UK releases further detail on CCS plans

  • Market: Biomass, Electricity, Emissions, Hydrogen
  • 30/03/23

The UK government today set out further information on its plans for carbon capture and storage (CCS), including seeking applications to establish two new CCS clusters.

As as part of a co-ordinated net zero strategy day, the government called for applications under its so-called Track 2 scheme, which aims to establish two further CCS clusters in the UK by 2030. The HyNet and East Coast clusters were selected in October 2021 under the Track 1 process, for deployment by the mid 2020s.

Track 2 applicants must either have a CO2 storage licence or have applied for one, and they must have "relevant agreements and commitments in place" with capture projects, the government said. Criteria for eligible Track 2 capture projects have not yet been set out.

The Acorn and Viking projects are "best placed to deliver on the government's objectives", the government said, though its call for applicants will remain open until 28 April. Acorn, in Scotland, missed out in the Track 1 scheme, but the government's Scottish Affairs Committee recently called for its approval. Viking, off the east coast of England, is targeting a start date of 2027 and a capture rate of 10mn t/yr of emissions by 2030. It is led by UK independent Harbour Energy and partners include Associated British Ports, power producer West Burton Energy, refiner Phillips 66 and trading firm Vitol's power plant subsidiary VPI.

The government also today said eight carbon capture projects have progressed to a "negotiations project list" of the Track 1 programme. These include three industrial carbon capture, two energy from waste, one power with carbon capture, usage and storage (CCUS) and two hydrogen projects. London also promised a forthcoming "updated investment roadmap on CCUS, summarising government policy and funding", and "a vision for the UK CCUS sector to raise confidence and improve visibility for investors".

The UK aims to capture 20mn-30mn t/yr of CO2 by 2030 and estimates that up to 100 stores may be needed to hit these targets.

Beccs model progresses

The UK also today clarified its preferred approach to support bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (Beccs), and utility Drax said it will start formal discussions with London to move forward its Beccs project in the country.

Drax — which last week paused its Beccs plans, calling for clarity on government support — now "stands ready to progress [its] £2bn investment programme and deliver this critical project for the UK by 2030," chief executive Will Gardiner said today.

The UK government plans to use a dual contracts for difference (CfD) business model to support Beccs. The model combines a CfD for low-carbon electricity generation and one for carbon captured. The policy has not been finalised, and the government said today it will continue development and to engage with interested parties. The biomass strategy, expected by the end of June, will set out sustainability considerations for Beccs, it said.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
28/03/24

Long-term contracts needed to stabilise gas prices: MET

Long-term contracts needed to stabilise gas prices: MET

London, 28 March (Argus) — Germany and Europe need more LNG and business-to-business long-term contracts to even out supply shocks and stabilise gas prices, even as demand is unlikely to reach historical heights again, chief executive of Swiss trading firm MET's German subsidiary Joerg Selbach-Roentgen told Argus . Long-term LNG contracts have a "stabilising effect" on prices when "all market participants know there is enough coming", Selbach-Roentgen said. He is not satisfied with the amount of long-term LNG supply contracted into Germany, arguing that stabilisation remains important even now that the market has "cooled down" after the price shocks of 2022. Long-term contracts are important for the standing of German industry, Selbach-Roentgen said — not to be reliant on spot cargoes is a matter of global competitiveness for the industrial gas market, he said. The chief executive called for more long-term contracts in other areas as well, such as for industrial offtakers, either fixed price or index-driven. Since long-term LNG contracts are concluded between wholesalers and producers, the latter need long-term planning security for their projects, which usually leads to terms of about 20 years. But long-term LNG contracts in general do not represent a major risk for MET nor for industrial offtakers in Europe, Selbach-Roentgen said. LNG is a more flexibly-structured "solution" to expected demand drops in regard to the energy transition as the tail end can be shipped to companies on other continents such as Asia if European demand wanes, he said. Gas demand is not likely to recover to "historical heights" again, mostly driven by industrials "jumping ship", Selbach-Roentgen said. When talking to large industrial companies, the discussion is often about the option that they might divert investments away from the German market as the price environment is "not attractive enough" for them any longer in terms of planning security, the chief executive said. This trend started out of necessity in reaction to the price spikes but may now be connected to longer-term "strategic" considerations, he said. In addition, industrial decarbonisation — as well as industrial offtakers' risk aversion because of the volatile gas market following Russian gas supply curtailments — leads companies to invest less into longer-term gas dependencies in Germany, Selbach-Roentgen said. In addition, MET advocates for a green gas blending obligation of 1-2pc green gas or hydrogen, in line with legislative drafts under discussion by the German government. This has already met with interest by offtakers, despite uncertainties around availability and prices, and would provide a regulatory framework that allows firms to prepare for the energy transition, Selbach-Roentgen said. By Till Stehr and Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Stalling climate finance an energy security risk : WRI

London, 28 March (Argus) — The "best bet" to achieving global energy security is through mitigation funding and multilateral cooperation, according to the World Resources Institute (WRI). WRI highlighted that governments are funding more domestic renewable energy projects but have increased oil and gas production in the name of "energy security" at home in the years following the Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The recent rebrand of energy transition funding to energy security funding has allowed some developed nations to justify domestic oil and gas licences and drag their feet on multilateral financial commitments. This is causing "real worry" among climate-vulnerable developing nations, WRI chief executive Ani Dasgupta said. He said that although the initial "shock" to the world's energy markets after the invasion of Ukraine "quickly went away", it has triggered "real worry among poorer countries that when push comes to shove, it won't be an even game, or have a fair outcome." Developing countries have long complained about the lack of access to climate funding. Richer nations have only recently met the $100bn/yr target in climate finance to developing countries agreed in 2009, while discussions on setting a new climate finance goal for 2025 at Cop 29 in Baku in November could prove difficult. President of the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville) Denis Sassou-Nguesso said last year that the $100bn/yr in climate financing to developing countries promised by rich countries "never reached us", adding that the annual UN Cop climate conferences have become little more than a talking shop. "Just after the invasion of Ukraine, every country started to think about energy security," Dasgupta said. "In theory, good things could have happened, countries could have concluded that their best bet to getting energy security is by going renewable". But it was not the case in key consumer countries or regions, Dasgupta pointed out. China bought the majority of Russian gas following the EU's withdrawal, he said, and has since upped production at coal-fired power stations despite an "extraordinary" acceleration towards renewables set for 2023-28, according to Paris-based energy watchdog IEA . In Europe, the UK and Norway continue to award new oil and gas licences . "In the US, the fossil fuel lobby argues that the best route to energy security is to invest more in fossil fuels". But the best route is to invest in more renewables, he said. "Even if the US produces a large amount of oil and gas, it is still a traded commodity, and so you have to pay a price for it that is set globally." The US special presidential co-ordinator for energy security Amos Hochstein has also suggested in September that a widening climate finance gap could ultimately threaten global security. "We have seen the percentage of dollars spent on the energy transition outside the OECD, in developing and middle income countries actually go down instead of up…" By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Australia to delay mandatory climate reporting to 2025


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Australia to delay mandatory climate reporting to 2025

Sydney, 28 March (Argus) — Australia's biggest companies will likely face mandatory climate reporting from 1 January 2025, six months later than originally planned, according to a bill the Australian federal government introduced in parliament. Under the revised proposal, the country's largest companies and financial institutions will need to start disclosing their climate-related risks and opportunities, including scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, within their annual sustainability reports from 1 January 2025 instead of 1 July as previously intended . Scope 3 emissions disclosure will continue to be required from the second year of reporting. Companies will be arranged in three groups, with group 1 entities including companies meeting at least two of three criteria: more than A$500mn ($324mn) of annual revenues, over A$1bn of gross assets, 500 or more employees. Group 2 companies will have lower thresholds — above A$200mn of revenues, $500mn of assets and 250 employees — and will start reporting from the financial year starting on 1 July 2026. Reporting for group 3 entities — those with more than A$50mn of revenues, $25mn of assets and 100 employees — will begin from 1 July 2027. The 1 January 2025 start date might be pushed further to 1 July 2025, if the bill does not become law before 2 December. It will now be debated in parliament and needs to pass both houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives, before receiving royal assent. Its approval will support more investment in renewable energy as well as help companies and investors manage climate risks, the government said. Companies are currently not required to report their scope 3 emissions under Australia's National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act, which is used to measure and report GHG emissions and energy production and consumption. Scope 3 can include emissions within supply chains that occur inside or outside Australia, such as emissions from the combustion of Australian coal or LNG exported to other countries. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Japan’s Renova starts Miyagi biomass power plant


28/03/24
News
28/03/24

Japan’s Renova starts Miyagi biomass power plant

Tokyo, 28 March (Argus) — Japanese renewable power developer Renova started commercial operations today at its 75MW Ishinomaki Hibarino biomass-fired power plant in northeast Japan's Miyagi prefecture. The power plant is designed to consume an undisclosed volume of wood pellets and palm kernel shells (PKS) to generate around 530 GWh/yr of electricity. Renova originally targeted to start up the power plant in May 2023 but postponed the start-up multiple times. Renova has been forced to delay the start-up schedules at several of its power plants. It previously targeted to begin commercial operations of the 75MW Omaezaki biomass power plant this month but postponed it to July, as the final adjustment of boiler and turbine units is taking longer than expected. It delayed the launch of the 74.8MW Tokushima Tsuda biomass power plant in September before it began commercial operations in December 2023 . Japan imported 1mn t of wood pellets during January-February, up by 14pc from the same period in 2023, according to the finance ministry. PKS purchases fell by 24pc to 466,186t. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Africa’s H2 project development lags behind: report


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Africa’s H2 project development lags behind: report

London, 27 March (Argus) — The development of renewable hydrogen projects in Africa is lagging behind the global pace with only 1pc of African project volume having already reached final investment decision (FID) compared with a global average of 7pc, Brussels-based industry body Hydrogen Council said in a report. The projects that have moved to FID in Africa are small-scale ventures, located mainly in the southern part of the continent and focused on mobility or industrial applications, according to the Council's investment tracker. Even projects at an earlier stage in Africa are trailing behind development in other parts of the world. While 20pc of project investment volume are at front-end engineering design (FEED) stage or further globally, only 5pc of projects have progressed beyond FEED in Africa. The lag in project development is driven by perceived risks in African jurisdictions such as political and monetary instability, the Hydrogen Council said. Underdeveloped infrastructure also contributes to delays and uncertainty. Given the "right enabling conditions," Africa could supply 15pc of expected globally traded hydrogen volume which would translate into 1mn t/yr in exports by 2030, 5mn t/yr by 2040 and 11mn t/yr by 2050, according to the study. But realising these targets would require $400bn in investment. African countries offer promising cost-competitive renewable energy resources, but unlocking this potential will "require coordinated efforts across public and private sectors" and the creation of a "legal framework that helps mitigate risks," industrial gas firm Linde's chief executive and Hydrogen Council co-chair Sanjiv Lamba said. Most of the projects announced in Africa so far focus on exports to Europe and Asia, but demand within the continent could also drive adoption in the long-run, the authors point out. Applications in chemicals, refining and transportation in African countries could generate demand of 6.5mn t/yr by 2050. Industry participants in developing countries have long called for more financing mechanisms such as blended finance to help projects gather momentum in locations considered more risky and uncertain for investment. The largest projects in the pipeline are planned in North African countries such as Morocco , Egypt and Mauritania . By Pamela Machado Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more