CO2e by 2030, 40-50pc beneath its NDC target in absolute emissions terms but still consistent with 2-3°C warming.

But the country's revised environmental protection law passed in November 2020 may pave the way for stronger climate policy and deeper emissions cuts. Under the law, which takes effect from 1 January 2022, the government seeks to become the first developing nation to establish carbon pricing, although details have not yet been specified.

India

Though India has not indicated it will update its initial NDC, it is one of the few nations assessed by CAT with a 2030 target in line with 1.5-2°C warming as targeted by the Paris agreement. It is also on track to overperform, as emissions intensity should drop to 37-39pc below 2005 levels by 2030, largely spurred by strong investments in solar and wind power.

But India must plan for a full phase-out of coal by 2040 to remain Paris-compliant beyond the next decade. The agreement requires that signatories peak emissions in the first half of the century and reach net-zero emissions by 2050.

Asia-Pacific emissions, NDCs(mn t CO2e)
Latest historical GHG emissions excl forestryGlobal emissions share %Projected 2030 emissions current post-Covid policy2016 initial NDC to 20302020 updated NDC to 2030Latest NDC in absolute emissions by 2030Latest NDC warming equivalent<2C compatible absolute emissions by 2030
Japan1,238 (2018)2.6905-1,03626% emissions cut below 2013 Unchanged; updates expected 20211,079.03-4°C<327
South Korea714 (2017)1.3665-74337% emissions cut below BAU Unchanged; updates expected 20215393-4°C<316
Australia557 (2017)1.1487-50626-28% emissions cut below 2005 Unchanged445-4673-4°C<386
New Zealand79.6 (2017)0.165-72.130% emissions cut below 2005 Unchanged67.52-3°C<58
Singapore49.3 (2014)0.148.3-49.736% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005Peak emissions at 65mn t CO2e 653-4°C<5.9
Vietnam325 (2014)0.6448-4968% emissions cut below BAU; 25% with international assistance9% emissions cut below BAU; 27% with international assistance903; 748 with assistance>4°C<375
China13,442 (2018)24.312,922-14,66660-65% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005>65% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005 * not official13,744-15,1943-4°C<10,715
India2,993 (2018)6.93,837-4,06633-35% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005No update expected5,350-5,6821.5-2°C<6,463
Malaysia158 (2016) 0.6Unassessed35% cut in emissions intensity of GDP from 2005; 45% with international assistance No update expectedUnassessedUnassessedUnassessed
Indonesia856 (2016)4.71,073-1,32629% emissions cut below BAU; 41% with international assistanceNo update expected1,8173-4°C<1,127

Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Australia to delay mandatory climate reporting to 2025

Australia to delay mandatory climate reporting to 2025

Sydney, 28 March (Argus) — Australia's biggest companies will likely face mandatory climate reporting from 1 January 2025, six months later than originally planned, according to a bill the Australian federal government introduced in parliament. Under the revised proposal, the country's largest companies and financial institutions will need to start disclosing their climate-related risks and opportunities, including scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, within their annual sustainability reports from 1 January 2025 instead of 1 July as previously intended . Scope 3 emissions disclosure will continue to be required from the second year of reporting. Companies will be arranged in three groups, with group 1 entities including companies meeting at least two of three criteria: more than A$500mn ($324mn) of annual revenues, over A$1bn of gross assets, 500 or more employees. Group 2 companies will have lower thresholds — above A$200mn of revenues, $500mn of assets and 250 employees — and will start reporting from the financial year starting on 1 July 2026. Reporting for group 3 entities — those with more than A$50mn of revenues, $25mn of assets and 100 employees — will begin from 1 July 2027. The 1 January 2025 start date might be pushed further to 1 July 2025, if the bill does not become law before 2 December. It will now be debated in parliament and needs to pass both houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives, before receiving royal assent. Its approval will support more investment in renewable energy as well as help companies and investors manage climate risks, the government said. Companies are currently not required to report their scope 3 emissions under Australia's National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act, which is used to measure and report GHG emissions and energy production and consumption. Scope 3 can include emissions within supply chains that occur inside or outside Australia, such as emissions from the combustion of Australian coal or LNG exported to other countries. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Oil transition plans inadequate for investors: Report


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Oil transition plans inadequate for investors: Report

London, 27 March (Argus) — Oil and gas producers' energy transition plans are "insufficient for investors to accurately gauge transition risk", according to a report released today from investor initiative Climate Action 100+ and investor research group Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI). Several companies measured have net zero goals, but there is an "absence of disclosure on critical elements", which makes it difficult for investors to understand how companies will achieve net zero, as well as the transition risks posed. The lack of sufficient transition plans presents a "material financial risk", Climate Action 100+ said. The report assessed 10 publicly-listed oil and gas producers — European firms BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell and TotalEnergies, and North American companies Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Occidental and Suncor. The companies scored lowest against 'alignment' metrics, measuring if they are in line with the Paris climate agreement that seeks to limit global warming to 1.5°C above the pre-industrial average. "More disclosure is required on the central aspects of transition planning, including measures to neutralise emissions, and production forecasts", TPI found. Companies assessed failed to score on 87pc of metrics related to quantifying emissions cuts, and on 89pc of metrics related to future oil and gas production. Most North American firms assessed have stated they plan to lift output, the report noted. But "without acknowledging the impact of the transition on the core business, companies risk deploying capital that… accentuates the risk of assets becoming stranded", it said. The report flagged a stark difference between the two regions. "European companies provide substantially better disclosure, set more aligned targets and are investing more in climate solutions", it said. North American firms are "not planning to meaningfully diversify into low carbon energy production", while European ones are exploring a range of lower-carbon options, including biofuels, hydrogen and renewable power. The companies assessed are also not reaching for "easy wins" on methane abatement, with just two having "convincing strategies" on this, the report found. Of the 10 companies, seven have joined reduction initiative the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership, but "most companies have not set a methane emissions reduction target with a clear and specific base and target year." Investment is crucial for companies looking to decarbonise. A report this week from non-profit CDP and consulting firm Oliver Wyman found that more than half of corporations in high-emitting sectors said access to capital was "a key concern in decarbonisation efforts". Their report analysed data from 1,600 European companies, which reported via CDP's environmental disclosures programme. "This implementation gap between concrete business actions and stated climate goals persists despite most businesses reporting they have a transition plan and emissions reduction targets in place", CDP said. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia softens fuel efficiency standard targets


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Australia softens fuel efficiency standard targets

Sydney, 27 March (Argus) — The Australian federal government has agreed on draft legislation for its fuel efficiency standards for new passenger and light commercial vehicles, which will come into effect with reduced targets and later than originally proposed. The scheme will start on 1 January 2025 as planned by the government but manufacturers will not begin earning credits or penalties until 1 July 2025. This will enable it to prepare and test data reporting capabilities in partnership with the industry, the federal government said. Some sport utility vehicles, such as the Toyota Landcruiser and Nissan Patrol models, will also be recategorised as light commercial vehicles that will now have smoother targets compared with the government's preferred model released in early February. The government said this reflects recent adjustments announced by the US Environmental Protection Agency to its vehicle standards, which gave US auto manufactures more time to scale up the production of electric vehicles (EVs). Under Australia's proposed emissions standards, whose bill was introduced for a vote in parliament on 27 March, manufacturers will be set an average carbon dioxide (CO2) target for the range of vehicles they sell. Those will be lowered over time to mandate the sale of more fuel efficient, low or zero emissions vehicles. Companies that exceed their emissions targets will receive credits, which they might sell to less efficient manufacturers or use in future years. Those that fail to meet the requirement will need to make it up over the following two-year period, pay a penalty or acquire credits. The government's preferred model was criticised by the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) as unreasonable , given the short timeframe for manufacturers to adjust their fleets. The FCAI welcomed the changes made by the government, although it said it would still need to review the draft legislation in detail to understand the impact to the industry and consumers. Associations such as the Electric Vehicle Council of Australia and the Climate Council supported the bill, with the former saying the "strong, ambitious standards" will drive a greater update of EVs. Charging boost Together with the bill, the federal government announced it will provide A$60mn ($39.2mn) to boost EV charging at Australian car dealerships. It said the standards will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from new passenger vehicles by more than 60pc by 2030, while those from new light commercial vehicles will be nearly halved over the same period compared with a 60pc reduction originally. Environmental group Greenpeace said the final proposal is a meaningful effort to reduce transport pollution but it will achieve only 80pc of the emissions reduction originally planned for light commercial vehicles. "The decision to weaken the standards when it comes to light commercial vehicles will mean around 20pc more carbon pollution will be allowed by 2030 compared to the original proposal, so we expect the government will be looking at other options for reducing pollution from transport in order to meet their climate targets," Greenpeace said. Transport makes up 98mn t/yr or 21pc of Australia's total GHG emissions. By 2030 it is expected to be the largest source of emissions as the electricity sector decarbonises. Government data show that on average passenger cars in Australia emit at a rate 20pc higher than the US vehicle fleet. Passenger cars contribute 41mn t/yr of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), or 42pc of all transport emissions, with light commercial vehicles emitting 18mn t/yr CO2e or 18pc of total transport emissions. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Electrification key to cut UK offshore emissions: NSTA


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Electrification key to cut UK offshore emissions: NSTA

London, 27 March (Argus) — The UK offshore oil and gas industry must make "decisive emissions reduction actions now and on an ongoing basis", with asset electrification and low carbon power central to making cuts, regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) said today. "Where the NSTA considers electrification reasonable, but it has not been done, there should be no expectation that the NSTA will approve field development plans", the regulator said in a new emissions reduction plan. The NSTA set out "four clear contributing factors to decarbonising the industry" — including asset electrification, investment and efficiency and action on flaring and venting. It will also look at "inventory as a whole", ramping up scrutiny on assets with high emissions intensity. Relevant companies must produce emissions reduction action plans for offshore assets, the NSTA said. New developments with first oil or gas after the beginning of 2030 must be either fully electrified or run on "alternative low carbon power with near equivalent emission reductions", the NSTA said. New developments with first oil or gas before 2030 should be electrification-ready at minimum. If electrification is not reasonable, other power emissions reductions must be sought, the regulator said. The offshore industry must from 1 June provide "a documented method of the split of projected flaring and venting figures into categories", and must from 1 June 2025 have a plan and budget to "deliver continuous improvements in flaring and venting", it said. New developments — including tie-backs — must be planned on the basis of zero routine flaring and venting, which every asset must reach by 2030. Industry flaring almost halved between 2018-22, the NSTA said. The regulator has flagged a particular focus on methane emissions. The NSTA may require developers to agree to cease production of assets with high emissions intensity "with reference to societal carbon values", it said. Societal carbon values are calculated by the UK government to reflect the marginal cost to society of additional CO2 emissions. It will discuss end dates for production for assets with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity 50pc over the average for the UK offshore, and which intend to produce oil or gas beyond 2030. This represents a slight watering down of the initial plan the NSTA consulted on last year. The North Sea Transition Deal, agreed in 2021, commits the UK offshore industry to reducing its production emissions of GHGs by 10pc by 2025, by 24pc by 2027 and by 50pc by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. Industry has itself committed to a 90pc reduction by 2040 and a net zero basin by 2050, the NSTA said. It "would welcome industry owning and delivering these reductions", it said, adding that its plan is focused on emissions cuts and "emissions offsetting will not be considered towards meeting the obligations." By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Germany sees no return to easy EU climate decisions


26/03/24
News
26/03/24

Germany sees no return to easy EU climate decisions

Brussels, 26 March (Argus) — German environment minister and green party politician Steffi Lemke has warned that easy decision-making processes for climate change and environment policies in the EU are unlikely to return after the election in June. This comes after a key EU vote on a provisional deal for climate, nature and environment was withdrawn because of a lack of member state support. Global challenges and geopolitic "are all too profound" to go back to what the EU decision-making process was like five years ago, Lemke said. But she noted that ultimately depends on the EU elections results in June and "how far extreme and populist parties gain majorities". This comes as the adoption the nature restoration law was cancelled yesterday after a number of countries, including Hungary, withdrew their support. Lemke said the vote was supposed to be "a formality" but that it is now unclear whether the law can still pass in this legislative period. The European Parliament had previously approved the nature restoration law, agreed with EU states, that commits EU countries to restoring at least 30pc of habitats in poor condition by 2030, 60pc by 2040, and 90pc by 2050. Lemke said that not adopting the nature restoration law would leave the EU more exposed to climate change. "We'll not be able to manage climate risks without nature in order," she said. Unstable ecosystems exacerbate the problems faced because of climate change, for the economy, infrastructure, human health, she said. "It's also about protecting agriculture from climate change". "US insurers are withdrawing from different regions because they can't insure climate risks anymore". "We shouldn't make the mistake of scoring easy points against climate and environmental protection," she added. "Climate-friendly states will try to get [the law] up for adoption at a later date," she added. When asked whether Germany has some responsibility for encouraging others to block provisional agreements on EU laws, she said that the country has not always been an "easy negotiation partner". But Lemke pointed out that Germany had finally approved many important laws, most recently the packaging and packaging waste regulation . The phase-out of the internal combustion engine had been particularly difficult for the German government. Other member states have also encountered major difficulties in securing government approval or parliamentary support, she said, pointing again the geopolitical situation after Russia's attack on Ukraine. Many countries have seen populist parties and right-wing extremist parties fueling uncertainty, and have had to contend with the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and global inflation. "This had made democratic governance significantly more difficult in the member states themselves, but also in Europe," she said. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more