Global brands drive China recycled packaging demand
In recent years, the recycled plastics market is shifting from low-cost alternatives to high-quality recycling promoted by environmental protection and carbon reduction. Argus interviewed Guo Jiawan, chairman of Guangxi Guolong, and Arnold Wang, founder of Shichai Environment, on the following topics before the Second International Rigid Polyolefin Recycling Summit hosted by Shichai Environment:
- Prospects of China’s recycled plastics exports
- Food contact applications of recycled plastics
- EU’s “mirror-clause” in the Single Use Plastics Directive, etc
How much demand do you see from export markets for your products, what are the key export markets, and for which products and end-use applications (rPET, rHDPE, rPP, Packaging grades)?
Guo: The application of recycled plastics in the packaging market is mainly driven by the demand from international brands. Large brands use environmentally friendly recycled products as a way to actively fulfill their social responsibility and promote the recycling and utilization of waste plastics through their actions. In the Chinese market, international brands have been testing and trialing small batches of recycled plastics over the past two years. In the Southeast Asia, Hong Kong and Macau markets, they have begun to introduce recycled plastic packaging products. Many international brands also have production sites in China, and their export products have started to use recycled plastics. In the personal care sector, they primarily use rHDPE and rPP, while in food packaging, rPET is the main material, all of which must meet food-grade requirements and obtain FDA or EFSA certification.
Most participants are focusing on food contact recycled materials, but China currently does not allow recyclates to be used in food-contact applications. In such a situation, how should Chinese recyclers develop their business? Would pyrolysis be an appropriate approach for Chinese recyclers to look towards?
Wang: Currently, the main applications for high-value products from Chinese PET recycling enterprises are textile fibers, industrial yarns, and other non-food grade uses. Food-grade rPET products can also meet specific needs in personal care products, and other food-grade rPET supplies include exports to Hong Kong and overseas markets.
Pyrolysis is still in the exploratory stage in China, and several commercial projects have been announced this year, but their operation will take some time and still requires market validation. On August 27-28 this year, we will have an International Rigid Polyolefin Recycling Summit in Shanghai, which will include topics related to chemical recycling and pyrolysis. Those who are interested are welcome to follow and participate.
The EU is mulling a “mirror-clause” in the Single Use Plastics Directive which would mean that recyclers from outside the EU that are sending material to the EU to count towards our recycled content targets will be held to the same feedstock, process and environmental targets as European recyclers. How do you expect this to develop and do you see any impact on your business?
Guo: [Complying with EU standards] is not difficult for Guolong Recycled Plastics, because the process technology, production equipment and environmental standards of Guolong are the same as those in Europe, as is the the use of PCR materials.
Over the past few years, Guolong have passed various tests, factory inspections, and production environment assessments required by more than twenty international brand companies, and safely met their requirements. But, if the EU pushes this policy, it might implement certification permits through factory inspections under a case-by-case basis, which might impose certain restrictions on many other recycling enterprises in China.
What is Guolong's future development target, and does Guolong plan to invest in chemical recycling in the near future?
Guo: After ten years of development, Guolong has now established sizeable capacity for producing recyclates for a range of different end-uses (see table). We have successfully implemented a business model that spans the entire industrial chain, encompassing both food-grade and industrial-grade products. Currently the company has no concrete expansion plans for the future.
| Recycling type | Capacity (t/yr) |
| Food-grade rPET | 60,000 |
| Food-grade rHDPE | 20,000 |
| Food-grade rPP | 20,000 |
| Pipe grade recyclates | 80,000 |
| Industrial grade rHDPE | 20,000 |
Do you expect to see a market start to develop for recyclates into the food packaging market in China in the near future (i.e. a change of regulation) and what other regulatory changes in China do you expect that could support the recycling industry?
Wang: China is currently researching the safety of using recycled materials in packaging applications, which includes not only recycled plastics but also recycled metals, such as whether recycled aluminum can be used for cans. The local market is also awaiting the issuance of relevant documents.
Presently, the government has introduced various policies such as the "trade-in" policy and the reverse invoicing policy, which have all promoted the expansion of the recycling industry. These allow recyclers to issue invoices to their waste suppliers (rather than the other way around), to enable recyclers to claim a VAT deduction even when the waste seller they are working with is too small to issue invoices. Government policy may also be directed towards waste classification in the future, this could be the direction for future government policy.
Of course, establishing a complete recycling system requires more implementation strategies and more time to explore development paths and undertake construction.
Spotlight content
Related news
Borouge, partners to develop Indonesian waste ecosystem
Borouge, partners to develop Indonesian waste ecosystem
Singapore, 11 February (Argus) — Abu Dhabi-listed polyolefins producer Borouge and Austrian firm Borealis have partnered with Indonesian plastic recyclers Pelita Mekar Semesta (PMS) and Reciki Solusi Indonesia to develop Indonesia's first fully integrated circular waste management ecosystem in East Java. They will launch a feasibility study to assess plans for a greenfield facility that converts post-consumer plastic waste into high-quality recycled polyolefins, strengthening domestic availability of recycled polymers, Borouge said on 10 February. The project aims to provide consistent feedstock supply for mechanically recycled polyolefins by using plastic waste. Meanwhile, the Indonesian recyclers will support the project through plastic waste collection and sorting, which are key steps in producing consistent recycled polymer grades suitable for downstream markets. The initiative supports Borouge's aim to raise recycled content across regional markets, the company said. The move is part of Borealis' efforts to raise its circular polyolefin capacity and reducing plastic waste, the Austrian firm added. The feasibility study marks the beginning of a longer term effort to build a more sustainable plastics value chain in Indonesia, Borouge said. By Sihan Long Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU passes SUPD implementation update
EU passes SUPD implementation update
London, 6 February (Argus) — EU member states voted today in favour of an update to the implementing decision under the Single Use Plastics Directive, including rules for attributing chemically recycled content, Louhane Jacob, a project manager at the French economy and finance ministry, said at the Petcore Europe conference. Member states voted by majority in favour of the rules. The draft decision clarifies mass balance rules and the inclusion of chemical recycling, and establishes rules for fuel-exempt mass balance, with no reports yet of significant changes compared with the leaked draft that circulated in early January . The final text has not yet been published. Minor changes are expected to affect how imported recyclates can count towards recycled content targets. The rules in the leaked draft stated that recycled PET (rPET) produced outside the EU market cannot count towards the 25pc recycled content for PET beverage bottles until after 21 November 2027, when imports from OECD countries will be allowed. Sources indicate that the text voted on today clarifies that all steps of the recycling chain are to take place within the EU until this date. The European Commission will adopt implementing measures without significant delay, and the implementing act will enter into force 20 days after its publication in the EU's Official Journal. The response from market participants was mixed. Some support the exclusion of imports from counting towards recycled content targets, hoping this will stabilise and secure the European PET recycling market over the next couple of years, protecting the market from cheaper import volumes from countries with lower collection and fixed costs. Others want a level playing field for EU and non-EU recyclers, with fair competition and access to affordable, high-quality and compliant recycled materials to achieve sustainability targets. The decision's impact may be limited because reporting requirements are on EU member states and not companies, some participants said. "We are happy, because it is a step needed to maintain circularity in Europe. If this was not approved there would be nothing supporting Europe. Some members and brand owners are not happy but Europe needs a reality check with what is competitiveness. The cost of collection in Europe is so high. There are some countries (outside the EU) that are collecting waste at the cost 10 times lower than the EU. We need to give some time, not forever, for the industry to get balanced," Petcore Europe president Antonello Ciotti said. The rules will help secure the chemical recycling market in Europe and may stimulate further investment and progress on projects because they are a move towards chemically recycled material counting towards recycled content targets, some market participants said. "Today is a major step forward for circular plastics because it puts in a clear harmonised mass balance approach for recycled content... this clarity in rules will support investments and further capacity in Europe", Chemical Recycling Europe chairman Valentijn De Neve said. "The European preference also shows a strong signal that there is support to make this a European competitive market and we look forward to the next steps to use this framework also for the Packaging and Packaging Waste regulation (PPWR)", he said. Rules for allocating chemically-recycled content by mass balance for the more wide-ranging recycled content requirements in PPWR — due to come into force in 2030 — will need to be confirmed independently. But many in the industry expect those agreed under the SUPD to act as a precedent in the decision process. But non-governmental organisation Zero Waste Europe (ZWE) was much less supportive. "If the main points remain the same, including the same allocation rules with a fuel-use exemption model, we would not be able to support the text," said Lauriane Veillard, ZWE policy expert on chemicals recycling and plastic-to-fuels. By Chloe Kinner, Will Collins and Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Asian, Finnish firms start Sony bioplastic supply chain
Asian, Finnish firms start Sony bioplastic supply chain
Tokyo, 6 February (Argus) — Asian and Finnish companies in chemicals, refining and trading have created a bioplastic supply chain for Japanese electronics maker Sony to cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in electronics production. In the supply chain, Finnish biofuels producer Neste will supply bionaphtha to four petrochemical companies, the companies said on 6 February. The supply chain of multiple companies works like this: Japanese refiner Eneos and South Korean chemicals firm SK Geo Centric will process the bionaphtha supplied by Neste at their crackers to produce bio-paraxylene (bio-PX); this bio-PX will be used by South Korea's Hanwha Impact to make renewable terephthalic acid; that is then converted to renewable polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) resin and films by Japanese firm Toray's South Korean subsidiary Toray Advanced Materials Korea. Eneos has already started supplying the bio-paraxylene produced at its Mizushima refinery in western Japan, the company said. Other companies involved in the supply chain are Japanese refiner Idemitsu which uses bionaphtha at its cracker to produce renewable styrene monomer, which Taiwan's Formosa Chemicals and Fibre (FCFC) converts to renewable polystyrene resin. Another Japanese chemicals firm, Mitsui Chemicals, also uses Neste's bionaphtha to produce bisphenol-A. Japan's Adeka also uses a bio-derived feedstock to make flame retardants, while Chinese firm Qingdao Haier New Material Development produces polycarbonate or acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) resin. Taiwan-based Chimei also supplies renewable polycarbonate resin. All these biochemical materials will be processed by plastics molding companies for Sony's new products. Using a mass balance approach, biomass-based attributes will be allocated to the products across the supply chain. Japanese trading house Mitsubishi will coordinate the entire chain and manage the delivery of environmental credits. The total volume of bio-naphtha needed for the chain was not disclosed. Using Neste's bionaphtha typically reduces GHG emissions by around 85pc compared with using only conventional fossil-derived naphtha, Mitsubishi said. Sony plans to roll out new audio-visual products made with these renewable plastics globally as it aims to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2040. Argus last assessed bionaphtha delivered to northeast Asia at $1,875/t cfr on 6 February, $1,270/t over Japanese fossil naphtha. The range of downstream bio-based products in development continues to expand, but high prices for bionaphtha and downstream biochemicals continue to inhibit wider adoption and commercialisation, according to chemical producers in the region. By Kohei Yamamoto and Lauren Moffitt Supply chain partners Company Role Neste Production of bionaphtha Idemitsu Kosan Production of renewable styrene monomer Formosa Chemicals and Fibre Production of renewable polystyrene resin SK Geo Centric Production of renewable para-xylene Eneos Production of renewable para-xylene Hanwha Impact Production of renewable terephthalic acid Toray Advanced Materials Korea Production of renewable PET resin Mitsui Chemicals Production of renewable bisphenol-A CHIMEI Production of renewable polycarbonate (PC) resin ADEKA Production of renewable flame retardants Qingdao Haier New Material Development Production of renewable PC/ABS resin Sony Design and manufacturing of finished products Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Brazil flags sharp US PE dumping duties
Brazil flags sharp US PE dumping duties
Sao Paulo, 5 February (Argus) — Brazil has issued a recommendation that could nearly triple provisional anti-dumping duties on US polyethylene (PE) imports, effectively shutting out most shipments, according to a department of trade defense Decom report into US and Canadian exports. The report, issued on 2 February and seen by Argus , outlines the key findings of the investigation into PE imports under NCM codes 3901.10.30, 3901.20.29 and 3901.40.00. Decom — part of trade ministry Mdic — calculated a dumping margin of $734.32/metric tonne (t), equivalent to 79.3pc, for US exporters. The authority determined dumping margins for Canada of $264.99/t (26.9pc) for one producer-exporter and $232/t (26.3pc) for another. Dumped imports are causing material injury to Brazil's domestic resin industry, and a causal link exists between the injury and the imports under investigation, Decom said. Brazil currently enforces provisional anti-dumping duties of $199.04/t on US-origin PE and $238.49/t on Canadian-origin material. These provisional duties were imposed in August 2025 and remain in effect through 28 February as the investigation moves into its final phase. Interested parties have a 20-day window to file final comments following the report's publication. Once that period ends, Decom will prepare its final determination and forward it to foreign trade chamber, Camex. The Camex executive management committee (Gecex) is expected to make a final decision by 14 May, the legal deadline for concluding the probe. The outcome of the case is expected to have significant implications for regional PE trade flows. Market participants await Decom's final findings, which will determine whether the provisional duties are upheld, revised, or lifted entirely. Limited effect The provisional duties had a limited effect on Brazil's imports last year, as the US remained Brazil's top supplier even as it lost market share, official Comexstat data show. Brazil's PE import values totaled $1.61bn last year, a 1.7pc decrease from $1.63bn in 2024. Import volumes increased by 2.2pc to 1.46mn t in 2025 from 1.42mn t the prior year. The US was Brazil's main exporter, accounting for around 961,890t last year, with its share of total volume falling to 66pc from 71pc in 2024. Argentina was the second-largest exporter to Brazil, shipping nearly 218,380t last year and boosting its share to 15pc from 11pc. Saudi Arabia rose to third place with approximately 56,445t, representing 4pc of Brazil's total imports last year. Canada's deliveries fell by 40pc to 49,810t in 2025, with its share falling to 3.4pc from 6pc in 2024. Egypt dropped to fifth place with around 47,795t, accounting for 3.3pc of the total volume. By Fred Fernandes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.