Climate policy and UN Cop meetings
Overview
Argus provides key insights on how global climate policies will affect the global energy and commodity markets. We shine a light on decisions made at UN Cop meetings, which have far-reaching effects on the markets we serve. Progress at Cop 30 in Brazil will be crucial in transforming ambitions into actions aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Countries must produce new climate plans this year.
Follow the key developments in energy transition field with our Net zero page and keep up to date with ongoing coverage of these issues by following Argus Media on LinkedIn and on X.
News
UK must speed electrification to hit climate goals: CCC
UK must speed electrification to hit climate goals: CCC
London, 24 June (Argus) — The "slow pace of electrification is putting the UK's climate targets at risk", the UK parliamentary advisory Climate Change Committee (CCC) said today, in its annual progress report, which assesses government progress in reducing emissions. The CCC noted "good progress in a range of areas", including contracting a record amount of new renewable energy in the latest auction, and on electric vehicles (EVs). Nearly one in four new car sales is now electric, the CCC said. Moving faster to electrify the UK could be "an opportunity to enhance UK energy security in the face of rising threats", as well as hitting climate goals, the committee said. Reliance on fossil fuels for transport and gas boilers for domestic heating leaves the UK "exposed to geopolitical shocks", it added. Of the UK's emissions, 93pc are now outside the electricity supply sector, the report noted. Surface transport is the highest-emitting sector. The government should prioritise a "more rapid transition to EVs" and speed up heat pump installations, the CCC said. A "typical UK household will see lower and less volatile bills" by switching to an EV and heat pump from fossil-fuelled alternatives, it said. The net cost for the UK to reach net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050 is lower than "a single fossil fuel price shock", the committee found in March. The government should take "further action to reduce the cost of electricity", and ensure faster industrial electrification, including by speeding grid connections, the report found. The committee found that progress in the agriculture, land use and aviation sectors "has also been too slow". UK GHG emissions were 407mn t/CO2 equivalent (t/CO2e) in 2025, down by 1.8pc or 7.3mn t/CO2e, compared with 2024, provisional estimates show. The UK is on track to meet its fourth and fifth carbon budgets — which cover 2023-27 and 2028-32, respectively — the CCC said. Carbon budgets, which are legally binding in the UK, cap the total GHG emissions that the UK can emit over five-year periods. The UK met its first three carbon budgets, largely through decarbonising the power sector and shutting down coal-fired power generation. The country has a legally-binding target to reach net zero GHG emissions by 2050. But the UK is not on track to achieve its national climate plan — known as a nationally determined contribution (NDC) under the UN climate process — for 2030, the CCC found. It flagged "a significant gap" between government plans and the UK's 2030 NDC commitment to reduce GHG emissions by at least 68pc compared with 1990 levels. "Credible plans" and plans with "some risks attached" exist for 44pc and 15pc, respectively, of the required GHG reductions to reach the NDC target, the CCC said. For the rest, "significant risks" are attached for 19pc of required cuts, and 4pc have "insufficient plans" in place. The remaining 17pc of emissions reductions required are not covered, the committee said. The UK must reduce its GHG emissions to 291mn t/CO2e by 2030 to meet its NDC. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EU methane rules need swift amendment: export countries
EU methane rules need swift amendment: export countries
London, 24 June (Argus) — Gas-exporting countries have urged the EU "to take swift, necessary actions to clarify and to adopt targeted amendments to the EU methane regulation" (EUMR), they said in an open letter to leaders of the EU and member states. Before any amendments are passed, "a stop-the-clock mechanism" should be introduced to allow time to develop necessary methodologies and ensure compliance, along with the grandfathering of new contracts signed while legislative adjustments are under way and the removal of penalties for non-compliance during this transitional period, ministers of energy from exporting countries — among them the US and Qatar, Argus understands — said. The letter was addressed to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, European Council president Antonio Costa and leaders of EU member states. Under the EUMR, importers must from 1 January 2027 demonstrate that they meet the bloc's monitoring, reporting and verification standards and from 2028, importers must submit methane intensity reports. By 2030, importers will be required to meet the EU methane intensity requirement. "Relying on discretionary non-enforcement across all 27 EU member states fails to address the financial and legal risks" firms face, the letter said. Exporters and importers are unwilling to enter into contractual agreements that knowingly violate EU law, notwithstanding recommendations, the letter continued. This comes in reaction to the expected non-binding recommendation from the commission that EU member states should not apply penalties for importer infringements in 2027-29. The commission has so far ruled out reviewing the regulation agreed in 2024. The intention is to "solidify" the EUMR rather than reopen it, EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra told Argus today. "The stance of the commission has been that the regulation is there for a clear reason," Hoekstra said, adding that he is "more than happy" to continue diplomatic efforts. The ministers of exporting countries also encouraged a pragmatic approach to clarifying missing elements of the EUMR and adopting changes needed to enable effective implementation while reducing untenable risks. A representative of the US Department of Energy already called for revisions last month , saying that the EU methane rules were "impossible to meet". Market participants across LNG supply chains and importing groups have also expressed concern about the EU methane guidelines and their impact, calling for the regulation to be paused . By Lucas Waelbroeck Boix Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Indonesia to issue 30mn t REDD+ credits in July: Update
Indonesia to issue 30mn t REDD+ credits in July: Update
Adds details on launch of Indonesia's carbon registry and remarks by UK's special representative for climate London, 24 June (Argus) — The Indonesian government will issue more than 30mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) of forestry carbon credits on 6 July, forestry minister Raja Juli Antoni said at the Net Zero Delivery Summit 2026 today as part of London Climate Action Week. "I will issue a ministerial approval and facilitate the issuance of forestry carbon credits exceeding 30mn t CO2e," the minister said, adding that this represented one of the "most significant milestones" in the development of the country's forest carbon markets. The issuance has been long-awaited from the market, as forestry projects located in Indonesia stopped issuing credits following a government ban in 2022, which was removed late last year. This is likely to weigh on prices for Indonesian carbon credits generated form forestry projects in the country. Prices for credits generated in 2020 from the Verra-listed Katingan Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) project have fallen from record highs reached in early March, in anticipation of the bulk issuance. Indonesia will officially launch its national carbon unit registry, SRUK, on 9 July, the minister said. "Our objective is simple — to create an ecosystem where climate ambition can be matched by investor confidence." The future of carbon markets "will not be determined solely by the volume of credit", but rather by the level of trust these give to investment, mobilisation and the climate and development outcomes that they deliver, he said. The minister called for strengthening integrity and transparency to allow confidence in carbon credit markets to grow, further developing market infrastructure; liquidity mechanisms and risk-sharing instruments and ensuring that delivered carbon finance benefits on the ground, "particularly for indigenous people or local communities and those who safeguard forests and natural ecosystems". Indonesia expects its CO2 emissions to peak in 2030 and aims to achieve net zero by 2060 "or sooner". 'Make it work' Governments and private investors need to "roll up their sleeves" and make carbon markets work, UK special representative for climate Rachel Kyte said at the summit. "We are in overtime… And I have to tell you that the mood has changed," she said, adding that while governments keep working on making market infrastructure more robust, the message from the private sector is also "less whiny than it used to be", being more pragmatic to solve issues where the carbon market stumbles. She also stressed the importance of interoperability between permit and carbon credit markets, which is particularly important for emerging markets and developing economies that are trying to build a carbon market framework. "The UK can announce that we are joining the Open Coalition for the Interoperability of Compliance Markets" in addition to the intergovernmental Coalition to Grow Carbon Markets (CGCM), which the UK established with Kenya and Singapore last year, Kyte said, adding that it was crucial to think how compliance, international markets — such as activity under Article 6 of the Paris agreement — and voluntary carbon markets interoperate. "Increasingly the pragmatism [for developing economies] is that, if I've got a high integrity credit that I can generate from my mangroves, my seagrasses, my forests, my retired coal plant or whatever it is, then I should be able to set up a framework whereby that credit can be used in the voluntary markets, under Article 6 or in the compliance markets," she said. In November, the CGCM will publish a playbook which advises governments on the policy instruments they can use to generate the greatest impact in supporting private sector action into carbon markets. By Erisa Senerdem Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Stegra closes €1.4bn funding for low-carbon steel plant
Stegra closes €1.4bn funding for low-carbon steel plant
New Delhi, 24 June (Argus) — Sweden's Stegra has closed a €1.4bn ($1.6bn) financing round to fund construction of its low-carbon steel plant in Boden, Sweden, it said today. This completes a funding package that was announced in principle in April. The funding was led by a consortium headed by Wallenberg Investments and included Singapore's Temasek, Sweden's Bolero and SEB-Stiftelsen, as well as IMAS. Existing shareholders private equity firm Altor, hydrogen-focused investment manager Hy24 and climate investment platform Just Climate also took part. A group of its second-lien lenders, led by AIP Management, joined the round as equity investors, Stegra said. The company has also received approval from its lenders to maintain access to debt facilities put in place under its 2024 financing package. The additional capital strengthens Stegra's financial position as it continues construction of its steel plant in Boden, Sweden, it said. But the project timeline is "under review", Stegra said. The firm previously said that it was targeting to start operations in 2027. The plant is set to produce 2.5mn t/yr of low-carbon steel in its first phase, potentially doubling that output later on. The first phase will use over 700MW of electrolysis capacity, provided by German technology firm Thyssenkrupp Nucera. By Anmol Choubey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Analysis
Mideast war renews focus on energy security, transition
Mideast war renews focus on energy security, transition
Houston, 25 March (Argus) — The depth of the war-driven Mideast Gulf oil and gas disruption and its undetermined length has prompted renewed discussion of energy security and transition in the industry, but familiar challenges remain. The argument in favor of fossil fuels has been "that they're portable and storable," investment firm Carlyle's chief strategy officer of energy pathways Jeff Currie said at CERAWeek by S&P Global on Tuesday. "That also makes them incredibly dangerous, as we're witnessing right now in the strait of Hormuz." "One of the biggest predictions you can make out of what's currently happening is (that) it's going to turbo charge the energy transition into any fuel you want to be local, distributed and not vulnerable to other parts of the world," Currie said. Lessons from the ongoing crisis may also apply to legacy energy systems, BP chief economist Gareth Ramsay said. "We have built a wonderful oil market, which is ... incredibly efficient, but efficiency is sometimes also fragility," Ramsay said. "Will countries now ask again, 'do we need our own refining capacity? Do we need to keep our refineries online now, even if they're uneconomic, even if they're costly?'" Bigger than the '70s The magnitude of the current crisis appears to be greater than even the 1973 Arab oil embargo, which has prompted a decades-long shift in energy policies globally, Ramsay said. "There is no potential for immediate supply response," he said. Even limited attacks by Yemen's Houthis on commercial shipping through the Red sea in 2023-24 have cut flows through the Suez canal by around 50pc, Currie said. Applying the same metric to the Mideast Gulf "means you could lose between 5-10mn b/d... which will have a significant impact and be similar to the 1970s," he said. The magnitude of Mideast Gulf supply loss and price-driven demand destruction may be apparent but its duration is not, ConocoPhillips chief economist Helen Currie said. "Is this a short term drop in demand in response to higher prices and limited availability of supplies, and therefore that demand may come back by the fourth quarter or in the 2027?", she said. "It's that duration question that we're really grappling with." Long term impacts of the crisis could prompt OECD countries to significantly increase their minimum emergency oil inventory requirements, trading house Gunvor global head of research and analysis Frederic Lasserre said. The crisis also could prompt a renewed push toward energy transition, "particularly electrification", but policy decisions cannot be delayed, he said. "We have 25 years to get to 2050, and that's only one investment cycle. So we have to decide now what we do, because it's either refineries or nuclear power plants, not both." North America remains crude President Donald Trump's administration says it will stick to the course of prioritizing oil and gas development regardless of how the Mideast Gulf energy crisis evolves. Interior secretary Doug Burgum at the start of CERAWeek on 22 March touted an agreement with TotalEnergies to drop plans for offshore wind farms along the US east coast and invest in oil and natural gas production instead. The US, Canada and Mexico collectively account for 30pc of global oil output "... and we need to continue to grow that base here in North America, so that we're not as dependent on" the strait of Hormuz, industry group American Petroleum Institute president Mike Sommers said on Tuesday. Russia's war in Ukraine and the subsequent reorientation of Russian oil and gas flows in 2022 already prompted policymakers globally to try to square the issue of energy security, affordability and sustainability. The current crisis is likely to prompt similar discussions but outcomes once again are not guaranteed, Ramsay said. "To suffer a major energy supply shock once might be regarded as misfortune; to suffer a major energy shock twice begins to look like carelessness," he said, paraphrasing Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest . "This kind of shock, the second one in four years to energy supply, is going to have major implications for our retirement system, and it's going to have implications for the oil market," Ramsay said. "This is not going to go away (if) the conflict ends today." By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Adapting the global approach to climate change
Adapting the global approach to climate change
Washington's withdrawal sets back multilateral policy but economic impetus for cleaner energy remains, writes Georgia Gratton London, 30 January (Argus) — The world's approach to "climate multilateralism" must evolve in response to "geopolitical tensions", Brazilian diplomat and president of the UN Cop 30 climate summit Andre Correa do Lago said this week. Correa do Lago remains Cop president until he formally hands over the title in November to Turkish climate minister Murat Kurum at Cop 31. Cop 30 "shed light on the limitations of climate multilateralism and of formal consensus decision-making", Correa do Lago said, and "to keep pace with global warming, multilateralism must learn to operate at more than one institutional speed". He suggests a "two-tier" approach. The first tier should be based on the key tenet of climate talks such as Cops — consensus — while the second should focus on implementation, including through "coalitions of the willing", he said. Almost every country in the world is signed up to UN climate bodies the UNFCCC and IPCC, and the Paris climate accord. His call came in the same week that the US' second exit from the Paris agreement took effect, while President Donald Trump has also said the country will leave the UNFCCC and IPCC . But this would not preclude US businesses, states and cities from acting on climate change, the Brazilian Cop 30 presidency suggested this week. "We will be able to work with the other entities in the US," Cop 30 chief executive Ana Toni said. And Correa do Lago's vision echoed views from business leaders and governments that were put forward at the World Economic Forum (WEF) earlier this month in Davos, Switzerland. Most acknowledged a recent slowdown in effective climate policy, centred on the US volte-face, although the majority were sanguine on the "implementation" aspect — the progress of the global energy transition. India's new and renewable energy minister, Pralhad Venkatesh Joshi, cited "the unstoppable march of renewables". Chinese vice-premier He Lifeng pointed out that his nation "has put in place the world's largest renewable energy system", and firmly reiterated China's support for climate action. "I see a climate policy recession, but not a recession in the energy transition," former US vice-president Al Gore said in Davos. "The advantages of renewable energy have become so obvious everywhere around the world," he added. Shutting out the noise Danish biotechnology company Novonesis chief executive Ester Baiget spoke in Davos about "decoupling noise from facts" — looking past a rhetoric that rails against climate change action and instead at data showing that a global energy transition is well under way. Global renewable power capacity additions grew by 22pc to almost 685GW in 2024 — a record high for both additions and installed capacity — energy watchdog the IEA said in October . Renewable power capacity is forecast to grow by 4.6TW by 2030 — double the deployment in 2019-24 — driven by solar installations, the agency found. Much of the transition is being driven by plummeting costs for renewables. "We are so far down the road that the economics have taken over… the cost of a lot of the technologies has come down so much that it is simply economic sense to keep investing," director of clean power at the UK's energy ministry, Ben Golding, told UK lawmakers this month. Future costs are another factor, Davos speakers agreed. "I'm absolutely convinced that it will cost to be an emitter," either through taxes, purchasing emissions certificates or "paying for the cost of climate change", Swedish utility Vattenfall's chief executive, Anna Borg, said. Keeping focus further ahead is key, Cop 30 chief executive Toni said this week. "We know elections are short term, climate change will unfortunately be with us long term." Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EV flip-flopping has hampered the west: WEF
EV flip-flopping has hampered the west: WEF
London, 21 January (Argus) — Inconsistent policies and political turmoil have hampered western progress on electric vehicles (EVs), while China's longer-term stable approach has benefited industry winners such as BYD, speakers at a World Economic Forum (WEF) panel in Davos, Switzerland, said on Tuesday. China's lead in EVs is less about a single technological breakthrough and more about policy consistency. That was the clear message from executives and policymakers at the WEF panel on the global EV race, where China's long-term industrial alignment was repeatedly contrasted with stop-start policymaking in the US and Europe. Speaking early in the discussion, BYD executive vice-president Stella Li said China's EV successes "start from the government policy", arguing that Beijing's approach has been defined by consistency rather than constant revision. "In the past 20 years they never changed, but some countries went back and forth, and this will confuse manufacturing," Li said. "Once the government gives a very clear line, then manufacturing goes to work on the competition." This clarity, she argued, allowed companies to commit capital, concentrate on research and development and scale production without hedging against political reversals, something she suggested remains a structural disadvantage for western automakers. Industrial reality versus political instability Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, whose state accounts for more than a fifth of US car production, echoed this assessment from a US perspective, saying policy uncertainty has slowed decision-making across the industry. "The back and forth policies at the national level have made it more difficult for industry to throw all in," Whitmer said, adding that long-term investments were increasingly being delayed. "Chaos is really bad for business." The result, she added, is that manufacturers are forced to pursue multiple drivetrain strategies simultaneously, rather than committing fully to electrification. Former General Motors chief economist Elaine Buckberg said that a disconnect between political timeframes and industrial reality is critical. Automakers, she noted, plan vehicles years in advance, while democracy can change government policy over smaller time periods. "The typical planning process is five years before a vehicle comes into market, and you're planning to keep it there for six years," Buckberg said. "Keeping those incentives stable is really powerful." Alternatively, shifting incentives and short-term subsidies can distort demand. Li warned that poorly designed support schemes risk delaying purchases altogether. "Sometimes subsidies are more like a drug," she said. "Consumers just wait and the market stops. That is not sustainable." As competition between the US, China and Europe intensifies, the panel's message was that in the EV race, consistency may matter more than speed. By Thomas Kavanagh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Fossil fuels shift talks to continue outside Cop
Fossil fuels shift talks to continue outside Cop
Developed countries struggled to lead, and oil producers pushed back, but a roadmap may emerge away from Cop, write Caroline Varin and Georgia Gratton Edinburgh, 28 November (Argus) — The UN climate Cop 30 summit in Belem, Brazil, ended last week without an agreement to establish a roadmap on how to shift away from fossil fuels that some countries had hoped to see, but the discussion will not stop there. Just over 80 countries , including EU member states, the UK, Australia, countries in Latin America and Africa, and island states had pushed for the overarching Cop 30 text to address the transition away from fossil fuels, the largest contributor to climate change, but language on a roadmap did not make the final decision. Opposition from major oil-producing countries proved too strong to push the roadmap through, European ministers said. Parties instead agreed on the launch of a "global implementation accelerator (GIA)", and the "Belem Mission to 1.5". These voluntary initiatives are aimed at "enabling ambition and implementation" of countries' climate plans and at keeping the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C temperature rise limit within reach. This refers to the more ambitious goal of the Paris accord — to hold the global rise in temperature to less than 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and preferably to 1.5°C. "Although text addressing the response [to a lack of climate ambition] was watered down, there are hooks to build on within the GIA and the Belem Mission to 1.5°C," environmental think-tank E3G said. By the end of the summit, 119 countries — accounting for 74pc of global emissions — had submitted new commitments in nationally determined contributions (NDCs), non-profit group WRI noted. But these plans, if delivered, only account for 15pc of the emissions cut required by 2035 to limit the rise to 1.5°C. As a consolation prize, the Brazilian Cop 30 presidency pledged to deliver roadmaps on the transition away from fossil fuel and on halting and reversing deforestation. This echoed Cop 29's outcome, when a roadmap was promised, for scaling up climate finance to $1.3 trillion/yr by 2025 for developing countries that were left disappointed. The roadmaps "will be led by science and they will be inclusive", summit president Andre Correa do Lago said. Brazil holds the presidency until Cop 31 in Turkey next year. In the interim, the country plans to convene high-level talks with key international organisations, fossil fuel-producing and consuming countries, workers and civil society, do Lago said. He also noted that the presidency would "benefit from the first international conference for the phase-out of fossil fuels", to he held in Colombia in April. Having the roadmap in the Cop 30 text would have sent a much stronger signal, as "the main text is an obligation for all", EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said as the summit closed. But the presidency's work on a roadmap, high-level dialogues and the event in Colombia will create further milestones for climate discussions on the transition from fossil fuels, observers said. The presidency's roadmap could create momentum for the start of a plan on fossil fuels from willing countries, even though it sits outside official Cop negotiations. Fault lines The pushback from major oil and gas producers on cutting emissions by reducing fossil fuel use — evident at Cop 29 last year — grew firmer in Belem, and shows no sign of abating. The achievement at Cop 30 was not to renege on the Cop 28 consensus, French climate minister Monique Barbut said. Almost 200 countries pledged at Cop 28 in Dubai in 2023 to transition away from fossil fuels "in a just, orderly and equitable manner… so as to achieve net zero by 2050 in keeping with the science". The Cop 28 outcome also called for renewable energy capacity to triple and energy efficiency to double by 2030 and for "accelerating efforts towards the phase-down of unabated coal power". The main Cop 30 text does not mention the transition away from fossil fuels, and only makes two references to the Cop 28 deal — dubbed "the UAE consensus". Even pointing to the energy package within the Dubai deal agreed two years ago proved too much for some oil-producing countries. "The [UN climate body] UNFCCC's consensus-based process, as well as the lack of a concrete proposal to create the framework for developing countries to phase out fossil fuels, hindered the adoption of a roadmap in the Cop cover decision text," the Fossil Fuel Treaty Initiative said. The final day of Cop 30 — which ran more than 24 hours over time — saw decisions swiftly adopted. But Colombia spoke out against one, objecting that it included no language on the transition away from fossil fuels. "We are demanding the minimum necessary," Colombia's representative said, to "allow language already agreed under [Cop 28] consensus to be discussed here". Confounding the consensus Correa do Lago suspended the plenary while the Cop 30 presidency sought a solution. Decisions adopted at Cop summits cannot be revoked. But Correa do Lago said countries will be able to discuss issues in June next year in Bonn, Germany, at interim climate talks hosted annually by the UNFCCC. Colombia's intervention prompted pushback from Saudi Arabia and a furious response from Russia. The latter told countries objecting to "refrain from behaving like children". India's representative said reopening discussions would be "fundamentally unfair" and "inconsistent" with UNFCCC process. Russia, India and Saudi Arabia throughout the summit opposed the addition of wording on fossil fuels, according to Barbut. Saudi Arabia reiterated throughout Cop 30 that the focus should be on reducing emissions, not on specific fuels. And the climate-sceptic stance taken by US president Donald Trump's administration emboldened major oil-producing countries to stand their ground more firmly this year, many negotiators and observers said. Developed nations were not forceful, at least in the first week of the negotiations, in their support for a roadmap to shift away from fossil fuels. The EU called it a "difficult topic" and was caught in controversial domestic discussions on its own targets and environmental ambitions before heading to the summit, which may have weakened its claims to leadership. Australia, which will preside over Cop 31 negotiations in Turkey next year, at first could not see a space for discussing the roadmap in Belem. And even though over 80 countries had thrown their weight behind the topic by the midpoint of the summit, details on what it would look like were lacking. China, the world's largest greenhouse gas emitter, remained largely quiet on the topic outside negotiating rooms, redirecting attention towards renewable energy — a huge market for the country. Discussions on the transition away from fossil fuels were not expected to take centre stage at Cop , until Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called for this during the leaders' summit that preceded the talks. Leadership came from developing nations, notably Colombia. And there has been an eye-catching change at this Cop in how some developing countries are reframing rhetoric around fossil fuels and economic development. Some, including those with oil projects such as Kenya and Sierra Leone, are increasingly pushing for plans to shift away from fossil fuels — in a just, equitable and orderly manner — and highlight the importance of drastically increasing energy access through the transition. A Cop 30 decision addressing "the just energy transition" was broadly well-received. The text drew links between cutting emissions and ensuring climate resilience and positive economic development. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Country focus
No Results Found