Agreement to revive JCPOA 'within reach': Update

  • Market: Crude oil
  • 05/19/21

Updates throughout

Talks to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal have made significant progress to date and a breakthrough is "within reach," delegates participating in the negotiations in Vienna said today.

"In these last two weeks, we have been successful in moving a lot of things forward," said Iran's deputy foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, who has been leading the Iranian delegation at the talks. "We can now say that we have reached a framework or structure of an agreement," Araqchi said.

The latest round of indirect US-Iranian talks has been underway since early May.

The discussions have "really helped to crystallize choices that need to be made by Iran, as well as by the US in order to come back into a mutual return to compliance with the JCPOA," the State Department said today, referring to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal.

US special Iran envoy Rob Malley, who is leading the US delegation in Vienna, will return to Washington today but is expected to participate in the next round of talks in Vienna early next week.

"We have made good progress. An agreement is shaping up," the EU's deputy foreign affairs secretary Enrique Mora said following a meeting of the joint commission of the JCPOA. Mora, who has been co-ordinating the joint commission's meetings since talks aimed at bringing the US back to the JCPOA began last month, said he is confident an agreement will be reached. Russia's ambassador to Vienna-based international organisations, Mikhail Ulyanov, struck a similarly positive tone after the meeting, saying that the participants noted "good or significant progress" and that "an agreement is within reach."

The toughest obstacle has been addressing the US sanctions imposed in 2018-2020 that even President Joe Biden's administration views as "poison pills" designed to sabotage a future return to the agreement. Iran insists that all those sanctions need to be removed.

Biden's administration says it will remove only those sanctions that prevent smooth functioning of Iran's economy.

That means that the US would be prepared to remove the "terrorism" labels imposed on Iran's central bank, state-owned NIOC and other oil sector entities. But Washington is loath to remove the same label from Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — a military force with extensive political and economic interests.

A breakthrough at the talks in Vienna should lead to an easing of US economic sanction against Iran, including restrictions that at one point removed more than 2mn b/d of Iran's crude exports from international markets and pushed Iranian crude output to below 2mn b/d, a level not seen since the start of the Iran-Iraq war in the early 1980s.

Iran already has increased exports since January, by supplying as much as 800,000 b/d to China in recent months. But that outlet for Iran's exports may be affected by a recent regulatory change in Beijing. The handful of Chinese companies prepared to clear Iranian crude through customs ran out of import quotas in late April and have since been warned against that practice.

The diplomats in Vienna are racing against the clock to reach a deal ahead of the Iranian presidential election, which is due to take place in less than a month. With incumbent Hassan Rohani unable to stand for re-election because he has already completed two four-year terms in office, there is a real concern among the JCPOA stakeholders that his successor — widely expected to be from within Iran's more conservative camps — could prove more challenging to negotiate with.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
03/06/24

US SEC adopts weaker climate disclosure rule

US SEC adopts weaker climate disclosure rule

Washington, 6 March (Argus) — Far fewer companies will be required to begin disclosing climate-related information under a rule the US Securities and Exchange (SEC) finalized today, in a retreat from more ambitious climate reporting requirements proposed in 2022. Publicly traded companies will still have to disclose to investors if they have "material" climate-related risks, under the final rule adopted today, in addition to whether they have processes to manage those risks. But in a major change from the proposal, the SEC will only require companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions data if they would be material to investors, with no reporting at all of "scope 3" emissions that arise from a company's supply chain. The rollback of the rule marks a victory for oil companies, manufacturers and business groups that said the proposed rule — which the agency initially estimated could cost more than $6bn/yr — was too burdensome and was unlikely to offer useful information to investors. Critics were particularly opposed to SEC's initial push for some disclosure of scope 3 emissions, which they said would create a dragnet forcing companies to collect emissions data across their supply chains, even from private and small companies that might consider that data confidential. The final rule also aligns closer with the status quo. Many large companies, including major oil companies, already voluntarily disclose their direct "scope 1" and "scope 2" greenhouse gas emissions to their investors through annual reports, in addition to other information related to any material climate-related risks they face. But SEC chairman Gary Gensler said the rule, approved in a 3-2 vote, will offer investors more "consistent, comparable and decision-useful information" on a company's greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks. Investors will end up having far more useful information as a result of the rule, he said, replacing an existing voluntary structure under which companies decided on their own what climate information to tell investors. Despite the rule's rollbacks, state-level Republicans are preparing to challenge the rule in court, based partly on complaints that the SEC has veered away from its investor protection mandate and instead is trying to set climate policy. West Virginia attorney general Patrick Morrisey, who plans to file a lawsuit on behalf of at least nine states later today in the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, said one problem with the rule is it would be "virtually impossible" for companies to decide if their emissions are material to investors. Environmentalists also said they are considering filing a lawsuit challenging the removal of the stringent sectons of the rule, while also defending the SEC's authority to require climate disclosures for publicly traded companies. The SEC's two Republican commissioners voted in opposition. The rule marks the culmination of activist attempts to "hijack" securities laws to further climate-related goals, commissioner Mark Uyeda said. The disclosure mandate will result in a "flood of climate-related" data that will "overwhelm" investors but not necessarily offer useful information, SEC commissioner Hester Peirce said. 'Bare minimum' Environmentalists say the disclosure requirement could be useful but would be far more effective if it was finalized as proposed, concerns echoed by Gensler's fellow Democratic commissioners. The final rule is the "bare minimum" for climate-related disclosure and was "better for investors than no rule at all," SEC commissioner Caroline Crenshaw said in explaining her decision to support the new climate rule. Under the rule, companies with at least $700mn in outstanding shares will have to disclose material climate-related risks in fiscal year 2025. Those companies will also have to begin disclosing material "scope 1" and "scope 2" greenhouse gas emissions — which come from direct operations and buying electricity — in fiscal year 2026, but with reporting deferred until their second quarterly report to offer time to gather data. The climate risk disclosures will take effect a year later for companies with at least $75mn of outstanding shares, and those companies do not have to begin disclosing material greenhouse gas data until fiscal year 2028. Any smaller publicly held companies will have to report climate-related risks in fiscal year 2027, with no disclosures required at all of greenhouse gas data. The SEC had initially proposed requiring greenhouse gas reporting for all public companies, with no materiality requirement. The SEC retained requirements for companies to report more information if they have plans to reach climate-related targets and goals. If a company is using carbon offsets or renewable energy credits as a "material component" of its climate goals, it will have to start disclosing any relevant costs and losses. In another part of the rule, the SEC will require companies to disclose in financial statements any costs, charges and losses in excess of a 1pc threshold that arise as a result of severe weather, droughts, wildfires, sea-level rise or other natural conditions. The rule's importance has somewhat diminished in the years since the SEC first proposed the mandate. California last year enacted a law to require public and private companies with business in the state and at least $1bn/yr in revenue to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions, including scope 3 emissions, starting as soon as 2026. The SEC rule will not preempt state disclosures, agency staff said. The SEC initially aimed to finalize the rule by the end of 2022. But the agency repeatedly delayed that timeline amid a shifting legal environment, including the US Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in a separate climate lawsuit that embraced the "major questions doctrine" that raised doubts over novel regulatory initiatives. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Houthi strike kills mariners on bulk carrier


03/06/24
News
03/06/24

Houthi strike kills mariners on bulk carrier

Washington, 6 March (Argus) — A direct attack on a bulk carrier in the Gulf of Aden today killed members of the ship's crew, marking the first fatalities from attacks on commercial shipping by Yemen's Houthi militants. The bulk carrier True Confidence suffered a hit and the crew abandoned the ship following the attack, the UK Maritime Trade Organization said. Ships describing themselves as the "Yemeni Navy," a designation used by the Houthi militant group's naval arm, approached the True Confidence , which was moving toward the Red Sea, and forced the bulk carrier to alter course, UK maritime security firm Ambrey said. A Houthi spokesperson said that the bulk carrier was targeted because it was a US-owned vessel. The True Confidence is Barbados-flagged and Liberia-owned, the White House said. "It was not a US ship, contrary to what the Houthis claimed," it said. The US State Department said the fatalities were the first among commercial ship crews since since Houthis started to attack ships transiting near Yemen in November. "That was, sadly, inevitable," the State Department said. "The Houthis have continued to launch the reckless attacks with no regard for the well being of innocent civilians who are transiting through the Red Sea. And now, they have, unfortunately and tragically, killed innocent civilians." The attacks by the Houthi militants have prompted many vessel operators to take the longer and more expensive route around the Cape of Good Hope, driving up freight rates. No LNG carriers have transited the Suez Canal this month either, following attacks on shipping by the Houthis in recent months. The US strategy of conducting air strikes against targets in Yemen, patrolling the Red Sea and trying to choke off supply of Iranian materiel to the Houthis has so far not succeeded in stopping the attacks. A senior US defense official told a Senate panel last week that the Pentagon has no definite end in sight for its campaign of air and missiles strikes against Houthi militants in Yemen, implying that the threat to Red Sea shipping lanes could remain acute for months to come. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Second WTI cargo heading for Nigeria's Dangote refinery


03/05/24
News
03/05/24

Second WTI cargo heading for Nigeria's Dangote refinery

London, 5 March (Argus) — A cargo of US WTI is on its way to Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery for discharge in March, the second tanker to carry the grade to the west African country's new mega-refinery. The Suezmax Otis loaded a cargo of WTI Midland from the Enterprise Houston terminal in Texas on 18 February, for discharge at Dangote on 13 March, according to Kpler data. Trading firm Vitol chartered the tanker, according to shipping reports and tracking data. A source in the west African crude market told Argus Dangote could be trying different crudes to see which work best and are the most competitive in the market, and sellers would want to strike competitive deals in the hopes of future business with the refinery. Dangote's first WTI crude cargo was on the very large crude carrier (VLCC) Gem No.1 , which has arrived at the port of Lekki with a 2mn bl cargo of WTI . The move by Dangote to purchase crude on the international market may prove frustrating for Nigeria's state-owned NNPC, with whom the plant has a supply agreement. Rather than simply adding a point of additional demand for Nigerian crude, Dangote's opening could effectively increase competition for domestic grades at the Nigerian coast. NNPC may now need to factor in the cost of WTI on a delivered Nigeria basis when setting its monthly formula prices. By Sanjana Shivdas Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

SEC set to vote on climate disclosure rule


03/04/24
News
03/04/24

SEC set to vote on climate disclosure rule

Washington, 4 March (Argus) — The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is scheduled to vote Wednesday on whether to adopt rules that would require publicly listed companies to disclose more information about their carbon emissions and climate goals. The disclosure requirements have been among the most contested climate rules taken up under President Joe Biden, given the wide-ranging application of the regulations and a price tag the SEC estimated could be more than $6bn/yr. But the SEC, in the upcoming vote this week, is broadly expected to relax the final rule to lower the cost and reduce the risks of being blocked in court. The SEC first proposed the climate disclosure rule nearly two years ago, with a goal to finalize the rule by the end of 2022. But the agency repeatedly delayed that regulatory timeline amid staunch pushback by business groups and a shifting legal environment, including the US Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in a separate climate case that embraced the "major questions doctrine" to raise doubts over novel regulatory initiatives. The initial proposal would have required large companies with at least $700mn of outstanding shares to start reporting scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions that come directly from operations or from their energy use within about a year of the final rule, with smaller companies having more time to report. The rule would offer more flexibility for scope 3 indirect emissions from a company's value chain, with reporting only required if a company found that information would be "material" to investors. SEC chairman Gary Gensler has said the rules will help standardize the disclosure of climate-related data that many companies are already reporting to investors. The proposal would require public companies to provide more specific information to investors, if they have goals to reduce emissions or plans to reduce climate-related risks. Oil industry groups have warned the SEC that its rule could run afoul of freedom of speech protections in the US Constitution and drive up energy costs for consumers. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US oil pipeline flows at record high in 4Q


03/04/24
News
03/04/24

US oil pipeline flows at record high in 4Q

Houston, 4 March (Argus) — Crude pipeline volumes for the four biggest US midstream operators logged a record high of 16.5mn b/d in the fourth quarter, according to company data, mostly driven by rising flows from the Permian basin. Overall flows were up by 6pc from the previous quarter and up by more than 50pc from the 10.8mn b/d logged in the first quarter of 2021, which was the low-water mark for the Covid-19 pandemic cycle. Flows remained well above the baseline level of 14.3mn b/d set in the first quarter of 2020, before pandemic-induced demand shocks and a battle for market share between Saudi Arabia and Russia sent crude prices tumbling to historic lows. Permian basin pipeline operators' fates are closely tied to field producers in west Texas and eastern New Mexico, who saw an unprecedented drop in output in April 2020 along with a day of negative pricing at the US pipeline hub of Cushing, Oklahoma. The tides have since turned in the Permian, where rising output drove overall US crude production to an all-time record of 13.3mn b/d in December. ExxonMobil's $59.5bn takeover of US independent Pioneer Natural Resources doubles down on the prolific basin's staying power. US midstream operator Plains All American Pipeline said it expects output from the Permian to set a fresh record high in 2024, synchronizing with oil majors' plans to boost production in the top-performing shale basin. Permian output is expected to grow to 6.4mn b/d in 2024 from 6.1mn b/d in 2023, Plains said in an investor presentation. Place your bets The increase will be mainly driven by efficiency gains, as the number of active rigs in the basin holds at 300-320 horizontal rigs. "Our bet would be on the US [exploration and production companies], that they would figure out how to get higher recoveries" from the Permian basin, Plains executive vice-president Al Swanson said. Plains' projections are in line with recent guidance from top US oil majors, who are targeting longer lateral wells and faster drilling times to squeeze more output from existing infrastructure. Chevron aims to boost Permian output by 10pc this year, while ExxonMobil expects 7pc growth from its operations there. Long-haul volumes on Plains' crude pipelines rose by 17pc from the previous quarter to 1.6mn b/d and were up by 7pc from year-earlier levels. Plains said it expects high utilization on the 670,000 b/d Cactus II pipeline, its joint venture with Enbridge, which runs from the Permian to Corpus Christi, Texas, on the central coast. It also expects rising volumes on its Basin pipeline system from Midland, Texas, to the US midcontinent storage hub at Cushing. The lion's share of gains in output from the top four US midstream operators came from Plains and Energy Transfer, while Enterprise Products Partners' volumes held steady and NuStar volumes were up by 100,000 b/d to 1.3mn b/d. Energy Transfer set record volumes on its crude pipeline system in the fourth quarter as production from the Permian rose. Texas crude transport volumes rose by 39pc from a year earlier to 5.9mn b/d, driven by rising output from the Permian. Crude volumes also got a boost from Energy Transfer's recent acquisitions. Energy Transfer in August agreed to buy Crestwood Equity Partners in a transaction valued at $7.1bn, after moving to purchase Lotus Midstream in March for $1.45bn. The Lotus acquisition assets included the Centurion pipeline that connects Permian producers with the hub at Cushing, and more than 2mn bl of storage capacity in Midland. Volumes on Energy Transfer's Bakken pipeline were higher because of rising output from the Bakken shale in North Dakota, and volumes on its Bayou Bridge system in Louisiana grew because of strong Gulf coast refinery demand. Energy Transfer's crude exports from its terminals in Nederland and Houston, Texas, fell to 3.4mn b/d, down by 5pc from the previous quarter's record of 3.6mn b/d but up by 16pc from a year earlier. Enterprise Products Partners posted record volumes on its crude pipelines and marine terminals in the fourth quarter. Crude pipeline transportation volumes increased to a record 2.6mn b/d in the fourth quarter, up marginally from the previous quarter and a 32pc increase from a year earlier, with increased flows on its Midland-to-Echo system from the Permian to the Houston area. Enterprise moved a record 1mn b/d at its crude oil marine terminals in the fourth quarter, up slightly from the previous quarter and up by 32pc from a year earlier, with rising volumes at the Enterprise Hydrocarbons Terminal (EHT) on the Houston Ship Channel. "We are seeing more crude across our docks," Enterprise co-chief executive Jim Teague said. By Chris Baltimore Key Permian basin pipelines Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.