• 24 July 2024
  • Market: Bitumen / Asphalt

Related news

News
05/10/26

US Supreme Court hears oil sector climate case

US Supreme Court hears oil sector climate case

Washington, 5 October (Argus) — The US Supreme Court's justices appeared split Monday during oral arguments over the fate of dozens of pending lawsuits seeking billions of dollars in damages from oil companies for allegedly contributing to climate-related damages. The case will decide if Boulder, Colorado, and other cities can continue pursuing lawsuits in state court against oil companies for wildfires, drought and other climate-related effects they attribute to the sale of gasoline and other fossil fuels. Canadian oil company Suncor, ExxonMobil and other oil companies named as defendants in Boulder's lawsuit say the passage of the Clean Air Act effectively preempted state lawsuits related to interstate air pollution. "If Boulder's claims are allowed to go forward, some 90,000 municipalities across the country will have the ability to make national and international energy policy by asking juries to impose catastrophic damages on selected fossil fuel producers," Suncor's attorney Kannon Shanmugam told the court on Monday. In 2011, the Supreme Court already ruled unanimously that fossil fuel companies could not be sued in federal court for climate damages because the Clean Air Act had already given the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the complex "balancing act" of regulating air pollution. But President Donald Trump's decision to disclaim authority over greenhouse gases under that law — an action being challenged in a separate lawsuit — has injected further uncertainty into the case. "It is difficult to decide whether the Clean Air Act preempts these claims when we don't know whether the Clean Air Act applies to greenhouse gas emissions," Boulder's attorney Kevin Russell said. The court's liberal justices appeared unconvinced that the state-level lawsuits could not move forward. The Supreme Court already allows nuisance claims in state court under the Clean Water Act, so "I don't see why we wouldn't permit it under the Clean Air Act either," justice Sonia Sotomayor said. Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative, said the court did not have to "reinvent the wheel" to decide the case because it already said multiple times that air pollution is a federal issue, not a state issue, unless Congress provides an exception. But other conservative justices wondered if that logic still applied. Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned how "nobody can sue at all" when the Trump administration has "disclaimed the power to regulate" greenhouse gases. Another conservative justice, Amy Coney Barrett, appeared skeptical of a claim by Shanmugam, on behalf of Suncor, that "regardless of what EPA says" about its greenhouse gas authority under the Clean Air Act, state courts would be unable to address interstate air pollution under the structure of the US Constitution. "I think that's a little slippery," Barrett responded. Supreme Court justice Samuel Alito recused himself from the case, meaning one conservative justice would need to join the court's three liberals justices to create a 4-4 split. If that occurs, a lower court ruling allowing the Boulder case to move forward would remain intact, while other court rulings blocking state-level damages lawsuits against oil companies would remain in place. Colorado's courts have yet to decide on the merits of the Boulder lawsuit. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Find out more
News

Houthis claim Saudi airspace unsafe: Update


05/10/26
News
05/10/26

Houthis claim Saudi airspace unsafe: Update

Updates with details throughout London, 5 October (Argus) — Yemen's Houthis on Monday threatened to target all civilian flights using Saudi Arabia's airspace, after the militant group appeared to be losing ground in the latest bout of fighting of the country's civil war. In a social media post the Houthi military headquarters claimed that it carried out an attack on the King Khalid airport in Riyadh and other civilian airports in Saudi Arabia and that, further, it attacked Saudi Aramco's Rabigh refinery on the Red Sea coast. There has been no independent confirmation of those claims. The warning follows a large-scale offensive against the Houthis by Yemen's internationally recognised and Saudi-backed government, which said it had made some gains against the Houthis. The Houthi militants warned "all international airlines using Saudi airspace to cease their flights, as it has become an operations zone for our forces." But Saudi airspace remains open and commercial flights continue to operate as of 20:30 GMT on Monday, according to Flightradar24.com flight-tracking data. Saudi aviation regulator GACA and air navigation provider Sans have announced no operating restrictions. But the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) last week advised airlines to avoid parts of the Jeddah flight information region in Saudi Arabia because of escalating Houthi missile and drone attacks. Jeddah airport remains open. The US Embassy in Riyadh issued an updated travel advisory on Monday, advising of "the potential for aerial drone or missile attacks on Saudi Arabia". President Donald Trump's administration so far has declined to announce provision of air defense and other military support for Riyadh, despite the Houthis' attacks on the Saudi energy infrastructure. "It'll all work out very well," Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday, about the Saudi-backed offensive against the Houthis. "The US has a defense and security agreement with Saudi Arabia and we intend to live by it," secretary of state Marco Rubio said at a briefing in Washington on Monday, but he added that "I won't discuss details further than that". But Turkey and Pakistan, which signed an informal defense alliance with Saudi Arabia last month, indicated on Monday that they may provide military support for Riyadh. A joint statement by the three countries on Monday pledged to "move immediately" to take "the necessary measures to provide the agreed military forces and resources and ensure their rapid deployment in the Kingdom". By Andrey Telegin and Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Germany weighs maritime GHG loophole closure


05/10/26
News
05/10/26

Germany weighs maritime GHG loophole closure

Hamburg, 5 October (Argus) — The German ministry for the environment, climate action, nature conservation and nuclear safety (BMUKN) is examining various options for closing the so-called maritime loophole. The market has already reacted, with German renewable fuel tickets generated through the maritime loophole now being priced at wider discounts, reflecting increased concerns over potential invalidation. The ministry confirmed to Argus that it is assessing relevant options. No draft proposal currently exists, nor is there a timetable for a possible amendment. The ministry also pointed out that the federal government is already empowered to exclude renewable energy carriers used outside land-based transport from counting towards the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Quota (GHG quota). This authority was introduced through the Second Act on the Further Development of GHG quota. The legislator justified the measure on the grounds that "negative effects on the GHG quota market" should be prevented where they arise "from the use of renewable energy products outside land-based transport — for example in maritime transport". The existing regulation gap allows renewable fuel tickets to be generated for road fuels that are ultimately used in maritime transport. Under article 52 of Germany's energy tax law (EnergieStG), the volumes are initially taxed voluntarily as road transport fuel, making them eligible for compliance under the GHG quota system pursuant to the Federal Immission Control Act. The energy tax paid can subsequently be reclaimed once the fuel has been used in the maritime sector, while the generated renewable fuel tickets remain valid. Market participants said the regulation gap can be used with various biofuels, although advanced B100 biodiesel and bio-LNG are currently the most relevant. According to market participants, the regulation gap is being utilised by established companies in the fuel sector and by specialist firms whose business model is based on the marketing of such renewable fuel tickets. Market participants said the prospect of regulatory changes is already affecting the valuation of the corresponding renewable fuel tickets. Renewable fuel tickets for the category Other current compliance year that were generated through this mechanism are now being traded at discounts of around €40/tCO2e. Previously, discounts had been around €20/tCO2e. Market participants attributed the widening discount to recent discussions about a possible closure of the regulation gap by the BMUKN and resulting concerns over the potential invalidation of affected volumes. At the same time, several market participants considered the retrospective invalidation of previously transferred or already submitted renewable fuel tickets unlikely. Instead, uncertainty relates primarily to the future eligibility of such volumes should the regulation gap be closed. Some buyers have also introduced contractual provisions, excluding the transfer of renewable fuel tickets generated through the loophole to avoid potential regulatory risks. By Ricco Schalamon and Marcel Rothenstein Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

US diesel stocks low as export control threat wanes


05/10/26
News
05/10/26

US diesel stocks low as export control threat wanes

Houston, 5 October (Argus) — The waning threat of a ban on US diesel exports offers little relief for a US distillate complex facing peak heating demand just as domestic inventories slump to historical lows and global supplies tighten. US president Donald Trump on 30 September tempered his endorsement of a diesel export ban because of concerns that it could push up gasoline prices, as his administration raised expectations of price relief from new diesel supplies in Europe. Trump said he was still "thinking about" an export ban, but believes the US is in a "good place" because of a recent drop in crude prices and a "tremendous" amount of oil coming out of the strait of Hormuz. US energy secretary Chris Wright expects diesel prices to "move meaningfully down in the coming weeks and days", in part because of additional supplies from Europe. "You will hear announcements from our friends in Europe about new diesel supplies that'll come to the market that'll meaningfully push diesel prices down," Wright says. The G7 announced a 100mn bl oil stocks release on 2 October, to begin immediately. Market participants are closely watching Trump's evolving comments on the possible ban. Such a measure could help rebuild low domestic distillate inventories and improve supply security during the harvesting season and ahead of winter. But limiting exports could weigh on Nymex ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD) futures, reduce arbitrage opportunities and pressure refinery margins, potentially diminishing refiners' incentives to maximise distillate production. Trump's latest comments come as supply tightens even further in the US northeast ahead of the peak heating season, in part because of refinery maintenance that started in September and will continue until mid-November at Irving Oil's 320,000 b/d St John refinery in New Brunswick, Canada, one of the largest sources of imported diesel for the region. Ultra-low sulphur distillate inventories in the New York region were the lowest in more than four years at 8.9mn bl in the week to 25 September, more than 37pc below a year earlier. This has boosted demand for deliveries to the region. Gulf coast diesel is moving to the northeast along the Colonial Pipeline as well as arriving by sea, tightening tanker availability, increasing demand for pipeline space and raising transport costs. The arbitrage from the Gulf coast to New York Harbor hit its widest in nearly four years on 29 September, as the Gulf coast ULSD premium to Linden, New Jersey, along the Colonial Pipeline rose to 34.81¢/USG, its highest since November 2022 (see graph). Cracking spreads Some support could come from refinery economics that continue to favour diesel over jet fuel. The Nymex ULSD 1:1 crack spread against WTI crude averaged $105.57/bl over 16-30 September after hitting a historical high of $117.92/bl on 16 September. The US jet fuel crack spread averaged $91.07/bl over the same timeframe (see graph). The stronger diesel margin will probably prompt refiners capable of shifting yields towards distillate production to continue prioritising ULSD over jet fuel during the autumn. Gulf coast diesel prices rose on strong demand and low inventories. ULSD inventories in the region dropped to 35.9mn bl in the week to 25 September, down by 1.4mn bl compared with a year earlier. The region has become a key alternative supplier in the face of lower exports from the Mideast Gulf and Russia. The region's diesel exports surged by 41pc to 1.41mn b/d in September from a year earlier and were the highest for any September since at least 2016, according to oil analytics firm Vortexa. By Eunice Bridges and Craig Ross US crack spreads Colonial Pipeline ULSD arbitrage Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Global inventories 'scarily thin': Aramco CEO


05/10/26
News
05/10/26

Global inventories 'scarily thin': Aramco CEO

London, 5 October (Argus) — Global oil inventories are "scarily thin" after seven months of production and shipping disruptions caused by the US-Iran war, Saudi state-controlled Aramco's chief executive Amin Nasser said today. "The most serious energy supply shock in my career" has left the global oil supply system straining, Nasser said at the Energy Intelligence Forum in London. "The supply resilience cushion is scarily thin," he said, putting the global oil stock draw at 3bn bl since the start of the war. Replenishing inventories while meeting demand could take up to two years, Nasser said, longer than the 18 months he forecast in early August. He said a co-ordinated release of oil from inventories "was the last major tool in the box". The G7 last week said it would co-ordinate a release of 100mn bl from oil stocks over the next four months, including a substantial diesel release within 20 days. This appears to be part of a 400mn bl commitment made in March. "Emergency reserves might buy us a winter," Nasser said today. "They cannot fix long-term supply." He said a full reopening of the strait of Hormuz is essential to relieve the pressure. But the US and Iran have not reached any sort of agreement that would allow this. Tehran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has resumed attacks on tankers in the strait of Hormuz and today instructed a tanker transiting the waterway inbound to turn back or be targeted, according to UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO). By Ben Winkley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.