Global brands drive China recycled packaging demand
In recent years, the recycled plastics market is shifting from low-cost alternatives to high-quality recycling promoted by environmental protection and carbon reduction. Argus interviewed Guo Jiawan, chairman of Guangxi Guolong, and Arnold Wang, founder of Shichai Environment, on the following topics before the Second International Rigid Polyolefin Recycling Summit hosted by Shichai Environment:
- Prospects of China’s recycled plastics exports
- Food contact applications of recycled plastics
- EU’s “mirror-clause” in the Single Use Plastics Directive, etc
How much demand do you see from export markets for your products, what are the key export markets, and for which products and end-use applications (rPET, rHDPE, rPP, Packaging grades)?
Guo: The application of recycled plastics in the packaging market is mainly driven by the demand from international brands. Large brands use environmentally friendly recycled products as a way to actively fulfill their social responsibility and promote the recycling and utilization of waste plastics through their actions. In the Chinese market, international brands have been testing and trialing small batches of recycled plastics over the past two years. In the Southeast Asia, Hong Kong and Macau markets, they have begun to introduce recycled plastic packaging products. Many international brands also have production sites in China, and their export products have started to use recycled plastics. In the personal care sector, they primarily use rHDPE and rPP, while in food packaging, rPET is the main material, all of which must meet food-grade requirements and obtain FDA or EFSA certification.
Most participants are focusing on food contact recycled materials, but China currently does not allow recyclates to be used in food-contact applications. In such a situation, how should Chinese recyclers develop their business? Would pyrolysis be an appropriate approach for Chinese recyclers to look towards?
Wang: Currently, the main applications for high-value products from Chinese PET recycling enterprises are textile fibers, industrial yarns, and other non-food grade uses. Food-grade rPET products can also meet specific needs in personal care products, and other food-grade rPET supplies include exports to Hong Kong and overseas markets.
Pyrolysis is still in the exploratory stage in China, and several commercial projects have been announced this year, but their operation will take some time and still requires market validation. On August 27-28 this year, we will have an International Rigid Polyolefin Recycling Summit in Shanghai, which will include topics related to chemical recycling and pyrolysis. Those who are interested are welcome to follow and participate.
The EU is mulling a “mirror-clause” in the Single Use Plastics Directive which would mean that recyclers from outside the EU that are sending material to the EU to count towards our recycled content targets will be held to the same feedstock, process and environmental targets as European recyclers. How do you expect this to develop and do you see any impact on your business?
Guo: [Complying with EU standards] is not difficult for Guolong Recycled Plastics, because the process technology, production equipment and environmental standards of Guolong are the same as those in Europe, as is the the use of PCR materials.
Over the past few years, Guolong have passed various tests, factory inspections, and production environment assessments required by more than twenty international brand companies, and safely met their requirements. But, if the EU pushes this policy, it might implement certification permits through factory inspections under a case-by-case basis, which might impose certain restrictions on many other recycling enterprises in China.
What is Guolong's future development target, and does Guolong plan to invest in chemical recycling in the near future?
Guo: After ten years of development, Guolong has now established sizeable capacity for producing recyclates for a range of different end-uses (see table). We have successfully implemented a business model that spans the entire industrial chain, encompassing both food-grade and industrial-grade products. Currently the company has no concrete expansion plans for the future.
| Recycling type | Capacity (t/yr) |
| Food-grade rPET | 60,000 |
| Food-grade rHDPE | 20,000 |
| Food-grade rPP | 20,000 |
| Pipe grade recyclates | 80,000 |
| Industrial grade rHDPE | 20,000 |
Do you expect to see a market start to develop for recyclates into the food packaging market in China in the near future (i.e. a change of regulation) and what other regulatory changes in China do you expect that could support the recycling industry?
Wang: China is currently researching the safety of using recycled materials in packaging applications, which includes not only recycled plastics but also recycled metals, such as whether recycled aluminum can be used for cans. The local market is also awaiting the issuance of relevant documents.
Presently, the government has introduced various policies such as the "trade-in" policy and the reverse invoicing policy, which have all promoted the expansion of the recycling industry. These allow recyclers to issue invoices to their waste suppliers (rather than the other way around), to enable recyclers to claim a VAT deduction even when the waste seller they are working with is too small to issue invoices. Government policy may also be directed towards waste classification in the future, this could be the direction for future government policy.
Of course, establishing a complete recycling system requires more implementation strategies and more time to explore development paths and undertake construction.
Spotlight content
Related news
US Jones Act waiver may alter PX trade flows
US Jones Act waiver may alter PX trade flows
Houston, 19 March (Argus) — The US' 60-day waiver of domestic shipping requirements under the Jones Act may change the trade flows of paraxylene (PX) and aromatic blendstock in the near-term, sending US Gulf coast production to US Atlantic coast consumers. PX consumers based on the US Atlantic coast (USAC) largely rely on imports from overseas for their needs. Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Brunei, the Netherlands, Taiwan and India were all sources of US PX imports before US-imposed tariffs starting last year shuffled the deck. Saudi Arabia has since become the majority PX trade partner, accounting for over 50pc of flows, according to US Census Bureau data compiled by Global Trade Tracker. But with the US-Iran war bringing vessel movement through the strait of Hormuz to a virtual halt, supplies have tightened for several products, including PX and feedstocks. This has boosted PX prices by $365.65/t since the war began on 28 February to $1,438.73/t on 13 March, according Argus' most recent weekly assessment. PX produced at the US Gulf coast (USGC) is typically consumed within that region, so shipping cargoes to USAC consumers has not been a factor in trade. But the rise of USGC 5211-grade MX since 28 February by 102¢/USG to 389.5¢/USG through 18 March — combined with the 60-day Jones Act waiver — may change that. Market sources tell Argus the higher prices and temporary removal of the higher costs associated with the Jones Act could prompt greater USGC PX production to ship to the Atlantic coast. The waiver could also boost shipments of USGC toluene and MX to the USAC for gasoline blending, another source said, although US blenders tend to prefer alkylate from Europe over reformate or aromatic blendstocks. Alkylate imports are exempt from US tariff policy because of their use in the energy sector. Benzene and styrene shipments will largely be unaffected by the Jones Act waiver because many of those consumers are tied in with refineries, pipelines or receive their volume from inland barges, another source said. By Jake Caldwell and Savanna Millhausen Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Vinmar in 15-year offtake deal for Citroniq PP
Vinmar in 15-year offtake deal for Citroniq PP
Houston, 19 March (Argus) — Global polymer trader Vinmar has agreed to buy corn-based polypropylene (PP) from Citroniq's planned Nebraska plant under a binding 15-year offtake agreement. The deal represents half of Citroniq's 600,000 t/yr PP capacity at the plant, which is expected to begin production in 2029, the Houston, Texas-based companies said last week. The project will use a corn-to-ethanol-to-propylene-to-polypropylene process. Growing corn removes carbon from the air, and Citroniq's process sequesters that carbon in PP pellets, making the polymer "carbon negative", according to the company. Vinmar's Premier Product Marketing unit has agreed to distribute the Citroniq resin, to be sold as OrganiqPP, through its global petrochemical logistics network. The long-term commitment reflects rising demand for low-carbon, drop-in polymers that are compatible with existing processing equipment, Citroniq said. The company expects adoption across packaging, consumer goods, automotive and industrial markets. By Dona Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
LyondellBasell seeks 35¢/lb hike for US PE through May
LyondellBasell seeks 35¢/lb hike for US PE through May
Houston, 19 March (Argus) — LyondellBasell is seeking a total price increase of 35¢/lb for US polyethylene (PE) contracts over the next three months signaling that the company believes higher prices have some staying power. In an 18 March letter, LyondellBasell informed customers that in addition to the 10¢/lb increase it is planning for March contracts, it was revising its earlier 10¢/lb increase for April contracts higher to 15¢/lb and adding another 10¢/lb increase for May contracts. All other producers have announced a 10¢/lb increase for March, which one market participant described as "a slam dunk". Other producers have announced additional increases of between 10-15¢/lb for April. It was not immediately clear whether other producers have also announced May price increases. "If you are a supplier, you want to aim high because you don't want to cap your ability to be able to raise prices when you need to," said a US PE distributor. "Things are going crazy, and they want to make sure they can implement whatever they need." The price hikes stem from global polymer supply disruptions and feedstock disruptions in the Middle East and throughout Asia due to the US-Israel war on Iran, which is creating new demand for resin out of the US. Buyers are growing increasingly concerned about the price increase announcements, fearing that the higher prices may stick for some time. "A big chunk of these increases is probably going to go in," said one US PE buyer. "It is freaking chaos." The increases are making it difficult for buyers to plan because it is hard to gauge at what price demand destruction will take place. "We need to know how to plan," the buyer said. "This doesn't really help for longer-term business." For now, some buyers are trying to purchase extra cars to get ahead of the price increases, but supply is very tight, and there is limited availability. By Michelle Klump Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
California packaging law challenged
California packaging law challenged
Houston, 19 March (Argus) — A coalition of packaging and business groups has sued to block California's "truth in labeling" law, arguing the recyclability label mandate set to take effect in October 2026 will burden companies and distort recycling markets. The groups argue that SB 343, enacted in 2021, could make it more difficult for consumers to correctly identify recyclable packaging and ultimately increase landfill volumes. Clear and consistent labeling is essential for maintaining circularity across grocery, food service and agricultural packaging supply chains, the plaintiffs said. SB 343 prohibits companies from using the chasing arrows recycling symbol or making recyclability claims unless their packaging meets state verified collection and processing criteria. The law is the first at the US state level to bar the chasing arrows symbol on products that do not qualify as recyclable under California's standards. CalRecycle has published a list of materials that meet the criteria, including PET, HDPE/LDPE and PP rigid containers, along with certain multi use products. To qualify, a material must be collected for recycling by at least 60pc of California residents, and recycling facilities must sort it into defined streams representing at least 60pc of statewide programs. Companies will have until early October 2026 to implement any required label or mold changes. The law also ties into SB 54, California's extended producer responsibility (EPR) program for single use packaging. While SB 343 governs recyclability labeling for all products and packaging, SB 54 sets broader 2032 requirements for recyclability and compostability. But SB 54 relies on the definitions established under SB 343, making the labeling law foundational to the EPR program's implementation. By Dona Davis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.