Overview
Argus has been bringing price transparency to the oil industry since 1970, providing valued insight into all refined products and biofuels markets globally.
Our range of industry-leading price benchmarks, all informed by the most robust methodologies, provide a true reflection of how the markets operate and are relied upon across the value chain to facilitate global trade.
Our experts are embedded in local markets across the world and are in constant contact with market participants for the latest spot market intelligence. Their insights underpin our price assessments and market analysis, enabling our clients to make the most effective decisions for their business.
Oil products market coverage
Argus is the leading independent provider of market intelligence to the global energy and commodity markets. Our price assessments and market intelligence are available for every kind of refined oil product. Explore the coverage most relevant for your industry.
Latest oil products news
Browse the latest market moving news on the global oil products industry.
Kansas will not join states ensuring E15 access
Kansas will not join states ensuring E15 access
New York, 1 April (Argus) — Kansas will not move to join a group of farm states transitioning next year to a boutique summer gasoline blend, which would have ensured continued access to a higher-ethanol blend in the state. Seven Midwestern states have approval to eventually move a lower-volatility summertime fuel that would allow retailers to keep selling both typical 10pc ethanol gasoline (E10) and blends with up to 15pc ethanol (E15). Kansas governor Laura Kelly (D-Kansas), frustrated by an impasse about federal biofuel policy, said earlier this year that she would give "strong consideration" to submitting a request by 1 April to join those states starting in 2027. But much has since changed in fuel markets. The US-Israel war with Iran has sent pump prices sharply higher, and President Donald Trump's administration has tried to contain the fallout by issuing emergency waivers that streamline summertime fuel rules across the country. Those waivers allow year-round sales of E15 in areas where it would have otherwise been limited while also effectively delaying the Midwestern states' fuel change — first planned for 2025 and then for 2026 — to next year. "With the granting of the temporary E15 waiver, E15 will continue to be sold through 2026", Kelly's office said. "While the governor strongly considered the permanent opt-out, she recognizes that it would not take effect until 2027 and felt that it is a decision best left to the next administration." A new governor will take office next year in Kansas. The Clean Air Act exempts E10 from summertime smog rules that would otherwise prevent its sale but does not extend the same treatment to E15 despite similar air quality impacts. The Midwestern bloc as a workaround had won approval to opt out of the special treatment for E10, effectively putting E10 and E15 on equal footing by requiring less-volatile but costlier blendstocks for both. The farm-state governors saw the workaround as a way to ensure continued E15 access no matter how federal policy changes. But the transition also threatened higher pump prices during peak summer driving season, a political risk even before the war. Kansas deciding not to join the other opt-out states comes despite a lack of progress in Congress on permanently exempting E15 from summertime smog rules, leaving decisions around access each summer to regulators. A task force of US lawmakers has struggled for months to reach agreement on biofuel legislation that would allow E15 sales year-round, in part because some oil refiners have objected to earlier proposals that would restrict their ability to win exemptions from biofuel blend mandates. E15 is typically cheaper than E10, although the blend is not sold at the vast majority of US fuel stations. Advocates blame the lack of availability on regulatory uncertainty deterring retailers from investing in higher ethanol blends. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Iran, US presidents trade peace requirements: Update 2
Iran, US presidents trade peace requirements: Update 2
adds Iranian denial of ceasefire request in paragraph 4 London, 1 April (Argus) — The presidents of Iran and the US have each laid out simple conditions required in order for the war to de-escalate, but neither indicated they would take the first step. Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian said late on 31 March that Tehran has the "necessary will" to bring the conflict with the US and Israel to an end, but only once it has ironclad guarantees that they will not attack Iran in the future. On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump said "Iran's new regime president" — presumably Pezeshkian, but this was not specified — has asked Washington for a ceasefire, but said this request would only be considered when Iran reopens shipping through the strait of Hormuz. Until then the US would continue its military campaign, Trump said. Iran's foreign ministry spokesman has since described Trump's claim of a ceasefire request as "false and baseless", according to Iranian state news agency Press TV. This would be consistent with Tehran's recent stance. Iranian officials, including foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, have repeatedly said Iran is not looking for a ceasefire, but wants a total end to hostilities. They have said a ceasefire will allow for the US and Israel to once again regroup and prepare for future attacks. "We do not believe in a ceasefire," Araqchi said. "We believe in ending the war." The US has been claiming negotiations with unidentified Iranian officials since last week, repeatedly remarking on "very good" progress. Iranian officials have consistently denied that any negotiations are underway. Trump is scheduled to address the US to "provide an important update on Iran" at 21:00 ET on Wednesday (02:00 GMT on Thursday), the White House said. He said on 31 March that US forces could leave the region within two to three weeks. Hormuz disruption The war in the Middle East is in a fifth week, with the US and Israel continuing their heavy aerial campaign against numerous targets across Iran. Tehran has been responding to the attacks by launching missiles and drones at Israel and US-linked assets across the Mideast Gulf, including critical energy infrastructure in Gulf Co-operation Council states. Iranian retaliatory attacks on commercial vessels in and around the strait of Hormuz have heavily restricted traffic through the key waterway, severely curtailing exports of crude oil, oil products, LNG, fertilizers and other commodities from the region. Pezeshkian reiterated that the strait is only closed to vessels with links to "Iran's aggressors and their supporters", and several Asian countries, including Malaysia and Thailand, have said in recent days that Tehran has given assurances of safe passage. Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar said at the weekend that Iran had approved 20 Pakistani-flagged vessels to traverse the strait. Abu Dhabi state-owned Adnoc's chief executive, Sultan al-Jaber, today described the strait's closure as "global extortion", and said "the world must act together to protect the free flow of energy and safeguard economic stability." With the US seemingly preferring other countries to take responsibility for securing the strait, the UK today said it will host this week a meeting of 35 nations' foreign ministers to assess ways of opening the waterway and to make it "accessible and safe after the fighting has stopped". London did not outline which countries are involved, but if they are the same 35 as co-signed a UK letter in mid-March calling for the strait to reopen this would be a new attempt to get an international coalition together. In the early days of the war France said it would create a coalition to secure vessel traffic through Hormuz, but Paris later backtracked on that , in line with the broader EU stance . By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Iran, US presidents trade peace requirements: Update
Iran, US presidents trade peace requirements: Update
Recasts, with added comments from US president, Adnoc CEO, UK PM London, 1 April (Argus) — The presidents of Iran and the US have each laid out simple conditions required in order for the war to de-escalate, but neither indicated they would take the first step. Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian said late on 31 March that Tehran has the "necessary will" to bring the conflict with the US and Israel to an end, but only once it has ironclad guarantees that they will not attack Iran in the future. On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump said "Iran's new regime president" — presumably Pezeshkian, but this was not specified — has asked Washington for a ceasefire, but said this request would only be considered when Iran reopens shipping through the strait of Hormuz. Until then the US would continue its military campaign, Trump said. Iran has yet to offer any formal response to Trump's latest comments. If true, they would represent a departure from Tehran's recent stance. Iranian officials, including foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, have repeatedly said Iran is not looking for a ceasefire, but wants a total end to hostilities. They have said a ceasefire will allow for the US and Israel to once again regroup and prepare for future attacks. "We do not believe in a ceasefire," Araqchi said. "We believe in ending the war." The US has been claiming negotiations with unidentified Iranian officials since last week, repeatedly remarking on "very good" progress. Iranian officials have consistently denied that any negotiations are underway. Trump is scheduled to address the US to "provide an important update on Iran" at 21:00 ET on Wednesday (02:00 GMT on Thursday), the White House said. He said on 31 March that US forces could leave the region within two to three weeks. Hormuz disruption The war in the Middle East is in a fifth week, with the US and Israel continuing their heavy aerial campaign against numerous targets across Iran. Tehran has been responding to the attacks by launching missiles and drones at Israel and US-linked assets across the Mideast Gulf, including critical energy infrastructure in Gulf Co-operation Council states. Iranian retaliatory attacks on commercial vessels in and around the strait of Hormuz have heavily restricted traffic through the key waterway, severely curtailing exports of crude oil, oil products, LNG, fertilizers and other commodities from the region. Pezeshkian reiterated that the strait is only closed to vessels with links to "Iran's aggressors and their supporters", and several Asian countries, including Malaysia and Thailand, have said in recent days that Tehran has given assurances of safe passage. Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar said at the weekend that Iran had approved 20 Pakistani-flagged vessels to traverse the strait. Abu Dhabi state-owned Adnoc's chief executive, Sultan al-Jaber, today described the strait's closure as "global extortion", and said "the world must act together to protect the free flow of energy and safeguard economic stability." With the US seemingly preferring other countries to take responsibility for securing the strait, the UK today said it will host this week a meeting of 35 nations' foreign ministers to assess ways of opening the waterway and to make it "accessible and safe after the fighting has stopped". London did not outline which countries are involved, but if they are the same 35 as co-signed a UK letter in mid-March calling for the strait to reopen this would be a new attempt to get an international coalition together. In the early days of the war France said it would create a coalition to secure vessel traffic through Hormuz, but Paris later backtracked on that , in line with the broader EU stance . By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Iran repeats will to end conflict, but needs guarantees
Iran repeats will to end conflict, but needs guarantees
London, 1 April (Argus) — Iran's president Masoud Pezeshkian said Tehran has the "necessary will" to bring the current conflict with the US and Israel to an end, but only once it gets ironclad guarantees that they will not attack Iran again in the future. "The solution to normalising the situation is to stop their aggressive attacks," Pezeshkian said late on 31 March. "We have not sought tension or war at any point, and we have the necessary will to end this war, provided the essential conditions are met, especially guarantees this aggression will not be repeated." Pezeshkian's comments were made in a telephone call with the president of the European Council, Antonio Costa, to discuss ways to de-escalate a situation that the latter said had become "extremely dangerous". The war in the Middle East is now in its fifth week, with the US and Israel continuing their heavy aerial campaign against numerous targets across Iran. Tehran has been responding to the attacks by launching missiles and drones at Israel and US-linked assets across the Mideast Gulf, including critical energy infrastructure in Gulf Co-operation Council states. Iranian retaliatory attacks on commercial vessels in and around the strait of Hormuz have heavily restricted traffic through the key waterway, severely curtailing exports of crude oil, oil products, LNG, fertilisers and other commodities from the region. "The current situation in the… strait of Hormuz is a direct result of the hostile and aggressive actions of the US and the Zionist regime [Israel] against Iran," Pezeshkian said, reiterating that the strait is only closed to vessels with links to "Iran's aggressors and their supporters". Several Asian countries, including Malaysia and Thailand, have said in recent days that Iran has given assurances of safe passage for their vessels through the strait. Pakistan's foreign minister Ishaq Dar said over the weekend that Iran had also approved 20 Pakistani-flagged vessels to sail through the strait. Pezeshkian's comments came as US president Donald Trump said US forces could leave Iran within two to three weeks, potentially signalling the end of the ongoing war. "All I have to do is leave Iran, and we will be doing that very soon," Trump said late on 31 March, offering a timeline of "maybe two weeks, maybe three". The Trump administration has been claiming negotiations with unidentified Iranian officials since last week, repeatedly boasting of "very good" progress. Iranian officials have consistently denied that any negotiations are underway. But in an apparent change of tack, Trump said ending the war was now not dependent on securing a formal agreement with Tehran. "Iran does not have to make a deal, no," Trump said. "They don't have to make a deal with me." By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Spotlight content
Browse the latest thought leadership produced by our global team of experts.
Explore our oil products services
Whether you’re looking for independent spot price assessments or long-term market analysis, we have the solutions you need for the refined oil and biofuels markets. Explore the range of our services.
Key price assessments
Argus prices are recognised by the market as trusted and reliable indicators of the real market value. Explore some of our most widely used and relevant price assessments.










