Viewpoint: IMO regs to further stretch tanker fleet

  • Market: Crude oil, Freight, Oil products
  • 23/12/22

Supply tightness in the global tanker market will likely be exacerbated in 2023 as new environmental regulations incentivize slow steaming and increased demolitions of older, less-efficient vessels by shipowners.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) will implement two new regulations on 1 January 2023, the Carbon Intensity Indication (CII) and the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI). Both regulations will require shipowners to measure the emissions efficiency of their vessels, with the CII measuring a vessel's actual emissions on a yearly basis and grading the vessel between A (best) and E (worst); and the EEXI measuring a vessel's theoretical emissions based entirely on the vessel's design and specifications, not how it actually operates.

Market participants have questioned the efficacy of the regulations, particularly the CII, with many saying the regulation will lead to higher maritime carbon emissions because shipowners will be able to achieve better grades for their less-efficient vessels by using them for longer voyages, while modern, "eco vessels" will be able to easily achieve a compliant grade (C or better) when trading short-haul shipments.

Slow steaming, scrapping, secondhand sales

But whether or not the regulations are effective in reducing carbon emissions, they will lead to moves that will put upward pressure to tanker rates.

More shipowners will permanently "slow steam" their vessels in order to achieve a compliant CII grade because when a vessel sails slower it emits less carbon. This will effectively tighten the global tanker fleet because ships will spend more time in transit and less time available to load cargoes.

Shipowners can also retrofit existing vessels with new engines or other energy-savings devices in order to comply with regulations, but this might not be economical for some vessels near the end of their life spans. Because of this, the new regulations will likely accelerate the demolition of older vessels, which will further tighten the global tanker fleet.

Alternatively, many larger, commercial shipowners have been offloading their older vessels on the secondhand market rather than scrapping them. Resale activity for tankers older than 15 years has been plentiful this year because of strong demand from smaller, more opaque owners who many expect will use the vessels as part of the "shadow fleet" to move sanctioned Russian barrels. This is another factor that will limit tonnage supply for commercial trades, as vessels involved in sanctioned trades are unlikely to be acceptable to the spot market because of legal or insurance reasons.

Fleet tightness to persist through 2024

The new IMO regulations come amid elevated freight rates, with current earnings in excess of $50,000/d across most crude and refined product tanker markets. The high rates have been driven by shifting flows caused by the Russia-Ukraine conflict along with continued export demand recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic, both of which have stretched the global fleet.

And little relief will come from newbuild deliveries, as the clean tanker fleet is forecast to grow by just 0.9pc next year, down from 1pc this year, while the crude tanker fleet is forecast to grow by 1.7pc, down from 5.4pc this year, according to Bimco.

This dearth of tanker deliveries will extend into at least 2025, as shipyard capacity is nearly entirely filled by orders for containerships and LNG tankers through the end of 2024.

"Even if we wanted to ruin the market — even if all of us here were to say, ‘let's go out and order 150 product tankers' — you can't do it," Hafnia Tankers chief executive Mikael Skov said at a conference in June. "So that may be one of the most important parts of the market having legs."


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
27/03/24

No timetable yet for reopening Port of Baltimore

No timetable yet for reopening Port of Baltimore

New York, 27 March (Argus) — US Transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg said today he is unable to provide a timetable as to when the Port of Baltimore will fully reopen. The channel that vessels use to access the majority of the port is blocked by the 116,851dwt container vessel Dali and the remains of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which collapsed when the crew lost control of the Dali and it slammed into a bridge support. "No matter how quickly the channel can be reopened, we know that it can't happen overnight," Buttigieg said in a briefing at the White House. While the original bridge took five years to construct, that does not necessarily mean it will take five years to replace, he added. Buttigieg, in a televised interview, said administration officials are in discussions with the operators of a logistics center outside the main port, Tradepoint Atlantic at Sparrows Point, to see if it can step up operations to handle more cargo, at least on a temporary basis. On Wednesday the Wolfsburg , a regularly scheduled roll-on-roll-off vessel for Volkswagen, was able to stop at Tradepoint's site. Tradepoint said it was the first cargo arriving at the Port of Baltimore since "the tragic accident on Tuesday." The Army Corp of Engineers, which has been brought in to restore the waterway, is moving "very aggressively" to deploy resources and equipment, said Vice Admiral Peter Gautier, deputy commandant for operations of the US Coast Guard. And the ship's operator has brought in Resolve Marine, a marine salvage company, to refloat the vessel and remove it from the area, according to the Coast Guard. Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) boarded the vessel late Tuesday and are back on the ship on Wednesday. The agency has recovered the data from the voyage data recorder and sent it to the NTSB lab. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Baltimore bridge collapse to raise retail fuel prices

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — The collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, is more likely to increase regional gasoline prices than diesel due to additional freight costs and certain route restrictions. Suppliers in the region have so far signaled that the effect on broader markets will be minimal, but regional prices will likely rise, especially as peak summer demand season begins with Memorial Day weekend in late May. The bridge closure could pose more problems for gasoline supply than diesel, since gasoline cannot be transported through the Fort McHenry (I-95) and Baltimore Harbor (I-895) tunnels — the two other major roads that cross the Patapsco River at Baltimore — while there are no restrictions on diesel, according to the Maryland Transportation Authority (MTA). Fuel wholesaler Global Partners said yesterday that it would like to see hours of service waivers for trucking in the region to minimize fuel supply disruption to customers, but the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is yet to issue one. Elevated retail prices are likely to be limited to the immediate Baltimore area but could spill over into neighboring markets should trucking markets remain tight due to rerouting, market sources told Argus . Fuel markets in eastern Maryland can be supplied by PBF's 171,000 b/d Delaware City, Delaware, refinery and two further plants in Pennsylvania — Monroe Energy's 190,000 b/d Trainer refinery and PBF's 160,000 b/d Paulsboro refinery. To the north, United Refining runs a 65,000 b/d plant in Warren, Pennsylvania, and along the Atlantic coast Phillips 66 operates the 259,000 b/d Bayway refinery in Linden, New Jersey. PBF, Monroe and United did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether the bridge collapse is affecting refinery operations. Phillips 66 declined to comment on commercial activities. Still, the five nearby refineries — representing all the Atlantic coast's 850,000 b/d of crude processing capacity — are unlikely to see their operations curtailed by limits in shipping products to Maryland. With no refinery in the state of Maryland, most fuels are delivered to Baltimore by Gulf coast refiners on the Colonial Pipeline. Global Partners, which operates a terminal just west of the collapsed bridge, said yesterday it is primarily supplied by the pipeline and expects product flows to continue. Several terminals in the Baltimore Harbor and the nearby Port Salisbury can also receive small vessels and barges of road fuels from Delaware and Pennsylvania, according to the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA). The Port of Baltimore — which remains closed since the collapse — took delivery of 24,000 b/d of gasoline and under 2,000 b/d of distillates from barges and small vessels in 2019, about three percent of the Atlantic coast's refining capacity. "A closure of the Port of Baltimore while the Colonial Pipeline is open would not significantly disrupt fuel supply," the MEA wrote in a 2022 analysis of liquid fuels supply in the state. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ethanol constraints minor on Baltimore closure: Update


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Ethanol constraints minor on Baltimore closure: Update

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — Ethanol flows in the US northeast may only see minor near term constraints following the closure of the Port of Baltimore due to the collapse of a bridge at the mouth of the waterway. Producers and other market participants expect longer local transit times for trucks carrying hazardous materials — including ethanol — to retail stations because of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which carried nearly 12.4mn cars and trucks in 2023, according to Maryland state data. This will lead to higher associated costs, but market sources say the region's supply chain flexibility, rail access and available stocks should mitigate near-term ethanol supply interruptions. Ethanol rail deliveries into the Baltimore market are expected to increase, offsetting the loss of barge supply for the duration of the port's closure. Railroads Norfolk Southern and CSX have rail access at the Port of Baltimore, while Kinder Morgan operates the primary transload terminal. US east coast ethanol stocks in March are at their highest monthly average since April 2020 at 8.76mn bl, according to the Energy Information Administration. By Payne Williams Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Ethanol constraints minor from Baltimore port closure


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Ethanol constraints minor from Baltimore port closure

Houston, 27 March (Argus) — Ethanol flows in the US northeast may only see minor near term constraints following the closure of the Port of Baltimore due to the collapse of a bridge at the mouth of the waterway. Producers and other market participants expect longer local transit times for trucks carrying hazardous materials — including ethanol — because of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, which carried nearly 12.4mn cars and trucks in 2023, according to Maryland state data. This will lead to higher associated costs, but market sources say the region's supply chain flexibility, rail access and available stocks should mitigate near-term ethanol supply interruptions. Ethanol rail deliveries into the Baltimore market are expected to increase, offsetting the loss of barge supply for the duration of the port's closure. Railroads Norfolk Southern and CSX have rail access at the Port of Baltimore. US east coast ethanol stocks in March are at their highest monthly average since April 2020 at 8.76mn bl, according to the Energy Information Administration. By Payne Williams Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

US breaks $79/bl ceiling in latest SPR purchase

Washington, 27 March (Argus) — President Joe Biden's administration has exceeded a price ceiling that has guided when the US government would buy crude to refill the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), with the latest crude purchase hitting a price of $81.32/bl. The US Department of Energy (DOE) six months ago adopted a new strategy for replenishing the SPR, with a plan to use consistent monthly purchases to replace some of the 180mn bl of crude that Biden sold from the reserve in 2022 after the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. For months, DOE has said it would continue to buy crude so long as it was a "good deal for taxpayers," which the agency defined as a purchase price not to exceed $79/bl. But the agency's latest crude purchase, for nearly 2.8mn bl of sour crude for delivery in September, came at a cost of $225.6mn, an average price of $81.34/bl, according to data DOE recently published on its website. The crude contracts went to Macquarie Commodities Trading, Sunoco Partners Marketing & Terminals and Total's Atlantic Trading & Marketing. DOE, asked for comment about why it purchased crude in excess of its price target, said there would "likely be news coming later today." Before this week, the administration had largely adhered to its $79/bl price target to buy 24.7mn bl of crude for delivery to the SPR from January through August, with the exception of a $79.10/bl purchase for January delivery. DOE reiterated the price ceiling on 14 March, when it announced a new solicitation to buy crude, and last year had called off multiple crude solicitations when prices came in too high. DOE has previously increased its price ceiling based on shifts in the oil market. DOE in 2022 had initially targeted a purchase price of $67-$72/bl, resulting in the purchase of 6.3mn bl of crude last summer at an average price of $72.67/bl. But after rising prices put that target out of reach, DOE raised its price ceiling to $79/bl. The SPR held 363mn bl of crude as of 22 March, according to federal data. By the end of this year, as a result of crude purchases, the reserve is expected to "be back to essentially where we would have been had we not sold during the invasion of Ukraine," US energy secretary Jennifer Granholm said on 20 March, after accounting for the cancellation of 140mn bl of congressional mandated crude sales that were scheduled through 2031. With the latest crude purchase, DOE will have signed contracts to buy 32.4mn bl of crude at an average price of nearly $77/bl, of which more than 19mn bl has yet to be delivered to the SPR. Another 20mn bl of crude that oil companies and traders borrowed from the SPR in 2022 is set to be returned by year-end, which would push inventories in the reserve to above 400mn bl. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more