Summer has brought record low R99 cash prices — and nearly 3.2mn bl of vessel-supplied renewable diesel — to key California distribution hubs, but those seeking to take long-term supply positions must grapple with changing incentive programs and yet unseen consequences for supply flows.
Looking ahead to the end of 2024, the future of RD supply is murky. Changing credit eligibility could discourage the volume of imports the west coast has grown accustomed to, domestic refining margins at the US Gulf coast have been indicated on the decline for much of the year, and a volatile underlying CARB diesel basis increases participants’ exposure to price risk.
Cash prices for R99 at the head of the pipeline (hop) in Los Angeles hit their lowest level in Argus series history on 6 August, when a downturn in the underlying CARB diesel basis pressured values to just $2.35/USG. The price slide, coupled with anecdotally unworkable spreads to local rack prices, weighed heavily on activity this summer, despite a steady stream of offshore shipments.
Deliveries via vessel to northern California in August were the second highest in Argus history at an estimated 741,000 bl — the latest in steady monthly increases since June — per data aggregated from bills of lading and global trade and analytics platform Kpler. Jones Act vessels from the US Gulf coast alone accounted for 448,000 bl, while shipments ex-Singapore constituted the remaining volume.
Southern California received an estimated 847,000 bl, almost evenly split between offshore suppliers and those at the US Gulf coast.
But the future of renewable diesel supply flows into California is mired with uncertainty surrounding incentives for both importers and domestic refiners. The BTC is set to expire with the 2024 calendar year, giving way to the IRA’s Clean Fuel Production Credit. The change would heavily favor US-based renewable diesel production and reduce awards for high-volume offshore imports to the US west coast, the latest pivot for an adolescent market that has struggled to achieve supply equilibrium.
Waterborne renewable diesel deliveries to California ports
.png?h=291&w=800&rev=0da4c0f74b6a4e30973246d5f32de530&hash=F868202B62F444876E6C39C2525BA625)
Neste — the leading offshore supplier of US R99 — is also slated to undergo turnarounds at both its Rotterdam, Netherlands, and Singapore facilities this quarter, followed by a second short-term Singapore turnaround in the fourth quarter. But the import lineup so far does not reflect a disruption in deliveries to the US this quarter.
At home, refining margins at the US Gulf coast are indicated on the upswing after narrowing through early August.
Renewable diesel deliveries to the west coast by rail from other US regions reached a record-high of nearly 2mn bl in May, per data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Shipments by vessel are also trending higher, with an estimated 864,000 bl delivered to California in August — the highest since November.
.png?h=447&w=750&rev=cf8cbeb0d7b247bf9fb16db85a818ad5&hash=9E60E62EFCDF0647829A9DBCE502BC76)
.png?h=397&w=750&rev=27de018dd5924e60b1c7a0f677ab538d&hash=940E4F9EB873083DA031B1F9D2EEA247)
Spot R99 markets in California were little tested at the end of August, although both the Los Angeles and San Francisco markets drew support from a controversial surprise proposal to limit California Low Carbon Fuel Standard credit generation for renewable diesel made from soybean or canola oils. The California Air Resources Board will also consider a one-time tightening of annual carbon reduction targets for gasoline and diesel by 9pc in 2025, compared with the usual 1.25pc annual reduction and a 5pc stepdown first proposed in December 2023, per a 12 August release.
But an unsteady economic landscape for domestic production remains a key decision-driver among US refiners.
Vertex Energy will begin reversing a renewable fuels hydrocracking unit back to conventional fuel feedstocks this quarter at its 88,000 b/d Mobile, Alabama, refinery. The company at the time cited headwinds in the renewable fuels market that it expects to persist through 2025.
Author: Jasmine Davis, Editor, Associate Editor – Oil Products
Spotlight content
Related news
European diesel market structure flips to contango
European diesel market structure flips to contango
London, 8 January (Argus) — The European diesel market has shifted into a contango structure for the first time in over a year, indicating that supply in the market is currently ample during a seasonally weak period for demand. Front-month Ice January gasoil futures fell to a 25¢/t discount to the second-month February futures by the market close today, falling from a 50¢/t premium the day before. The European diesel market was last in contango — where prompt prices are lower than forward prices — in October 2024. The backwardated structure in futures — where prompt prices are higher than forward prices — narrowed steadily from early December, after reaching a peak in mid-November. Strong supply has weighed on the value of front-month futures this year, particularly from high imports expected from the US, according to one European analyst. Around 450,000t of diesel and other gasoil departed the US for Europe in the week to 2 January, and a further 525,000t has departed since then, according to Vortexa. Both volumes were the highest on the route since June last year. About 1.86mn t unloaded in the EU and UK from the Middle East in December, a seven-month high. The well-supplied market has come at a seasonally low period for regional diesel demand — January and February are normally the weakest months for European road fuel demand. January futures expire on 12 January, which may have also driven the front-month value down, according to a European trader. Traders closing their long positions in January futures before expiry would weigh on prices. The second-month and third-month futures remain backwardated, with February futures settling at a $2.50/t premium to March. Current cold weather in Europe — forecast to get colder still — should provide some support for gasoil futures. By Josh Michalowski Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Ice gasoil futures and backwardation at eight-month low
Ice gasoil futures and backwardation at eight-month low
London, 8 January (Argus) — Front-month Ice gasoil futures and the time spread between the front-month and second-month contracts both fell to the lowest in eight months at Wednesday's close, as the European diesel market enters its seasonally lowest period of demand. Ice January gasoil futures fell by $13.25/t on the day to $601/t on Wednesday, the lowest settlement price for the front-month contract since 30 May 2025. The January futures settled at a 50¢/t premium to the second-month February futures, the narrowest since 9 May. When prompt prices are greater than forward prices, it is known as backwardation. The outright value of the front-month contract and the backwardated futures structure peaked in mid-November, when supply was tightened by a mixture of low amounts on the water heading to Europe and sanctions-related disruption to supply. European imports have since recovered to higher levels. But the main driver behind the falling outright values and narrowing structure is probably seasonally weak demand. January and February are normally the weakest months for European road fuel consumption. EU diesel deliveries in January and February 2025 were around 5pc below those in December 2024, and almost 10pc lower than any of the other non-winter months in 2024, Eurostat data show. European diesel demand faces further pressure this year from Germany's adoption of the EU's Renewable Energies Directive (RED III), which will adjust the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction quota and abolish double counting of advanced fuels. To reach the adjusted GHG quota, refineries will probably increase the biofuel content blended with diesel, reducing demand for the latter. Argus estimates at least 1mn t of fossil road fuel demand will be substituted by HVO in Germany this year, with most of that diesel. A disconnect between diesel prices and fundamentals has continued into this year, with the market mostly driven by geopolitical news and sentiment, according to a European trader. That could explain why the January futures' premium against the February contract has narrowed even with EU sanctions coming into force on 21 January that will will remove from the European market Indian and Turkish diesel refined from Russian crude, and with independent stocks of diesel and other gasoil at the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) hub at a four-and-a-half-month low in the week to 31 December, according to consultancy Insights Global. By Josh Michalowski Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Carbon capture can raise GHG savings potential: GCMD
Carbon capture can raise GHG savings potential: GCMD
Singapore, 8 January (Argus) — On-board carbon capture and storage (OCCS), coupled with CO2 utilisation in the form of downstream product displacement, can outperform permanent storage in life cycle assessment (LCA), a study by the Global Centre for Maritime Decarbonisation (GCMD) explained. OCCS can be an effective mid-term option for shipping to decarbonise and to reduce "tank-to-wake" emissions, with most ships still expected to be operating on conventional fuels. The study, Project Captured, used data from the world's first ship-to-ship (STS) offloading of liquefied CO2 captured on board a ship with an OCCS system. The liquefied CO2 would eventually be transported overland to be used downstream as industry feedstock. Without a waste heat recovery system (WHRS), this pilot achieved 7.9pc greenhouse gas (GHG) savings with a 10.7pc onboard capture rate, resulting in 582 kg of CO2 equivalent (kgCO2e) per tonne of CO2 captured and offloaded. GHG savings was equal to 0.84t of CO2 emission avoided per tonne of CO2 captured and offloaded. Another 375 kgCO2e/t of CO2 captured and offloaded was introduced from offloading and transport, particularly from truck transport of more than 2,200km, which contributed to half of the captured emissions at 194 kgCO2e/t. Hose purging before and after offloading resulted in the second-highest CO2 emissions of 99 kgCO2e/t, which was 26pc of transport emissions. In the real-life pilot, industry utilisation of captured CO2 was key in realising emissions savings. Emissions captured through the production of post-carbonated slag (PCS) and precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) stood at 951 kgCO2e/t. Optimised value chains Total value-chain GHG savings can rise to 17.8pc, when inefficiencies are cut by installing a WHRS, using a pipeline to transport CO2, and aligning offloaded CO2 volume and tank capacity, as demonstrated in the study's hypothetical scenarios with optimised value chains. Savings are equivalent to about 2t of CO2 reduced per tonne or CO2 captured and offloaded from the ship. The fuel penalty also fell from 5pc to 1.5pc, compared with a baseline scenario of the ship operating without OCCS. Another key finding reflected that the usage of CO2 in a carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) value chain can avoid more GHG emissions, compared to permanent storage in the carbon capture and storage (CCS) pathway. If shipowners can optimise the CCU pathway, higher GHG savings of 68-71pc are possible, depending on whether the PCS output is used for steel sintering or concrete production. The GHG savings from the utilisation of CO2 is significantly higher than a 21pc emissions savings measured in the CCS pathway, where captured CO2 was permanently stored. "Project Captured shows that onboard carbon capture, when thoughtfully integrated with utilisation pathways, can deliver real emissions reductions today while we continue to scale up low- and zero-carbon fuels," said GCMD's chief executive officer, Lynn Loo. "If our frameworks continue to ignore avoided emissions and displaced carbon, we risk disincentivising investments in solutions that can meaningfully bend the emissions curve," said Loo, underscoring the importance of how GHG reductions are measured and accounted for. Current GHG accounting methods by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) give shipowners limited incentive to invest in OCCS, since formal frameworks do not account for avoided GHG emissions in the case where highly emissive products are displaced by captured CO2 equivalents. The study suggests that future LCA guidelines by the IMO should address cross-sector allocation of both emissions and avoided emissions, to prevent double counting and encourage more shipowners to invest in OCCS. More countries are making progress in the final utilisation and storage of CO2. Indonesia intends to support carbon utilisation initiatives , and Denmark has awarded the first licence of permanent CO2 storage in the country. Japanese shipping firms like Kline have also received more liquefied CO2 carriers to meet the growing demand for carbon capture projects. By Cassia Teo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US E15 talks continue as funding crunch looms
US E15 talks continue as funding crunch looms
New York, 7 January (Argus) — Energy groups are still negotiating legislation to expand access to a higher-ethanol gasoline blend and rein in refiners' ability to skirt biofuel mandates, as a looming funding impasse adds urgency to the talks. Negotiations that include the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the ethanol advocates Growth Energy and the Renewable Fuels Association continue, three people familiar with the talks told Argus . The hope is to reach some compromise on a bill that could revamp retail fuel markets in the US and convince lawmakers to add it to a larger package, potentially legislation to fund the government after 30 January. The powerful oil group withdrew support for a slimmer bill last year that would have allowed year-round sales of gasoline with 15pc ethanol (E15) and is pushing instead for a broader package that would make it harder for small refineries to win hardship exemptions from annual biofuel mandates. President Donald Trump's administration granted dozens of those hardship requests last year and floated making companies without exemptions blend more biofuels to compensate , unnerving oil majors and reshuffling the E15 debate. Smog rules separately limit summertime sales of E15 in most of the country without emergency waivers, which advocates say has deterred retailers from investing in new infrastructure. Most US gasoline is sold as a 10pc ethanol blend. The API and the ethanol groups agree on the general framework of a bill that would authorize E15 year-round and limit future exemptions from biofuel mandates, including by preventing larger refiners that own small units like Delek and Par Pacific from requesting relief. The groups plan to support adding new exemption provisions to existing E15 bill text rather than push lawmakers to scrap that draft, two people familiar with the talks said. But there are still thorny issues to resolve — such as the effective date for any changes — and some provisions risk riling energy and farm interests otherwise on board with reining in exemptions. Adding to, rather than replacing, the current E15 bill would, for instance, keep a provision effectively compensating some small refineries for past biofuel mandates. That draft would return compliance credits to certain refiners and — unlike current rules where credits expire — allow their use in future years. Even small facilities can spend tens of millions of dollars each year buying enough credits to comply with the mandates, and returned credits usable indefinitely would be even more valuable. Eligibility is limited to small refineries that retired credits to meet biofuel mandates in 2016, 2017 or 2018 and had hardship petitions outstanding to start December 2022, as well as companies that complied with 2018 quotas and had petitions denied before July 2022. EPA exemption data those years is limited, making it unclear which companies would benefit. Calling on Congress The groups working on revised bill text have another challenge: convincing Congress to act. Growth Energy, the Renewable Fuels Association and dozens of other farm and biofuel groups urged Congress to pass some E15 fix "as soon as possible" in a joint letter to House and Senate leaders on Wednesday, a nod to the looming deadline to fund the government before a potential shutdown later this month. E15 legislation is unlikely to pass on its own, so lobbyists are closely tracking the legislative calendar for opportunities to add it to larger packages. The letter does not mention the API talks, which are proceeding separately. Small refiners worried about losing access to relief — at the same time as the Trump administration readies what could be record-high biofuel quotas for the next two years — will also press sympathetic lawmakers. Notably, a statement accompanying a bipartisan appropriations bill draft released this week recommends that EPA rethink "policies and procedures" for exemptions in response to a 2022 Government Accountability Office analysis that criticized the agency's approach. That watchdog report questioned EPA's argument that small refineries can easily pass on the costs of meeting biofuel mandates in fuel sales. Energy lobbyists noted that the statement's recommendations are nonbinding and that similar language around exemptions has appeared in past statements accompanying appropriations bills. But it signals that some members of Congress might oppose any changes to fuel policy that could raise costs for refineries in their districts and states. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.



