Oil executives push carbon fee idea in US Senate
ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips executives are joining other companies to lobby the US Senate for a "carbon dividends" plan that would put a fee on greenhouse gas emissions starting at $40/t and send the revenue back to taxpayers.
The idea has a slim chance of advancing soon because of widespread Republican opposition to a carbon tax and a lukewarm reaction to the concept from Democrats. But the executives' meetings this week with more than a dozen Republican and Democratic senators could lay the groundwork for a policy that supporters say would be more cost-effective and predictable than a mix of climate regulations.
"No other climate policy will go further in lowering emissions, stimulating innovation across the economy, boosting American competitiveness and supporting families than carbon dividends," said Climate Leadership Council chief executive Greg Bertelsen, whose group organized the meetings.
President Joe Biden has not backed a carbon tax, and instead wants to fund a $2 trillion infrastructure plan through higher corporate tax rates. The administration plans to achieve deep emission cuts through new climate regulations, subsidizing cleaner energy sources and enacting a national "energy efficiency and clean energy standard" that would target net-zero greenhouse gas emissions in the power sector by 2035.
But corporate supporters of a carbon tax say it could achieve larger emission cuts across the economy and at a lower cost. The carbon dividend idea would include a steadily rising carbon fee, typically paid for by refiners, importers, natural gas producers and coal mines. The Climate Leadership Council has proposed setting a $40/t carbon fee that would rise at 5pc/yr and then be refunded to taxpayers. It would pre-empt most climate rules and create a "border carbon adjustment" for US trade with countries that lack a comparable carbon pricing system.
"A well-designed price on carbon is the most effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the economy," said ConocoPhillips executive vice president Matt Fox, who is attending the meetings this week.
Democrats have yet to rally behind a carbon tax, taking lessons from a proposed "Btu tax" on energy in 1993 and a failed cap-and-trade bill in 2010 that created easy fodder for attack ads that said Democrats wanted to increase prices for gasoline and heating. The party also worries that a carbon tax, even one that is refunded, would have a disproportionate effect on low-income families.
Environmentalists have worried a carbon tax could worsen pollution in minority areas and not achieve the deep emission cuts needed to avert the worst effects of climate change. And the environmental community is loathe to trade away regulatory powers, which now require 60 votes in the Senate to change, for a carbon tax that could be invalidated with just 50 votes.
Other oil companies are working on legislative efforts in support of climate-focused regulations. BP, Shell, Norway's Equinor and Total over the last two weeks have said they support lawmakers using a fast-track mechanism called the Congressional Review Act to "disapprove" a rule imposed under former president Donald Trump that rolled back direct methane regulations.
Related news posts
Volatile energy prices risk the transition: IEF
Volatile energy prices risk the transition: IEF
Houston, 18 September (Argus) — High or volatile energy prices risk undermining emissions reductions efforts, International Energy Forum (IEF) secretary-general Joseph McMonigle said today at the Gastech conference in Houston, Texas. "If the public starts to connect high prices and volatility to the energy transition, we're in big trouble and we risk losing public support for the transition and climate policy," he said. McMonigle made his comments on a panel with several energy ministers, who discussed the issues of balancing energy security concerns with transitioning to cleaner fuel sources for electricity. When asked what he would consider a "call to action" for the global energy sector, McMonigle suggested investments in emerging technologies. "I think to allow trading of carbon credits is really important to accelerate the transition," he said. "Also, to provide financing for CCS (carbon capture and storage), which I think is one of the technologies that does not have enough investment behind it." By David Haydon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Citgo auction result delayed amid last-minute motions
Citgo auction result delayed amid last-minute motions
Houston, 18 September (Argus) — The US court-appointed special master overseeing the auction of US refiner Citgo plans to object to a last-minute motion from the Venezuelan government to delay the sale process by four months. The Republic of Venezuela and state-owned oil company PdV filed a motion on Tuesday seeking a four-month pause in the sale of its refining subsidiary Citgo, which is being auctioned off to satisfy debts owed by PdV. Special master Robert Pincus said in a court filing today that he intends to object to Venezuela's motion for a pause. The last-minute motion from Venezuela comes days after the US District Court for the District of Delaware was expected to announce results of the winning bidder. The court asked for a second extension to the auction process in August, delaying announcing a successful bidder to on or about 16 September with a sale hearing on 7 November. But Pincus is now dealing with last-minute legal challenges filed last week outside of the Delaware courts by so-called "alter ego" claimants seeking to "circumvent" the Delaware court's sales process and "jump the line" for enforcing claims against PdV, the special master said in a filing last week. Bidders for Citgo's 804,000 b/d of refining capacity, terminals, retail fuel stations and other plants expect the assets to be sold free and clear of future claims by PdV creditors. Unresolved legal liabilities could lower the value bidders are willing to pay for Citgo, decreasing the pool of money available to those owed by PdV. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US seeks to purchase 6mn bl for SPR
US seeks to purchase 6mn bl for SPR
Washington, 18 September (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration is trying to purchase 6mn bl of sour crude for delivery to the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) as part of a plan to issue solicitations when prices are "favorable for taxpayers." The US Department of Energy (DOE) today released a solicitation to purchase up to 6mn bl of sour crude for delivery in February-May to the SPR's Bayou Choctaw site in Louisiana. If the purchase is successful, it would be the largest single purchase since the Biden administration launched its crude purchase program in early 2023. The solicitation offers a chance for the administration to buy crude for the SPR at a lower price than earlier purchases. Nymex WTI crude futures for delivery in February settled at $68.41/bl on Tuesday. The lowest-priced crude purchase under Biden was a 1.7mn purchase at a price of $72/bl in June 2023, and the average purchase price is about $76/bl. Bids for the solicitation are due by noon ET on 25 September. DOE has already purchased more than 50mn bl of sour crude for the SPR, of which 30mn bl have already been delivered. On 9 September, DOE said it purchased 3.42mn bl of sour crude for the SPR's Bryan Mound storage site at a price of $72.46/bl from the trading firm Macquarie Commodities Trading. The crude will be delivered in January-March, adding to an earlier purchase of nearly 2.5mn bl that will be delivered to the Bryan Mound site over the same time frame. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Wash. regulators plan for cap-and-trade vote
Wash. regulators plan for cap-and-trade vote
Monterey, 18 September (Argus) — Washington regulators are making a "contingency" plan in the event of a successful repeal of the state's emissions cap-and-trade program. Initiative 2117, which looks to repeal the state's cap-and-trade program and prevent any similar program from taking its place, will be on state ballots for the 5 November election. "We are doing contingency planning in case the ballot measure passes and will update our covered entities when we do have information — and I know this initiative is creating a lot of uncertainty," said Stephanie Potts, senior planner with the state Department of Ecology today at the Argus North American Biofuels, LCFS & Carbon Markets Summit in Monterey, California. The agency also remains focused on continuing to implement the program, "assuming it continues," she said. Washington's "cap-and-invest" program requires large industrial facilities, fuel suppliers, and power plants to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 45pc by 2030 and by 95pc by 2050, from 1990 levels. The department is in an ongoing rulemaking process to expand and amend its carbon offset protocols, and also continues work to gather input for linkage with the Western Climate Initiative, a linked carbon market between California and Quebec. Potts said Washington expects to have a linkage agreement in place by the end of next year. The uncertainty introduced by the ballot initiative over the fledgling market's future has tempered carbon credit prices and activity this year. Argus assessed Washington carbon allowances (WCAs) for December delivery at $30.25/metric tonne on 4 March, their lowest price since the program's inception in 2023. The drop in prices at that time coincided with a statement by Ecology outlining how a successful repeal would end the agency's authority over the program. Earlier this year, the state Office of Financial Management (OFM) released a fiscal impact statement on a successful repeal that assumed an effective repeal date would be 5 December. By Denise Cathey and Jessica Dell Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more