Steam cracker capacity addition: relief in sight
Global steam cracker operating rates have been trending downward from 89pc in 2018 to 79pc in 2023, driven by the combination of high-capacity increase and slower economic growth in recent years.
In Argus's latest Ethylene Analytics, a recovery is forecast to take place in the coming years as the recent wave of new capacity cools off, absorbing demand growth before the second wave of capacity addition outgrows demand from 2027-2029. This recovery is based on a modelled assumption of modest growth in the global economy and a slowdown in capacity expansion. Historically, olefins demand growth has trended in line with GDP growth on a global basis; in recent years this relationship has disconnected. This was a result of the imbalance between the service and manufacturing industries, but we anticipate the trend will revert sooner or later moving forward.
The petrochemical industry is experiencing high levels of upcoming capacity over the next five years. On a global level, ethylene and propylene capacity is expected to increase by 47.4mn t (4pc) and 44.0mn t (5pc), respectively, over the next five years while global capacity growth from 2018 to 2023 averaged at 4.5pc/yr for both ethylene and propylene. Most investment in ethylene production has gone into steam crackers where ethylene is the main product and propylene is produced as a co-product. Propylene will see a high-capacity increase from not only steam crackers but also from propane dehydrogenation (PDH) projects, which will delay the recovery of global propylene operating rates.
The first wave of ethylene capacity addition is cooling off, but a second wave is expected to kick off in 2026. However, propylene is currently undergoing its wave of capacity addition before seeing a slowdown from 2028 onward. On the propylene side of the olefins chain, 50pc of the upcoming capacity will come from PDH, 34pc from steam crackers and the rest will be a combination of sources from refinery, coal, and methanol.
Operating rates in all regions are being negatively impacted by the combination of high-capacity increase and slower global economic growth. Olefins demand has experienced slower growth over the past two years, with negative growth in 2022 as a result of high inflation and lower consumer spending.
Based on current market fundamentals there have been project delays across most regions and also rationalisation from uncompetitive units. With steam crackers running at lower-than-normal operating rates, rationalization of capacities is a significant unknown as what assets are to shut down are dependent on many factors such as company financials, politics, and integration factors. This makes the rationalization of specific units tough to predict.
As western nations are experiencing slower GDP growth, developing nations will be the key regions for olefins growth. We are seeing a slowdown in Chinese and northeast Asian GDP, but south Asian GDP has been holding strong. Polymer demand, which accounts for more than half of olefins consumption will be the main driver of olefins demand (65pc of ethylene gets consumed into PE and 71pc of propylene gets consumed into PP globally). From a supply perspective, 17pc (8mn t) of all upcoming cracker projects have yet to start construction, which will give operating rates a boost if delayed. Given the slowdown in global economic growth in the past two years, high interest rates, and inflation, the overall outlook is fairly bearish. Consumer spending, household disposable income, economic growth, project timelines, and rationalization from uncompetitive production facilities will be the main indicators of how quickly it will take for operating rates to recover.
Current announced projects
In the past five years, most steam cracker capacity increases took place in China and the trend is expected to persist over the next five years based on announced projects, but most regions are investing. Other Asian countries such as India, South Korea, Vietnam, and Indonesia are also investing. A total of 25.6mn t and 32.9mn t of ethylene and propylene capacity is expected to come online in China over the next five years. Below is the summary of upcoming stream cracker projects globally.
Chinese projects that are currently under construction include Wanhua Chemial, Yulongdao Refining & Petrochemical, Sinopec, Jilin Petrochemical and more. Joint venture steam cracker projects in China between domestic producers and multinational corporations have also started construction which includes Sabic-Fujian Petrochemical, Ineos Sinopec Tianjin, Shell CNOOC Petrochemical, BASF Zhanjiang, and ExxonMobil. These projects will increase ethylene capacity by 21.8mn t over the upcoming five years. Asian nations excluding China includes S-oil South Korea, Hindustan Petroleum India, Lotte Chemical Indonesia have also started construction which totals 5.2mn t of ethylene capacity.
Borouge, SATORP and a joint venture between CP Chem and Qatar Energy in the Middle East are also investing in new crackers with a total capacity addition of 5.2mn t. In Europe, Ineos Project One and PKN Orlen have announced projects while Sabic UK invested in a green project. The Sabic project involves restarting and converting its current cracker to run on hydrogen.
Russia has steam cracker projects slated to start up in the five-year span, including Nizhnekamskneftekhim, Irkutsk Oil, Baltic Chemical, and Amur GCC while Uzbekistan has also announced an expansion from Gas Chemical Complex. North America has three projects slated to come on over the next five years that will increase its capacity by 3.6mn t. North American projects include Shintech US, Joint venture CP Chem Qatar Energy, and Dow in Canada.
Argus’s Ethylene Analytics includes a global plant-level capacity dataset detailing expected project timelines.
Author: Dhanish Kalayarasu
Date: 15/05/2024
Spotlight content
Related news
Gdansk refinery ups output after maintenance
Gdansk refinery ups output after maintenance
Warsaw, 8 April (Argus) — Poland's 210,000 b/d Gdansk refinery is increasing production after completing scheduled maintenance earlier this month. Most of the units taken off line for between late February and early April have restarted, as planned, operator Rafineria Gdanska said on 7 April. Maintenance was conducted on crude and vacuum distillation units, a diesel hydrotreater, the MHC mild hydrocracker, a reformer, the jet fuel Merox and hydrogen generation units, and two sulphur recovery units. A second phase of planned maintenance at Gdansk takes the refinery's three base oil units off line from 8 April until mid-May. Rafineria Gdanska is a joint venture of state-controlled Orlen with 70pc and state-controlled Saudi Aramco holding 30pc. Orlen is planning maintenance on a hydrocracker at its 373,000 b/d Plock refinery in Poland from 13 May until 24 June. The Polish company's 63,000 b/d Kralupy refinery in the Czech Republic has been shut down for scheduled maintenance since mid-March and should restart in early May. Orlen's 190,000 b/d Mazeikiai refinery in Lithuania was off line for 30 days of planned maintenance last month. By Tomasz Stepien Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Malaysian biodiesel group urges faster B20 rollout
Malaysian biodiesel group urges faster B20 rollout
Singapore, 7 April (Argus) — The Malaysian Biodiesel Association (MBA) has urged the government to speed up the nationwide rollout of biodiesel-fossil diesel blends of up to 20pc (B20) to strengthen energy security, it said today. The MBA called for immediate implementation of higher blending levels between B10 and B20 in areas where infrastructure can support it. It acknowledged that progress towards higher blends has been limited by infrastructure readiness but sought further government support to enable a nationwide B30 blend. To encourage biodiesel use outside the national blending programme, the MBA also asked the government to exempt a 10pc sales tax on biodiesel. The national biodiesel programme, combined with voluntary biodiesel use, would enhance energy security, cut greenhouse gas emissions, generate foreign exchange savings, reduce exposure to global oil price shocks and improve fiscal resilience while supporting domestic palm oil and rural livelihoods, the MBA said. Malaysia launched the B20 biodiesel programme for the transport sector in February 2020, but implementation has been limited to Langkawi, Kedah, Labuan and Sarawak. B7 remains the applied blend in the industrial sector without a nationwide rollout, the MBA said. Neighbouring countries have also announced or are considering higher biodiesel blending levels because of energy security concerns due to the war in the Middle East. Indonesia last week announced it will implement a B50 blending mandate from 1 July while Thailand adjusted the biodiesel content from B5 to B7 in March and has announced restrictions on crude palm oil exports from 7 April . By Malcolm Goh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Israel hits Iran's Assaluyeh petchem complex
Israel hits Iran's Assaluyeh petchem complex
Dubai, 6 April (Argus) — Several facilities in Iran's key Pars petrochemical complex in Assaluyeh were damaged in US-Israeli strikes Monday, according to Iran's state petrochemicals company NPC. NPC did not name the facilities struck, just saying that the "criminal attacks" were on "a number of ancillary facilities linked to the petrochemical complex of the Pars Special Economic Energy Zone," and that damage assessments are still underway. But state media said two power and desalination plants, Jam and Damavand, which supply electricity and water to the complex, were targeted, causing widespread power disruptions across the complex. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz said today that Tel Aviv had carried out a "powerful strike on the largest petrochemical facility in Iran" in Assaluyeh, that he said was responsible for about half of the country's petrochemical production. He described the attack as a"severe economic blow to the Iranian regime." The complex hosts at least 21 operating petrochemical plants and takes feedstock from the giant offshore South Pars gas field that Iran shares with Qatar. South Pars accounts for 70-75pc of Iran's gas production and supplies a significant share of feedstock to the country's petrochemical and gasoline sectors. At least four gas treatment plants in Assaluyeh, which process sour gas from South Pars, were taken offline on 18 March following a similar Israeli drone attack . The incident prompted Iranian retaliatory strikes on downstream energy facilities in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar, including the LNG facility in Ras Laffan Industrial City . US president Donald Trump later said Israel would not target South Pars again unless Iran attacked Qatar . The attack was just the latest in a string of US-Israeli strikes targeting Iran's petrochemicals industry. Another petrochemical complex in Marvdasht, Fars province, was also targeted on Monday, causing fire which was later contained, while a key petrochemical complex in Mahshahr, in Khuzestan province, was struck on Saturday, shutting down production across the hub. Iranian state media said the Fajr 1, Fajr 2, Karun, Razi and Bandar Imam petrochemical companies were damaged in the strikes. These attacks came as Trump reiterated over the weekend his threat to strike Iran's electric power infrastructure if Tehran does not allow unfettered passage through the strait of Hormuz . Both Trump and Iran rejected the latest proposal for a ceasefire floated by Pakistan. By Rithika Krishna and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Q&A: Neste on circular feedstocks, mass balance
Q&A: Neste on circular feedstocks, mass balance
London, 2 April (Argus) — Finnish refiner Neste recently commissioned a 150,000t/yr upgrading facility for liquefied plastic waste, including plastic-derived pyrolysis oil, in Porvoo, Finland, to supply recycled plastic-based feedstocks to the petrochemicals market. Neste's director of polymers and chemicals Maiju Helin spoke to Argus about expectations for the market, their views on EU mass balance rules, and hopes for bio-based content targets for plastic packaging. What are your current experiences and future expectations for the demand for plastic pyrolysis oil and circular feedstocks in Europe? The market is gradually on a growth trajectory, but developing slower than we expected. We see there will be demand when the regulation kicks in, but now we are between the adoption of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) and recycled content targets coming into force so it's really not affecting the market as heavily as we would have wanted to see. Other aspects such as high energy costs, the competitive pressure towards the European petrochemical industry coming from outside of Europe, delays that we see in chemical recycling plans and geopolitical uncertainties have slowed the development of the market. Nevertheless, we now have the world's largest upgrading capacity and are ready to grow with the market and ramp up as supply/demand develops. The upgrader has an input capacity of 150,000 t/yr, significantly more pyrolysis oil capacity than is available in the European market — how quickly do you anticipate being able to fill this? I can't comment on our current state of operation. But you are absolutely right that today we will not be able to run this unit at full capacity. We hope to as soon as possible, but we need to see how quickly the market develops and how the supply pool develops. And then, we are there to do this together with our suppliers and customers at scale. What is Neste's position on the mass balance accounting rules being adopted in the EU for allocating recycled content from chemical recycling in the Single-Use Plastic Directive (SUPD), and ahead of discussions about the rules to be adopted for the PPWR? Our new facility processes liquefied waste plastic, and then the upgraded pyrolysis oil is co-processed with intermediates coming from crude oil refining [in the Porvoo refinery]. The rules that were laid down for the SUPD make it rather difficult for the refineries to create value from their contribution towards the recycled content targets. We want to ensure that the refineries will enable the scale-up of chemical recycling within Europe. Refineries have a role to play for several reasons. It is about a lower investment overall, because refineries have existing infrastructure that can be used at a lower cost than greenfield. We know from the Draghi report [a 2024 report by Italy's Mario Draghi on Europe's competitiveness and the EU's future] that Europe doesn't have that much investment money on the table. The Porvoo refinery is able to remove impurities and optimise chemical compositions. This allows liquefiers to use more difficult-to-recycle waste streams and eases the raw material competition with mechanical recycling. We hope Europe readjusts the mass balance recycled content calculation rules for the PPWR, so that we can really unleash the potential of this upgrading unit that we have finalised. What could those amendments look like? One idea is to add detail about specific refinery processes, to allow more recycled "credits" to be assigned to petrochemical feedstock if only certain units of the refinery are used to co-process pyrolysis oil, rather than requiring credits to be allocated proportionally across all the refinery output… We are analysing how we could do a credible, credit-based mass balance within the refinery and make it technically and economically feasible at the same time. What you mentioned is potentially one of the ways this could work. But without knowing the exact details, it is difficult to say if it would work for us. We are supporting the fuel use exempt model. We are not advocating for free attribution. But we just need to find ways, for the calculation rules to address the specifics of refineries in a way that they can be eligible within the framework. Neste also owns the European technology licensing rights for pyrolysis company Alterra Energy. How do you perceive the current investment environment for new chemical recycling installations in Europe? We continue to see interest in investing in liquefaction in Europe and we work together with our partners Technip Energies and Alterra to commercialise Alterra's technology. Some investments are being idled or delayed. I guess because players want to wait for clear EU-wide rules on mass balance and end-of-waste criteria. Pyrolysis is one of the most promising technologies to handle the multi-layer packaging waste, mixed plastic waste and other difficult-to-recycle plastic waste streams. Legislative uncertainty is not the only hurdle, but probably the biggest one... also the geopolitical situation and costs in general have an impact. Would Neste invest itself in pyrolysis capacity in Europe? Our role today is in the upgrading part of the value chain. The aim of the licensing is to create supply and accelerate the scaling up of chemical recycling. If the mass balance rules remain unfavourable towards an upgrading process such as the one you have, involving co-processing in a refinery, for PPWR, are there other uses for this upgrader? And what is the future for the asset? Our priority is on upgrading liquefied waste plastic even if we have recognised the restricted raw material availability at the moment. The investment was made solely for liquefied waste plastic and we created a segregated liquefied waste plastic input for the upgrading facility. All in all, it's too early to talk about something like that, because we primarily want to see the liquefied waste plastic succeeding in the polymers and chemicals market. We are not looking at the fuel pool as an alternative market for liquefied waste plastic-based products. Neste is also a major biofuels producer. Would you support bio-based polymers being allowed to count towards existing recycled content targets in PPWR, or would you prefer them to have separate targets? We're in favour of including bio-based plastics within PPWR, and how we would want to see it happen is with separate targets for bio-based material and recycled material. We are a firm believer in the need to move away from the use of fossil raw materials and need to enable all possible raw materials and technologies to be eligible and to thrive. Recycled and renewable raw materials for the petrochemical industry work well together and can make the greatest impact in moving away from the use of fossil. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.